The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments today on the lawsuit arguing that the Little Rock School Board’s buyout of former Supt. Roy Brooks’ contract was an illegal expenditure of tax money.

My witness says the justices’ questions sounded favorably disposed to the school district’s arguments that 1) it was a legal resolution of a contract dispute within the discretion of the board and 2) the issue was moot because Brooks’ has been paid (as well as his lawyers). There’s no money to recover without suing Brooks.

Advertisement

The lawyers challenging the buyout argue that the issue should be resolved regardless of money recovery because it could apply to other buyouts in the future. Justice Tom  Glaze did wonder whether the expenditure was necessary for maintenance and operation of the school district, which is the constitutional standard for spending school money. But if a district can’t fire a contract employee — and pay according to the terms of the contract when that happens — it will be hard to hire superintendents. Thus, a contract buyout seems necessary for operation as a personnel cost.

A quick decision, in the next week or two, is expected.

Advertisement

Be a part of something bigger

As a reader of the Arkansas Times, you know we’re dedicated to bringing you tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, we've been fighting the good fight in Little Rock and beyond – with your support, we can do even more. By becoming a subscriber or donating as little as $1 to our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage and continue to bring important stories to light. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, it's clear that our readers value our great journalism. Join us in the fight for truth.

Previous article LRFF Can’t Miss: ‘War Eagle, Arkansas’ Next article The Arkansas nightmare