
Interesting. Nothing, after a number of catty runup articles, in the New York Times today on Chelsea Clinton's wedding to Marc Mezvinsky this evening at an estate within commuting distance of New York City.
The Washington Post on the other hand blows it out. Speculation on the guest list. A roundup of headlines. A promise of "continuing coverage" on the gossip blog. Twitter chatter galore of course (trending snarky).
My own evening plans include dinner about halfway between Gravel Ridge and Otto — heirloom tomatoes from farmer Al Leveritt will be the headliner, along with pork smoked by pit virtuoso David Koon.
UPDATE: As guests begin to surface, names emerged. There was a rehearsal dinner for the wedding party last night, but also a cocktail party at the hotel where Bill and Hillary Clinton are staying for all wedding guests who are scattered in lodgings ranging from quaint B&Bs to a Hampton Inn in Poughkeepsie. Marie Clinton Bruno of Little Rock talked to the NY Times, remembering Chelsea's role as a bridesmaid in her wedding to Gio. Ted Danson and Mary Steenburgen turned up, too. Bill Clinton lunched with brother Roger. I'd love to know how the NY Times reporter concluded that the throng of young people in attendance (imagine, Chelsea and Marc asked THEIR friends to the wedding) were a mix of Arkansas and the hedge fund world. Perhaps some were barefoot. Hint to NY Times: Some people may be natives of Arkansas AND work at hedge funds. Ask around.
The vast majority of guests looked to be in their late 20s or 30s, perhaps college and work friends of the bride and groom. Perhaps they will be celebrities some day, but for now they can rest comfortably in their anonymity. They seemed to be a mixture of Arkansas and the hedge-fund world. One blonde in a ballooning yellow dress walked across the street to the gawkfest and took pictures of the locals, then had her picture taken with them, then posed with a bemused and very patient state trooper.“We don’t know who we’re looking at,” one bystander complained. “My God, they all look like they’re in their 20s. They’re kids! Seriously, I want to see Oprah.”
PS — Lots of web comments on the caftan Hillary Clinton wore Friday night. Says here, by the way, that the $3 million tabloid wedding figure is way off.
Showing 1-50 of 61
Our own American Royalty. Daughter of the best American President/First Lady in the past 50 years.
I'm glad they overlooked sending me an invitation for I couldn't afforded suitable attire.
Yummy, Max! Alan's tomatoes are impressive! I had some last week at a local watering hole that didn't charge us or call the police for the birthday cake we brought in! Okay did anyone read the editorial in today's daily about Browning's? The author acknowledged the blogosphere and its comments about said establishment. Could it be that Paul Greenberg is a troll on here?! Perhaps Harvey?
I'm curious about something. From the left wing perspective how do you reconcile spending $3 million on a wedding and grieving for the poor? Shouldn't you defer that expense and give it to the poor and have a cheaper wedding? Wouldn't that be the liberal thing to do?
What do you mean they can afford both? That is $3million dollars that will NOT go to the poor. How can you rationalize that? If a conservative does it you are indignant but if a liberal does it you say it is ok. Can't you see the hypocricy? The clintons would not give their own money to the poor. They would want the taxpayers to do it. Liberals are always generous with other people's money. You all know that.
Yeah Harvey, they should've just gone down to the JP and hopped in the car for a honeymoon at Hot Springs; and sent that $3 M to ACORN or the ACLU or NAACP. That would be far preferable to spending it on a losing proposition in Afghanistan, Iraq or Harvey's wet dream - Iran.
Mr Ames
As a Dem I see the point Harvey is trying to make.....just because you have it...does not mean you should flaunt it...which seems to be your interpretation...the kids know better but their folks don't....the grandchildren will all be having their weddings out in the back forty eating Alan's tomatoes.
I expected you to justify their actions only because of who they are. If it had been a conservative you would have vilified their actions. What hypocrites! They are as royal as my big toe! It must be nice to parade around as a friend of the poor as long as those poor don't inconvenience your own life.
Let's say I've raised and given $100 to fight AIDS and other causes. I'm fine with spending my own $3 on a special day for my family.
John 12:3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.
4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which should betray him,
5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?
6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.
8 For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
1. Who knows the precise amount the Clinton's are spending on Chelsea's wedding?
2. Who knows the precise amount of their personal funds the Clinton's have donated to charitable causes--"the poor"?
3. Precisely how much have the critical bloggers on this site contributed to the welfare of "the poor"?
4. Is your concern for the poor, or for an issue to use for criticism of someone else?
5. When conservatives, i.e. the mega-millionaires, spend countless thousands or millions on weddings, birthday parties, Christmas parties, vacations, multiple homes, airplanes, frequent travel, never a single word of criticism is voiced by a liberal. It's their money, they're free to do with it as they please.
6. Conservatives consistently oppose efforts and programs to assist the poor; just check Republicans' voting records on health care, extension of unemployment benefits, Social Security, etc., etc., etc. Every effort to assist the poor is met with rigid resistance by Republicans.
7. Republicans don't seem to mind using tax-payers money to bail out big banks and insurance companies.
8. Republicans don't seem to mind tax reductions for those with ultra-high incomes. They wouldn't want any of THEIR tax money to be channeled to assisting the poor.
9. How is it that conservatives suddenly become concerned with the plight of the poor the very moment a Democrat spends money on a wedding like a Republican? Where was all that conservative concern for the poor last week?!
Just sayin'.
You compare Chelsea Clinton to Jesus Christ? Incredible how far off the leftist mind is! You know nothing of the scriptures or the message that they bring. Please don't lower yourself to that level in order to win an argument. You will only lose both.
The clintons are a pathetic example of how far the American culture has sunk if they represent 'royalty'. JFK and Jacqueline were probably aptly labeled American 'royalty' if that term means anything but the redneck clintons are hardly in the same category. Bill has redneck roots and hillary came from middle class Chicago. Hardly the origins for anything 'royal'.
Harvey, a little "over jealous" aren't we today? Be nice and maybe a neighbor will send over a cookie. That much hatred for anyone can cause an early heart attack.
PLEASE!!! It's her day, they have the money..she is their only adored child...give it a break.
We have much more serious "fish to fry"...
No surprise that Harvey is pissing on a wonderful day for the Clinton family. He'd rather see the 3 of them hung upside down and shot like Musolini & the missus. Yawn.
I hate weddings, even my own. Good luck to Chelsea and hubby, but I have zero interests in the details of their day. I know a lot of rich people. I don't really know if any of them give a penny to charity. It's NONE of my business. But Harv would imply that all rich folks should give the majority of their money to the poor. Where'd he get such an idea? I'm a proud flaming liberal and I've never had such a thought.
While I'm happy when I hear that someone rich has given money to the needy around us, what I think about someone else's money shouldn't be spoken or blogged about...it is NONE of my business. How can you scream about keeping the government out of YOUR business while you're minding the Clinton's money?
And Harv claims superior knowledge in the interpretation of Biblical scriptures. Is there anything you're not an expert at, Harv? If you SEE ALL, why not warn our troops of the next bullet coming or the next roadside bomb? We've only lost more troops in Afghanistan this month than ever before since the stupid war started. Quit bitching about the Clinton's money and put your ALL SEEING ONE BIG EYE to protecting our troops who are dying for the Fortune 500.
I think Chelsea may be better than Jesus Christ, a man who didn't uphold the sacred American tradition of marriage. Jesus spent his time hanging around with a bunch of other guys who didn't have day jobs. Exactly what kind of wedding gifts did Jesus hand out? Did his father raise millions to fight AIDS? No...in fact, his father invented AIDS and let it spread around the world while his boy loafed in the desert.
And did you know that most of Ronald Reagan's children wouldn't speak to him? That he was a lousy father never having any time to spend with his kids? Who else can I bitch about? Newt and his cancerous ex-wife. Asa ignoring the moaning coming from the next bedroom at the Watergate? Palin beating the stork. McCain's fake heroism......the maverick of the made-up?
Have a great day, Chelsea, we're proud of you.
SkyPilot said--"Who knows the precise amount the Clinton's are spending on Chelsea's wedding?"
And who cares? It is not our business. If they have the money and want to spend $10,000 or $3M to celebrate their daughter's wedding, they should be able to do so without all the criticism and speculation.
I notice Harvey didn't question the cost of Sarah Huckabee's wedding in the Virgin Islands recently or Jenna Bush's wedding a few years ago. It's only the daughter of a Democrat that gets his attention.
Troll food:
Judas Iscariot criticized Mary and asserted the money should have been used to aid the poor.
Harvey criticized Bill Clinton and asserted the money shuold have been given to the poor.
Where is the comparison of Chelsea with Jesus Christ?
The comparison is with Harvey to Judas Iscariot!
You don't need many seminary degrees to get this right.
Incidentally, how many seminary degrees do you have, Harvey?
And what makes you think you have any insight into how much scripture I know?
Trolls love unsupported assertions, as well as hasty generalizations--almost as much as criticism of anyone or anything with which they do not argree!
All this animosity over one young woman's wedding?! Tch. Tch. Tch.
Good Luck to Chelsea and her new husband. People who always have something to say are just jealous!! Don't let these nay sayers ruin the most important day of your life. I wish only the best for the two of you!!!!
It is YOUR left wing hypocricy that is being criticized not her wedding. You excuse behavior among those of your same ilk and your criticize that same behavior is those you disagree with. That is what I am pointing out.
Despite the earlier rumors, Roger Clinton did get an invitation -
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/slides…
What a perfect blog thread for a troll to mess up! Now what shall we feed it next?? More class envy? Hypocrisy he has for breakfast.
.
What's missing from Chelsea in that gorgeous wedding rehearsal dress is a bun in the oven, a methed-up future mother-in-law. Wait, they're getting married, not running for V-P.
Any information I have ever read on the topic of charity suggests poor and middle income folks make charitable contributions ***as a percentage of income far*** above the wealthy.
And we certainly know that's true when it comes to taxation.
I hope Bill or Hillary ordered some gardenias... a hot summer wedding needs gardenias.
Do you characterize everyone who is critical as 'jealous'? Funny but clinton always did that for critics of his presidency. I have NEVER heard a president use that term when being critical of those who disagreed with his administration. He was the first. Interesting!
I wish her the best as I do to each couple who enter into holy matrimony. I hope they are blessed and honor their vows 'until death do us part'!
A crumb to a troll:
"You excuse behavior among those of your same ilk and your criticize that same behavior is those you disagree with."
I've read that sentence four times and it still doesn't make any sense.
However, I did see the word "criticize," so please cite ONE INSTANCE where anyone on the AT blog EVER criticized ANYONE for spending money on a wedding, a birthday gift, a vacation.
War? Yes. Bailing out banks and insurance companies? Yes. Enriching the rich while neglecting the "little people"? Yes. Criticizing the wealthy for campaigning for preferential tax breaks? Yes.
Either cite the evidence or STFU.
And why are you so steamed over one family's wedding? Just exactly what is it you're angry about, Harvey?
Who took what from you that you should be so angry over Chelsea's wedding?
I for one hope Chelsea has a great day and a beautiful wedding. She spent a lot of time in our neighborhood growing up and she is a great kid.
There is a crude saying that comes unavoidably to my mind on reading this thread about the marriage of a couple of nice young people:
Turd in the punch bowl.
Best wishes to Chelsea.
Congratulations and best wishes to her loving and proud parents.
It's great to see a family stick together through some tough times and be able to enjoy some good times.
And best wishes to all their friends who gather to wish the young couple well!
And may we all rejoice with those who rejoice!!!
I have said it several times but I will say it again just to get through. I object to people who wrap their robes of left wing self righteousness around them and criticize the government because it doesn't give enough money to the poor and yet have no qualms about spending excesses on themselves. Liberals have no problem spending the tax payers money but they are usually pretty selfish when it comes to spending their own money on the poor.
Several years ago I read an analysis of who gives to charitable organizations. The middle class gave a disproportionate large share of their income to charities. The rich were the lowest givers proportionate to their income. That struck me as curious considering who gets all of the attention.
>>The rich were the lowest givers proportionate to their income.<<
You mean Bush's "haves and have mores?"
I wish the couple a lovely weddin and a prosperous life. May both of them have more of the good things. Neither one chose their parents. Likewise Chelsea never chose her genetics of which strangelove enjoys ridiculing. When a Republic mentions any woman's appearance all I can think of is Barbara Bush.
-----------------------------------
"This is an impressive crowd, the haves and have mores. Some people call you the elite, I call you my base."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn4daYJzyls
Congratulations to Chelsea! And to her parents on raising a young lady who, by all accounts, is smart and accomplished. Happiness to all!
Bushes, Clintons, Rockefellers, Gateses, Maxes, Harveys and Taps -- once you pay your fair share of taxes, Good Luck and Godspeed with whatever you choose to do with the rest! Enjoy the fruit of your labors, or the luck of your birthright, as the case may be!
"I want to see Oprah."
Yep, got her priorities in order, just like someone we know around here who fell in the punch bowl.
Me? I'd like a quick gander at the happy couple and the wedding party, mostly to see the clothes. See, I gots my priorities, too, along with mud between my toes.
And lastly, best wishes to Chelsea and Mark. (I wonder if at any point they gave any thought to eloping.)
So they spent money - on caterers? Working people. Flower shops? Same. Dressmakers? You get my point. It's the rich pumping money into the economy. Only a socialist would find fault with that, harvey.
Well, the defense department is pumping a lot of money into the economies of Iraq and Afghanistan. A lot of poor folks have jobs and money because of that. Is that ok with you?
Harvey, war is the Republican stimulus plan. Just look at where a lot of the plants are located. Those companies can certainly afford to give to their favorite representative and senator from all of those no-bid contracts that guarantee excessive profits. And if you guessimated low, hell just raise the price like on the Osprey and the new fighter. Uncle has a lot of money. And the more they get, the more they give. No wonder we can't get useless programs killed off, even with the Defense Department says they aren't needed. A senator from SC, AL, or GA knows more about future war needs than any admiral or 4-star general.
Yea, and all of that was going on when Bubba was President!
Ah, I love weddings. They're like spring...hopeful despite anything. Congratulations to the couple and the families!! Given the Clintons' history with their daughter, I imagine the wedding was all about her/her friends, not Oprah.
Hunkastrangeharvey never met a happy liberal he couldn't piss all over. Good thing we're like the Clintons: Immune to that crap.
TOP TEN THINGS THAT MEN UNDERSTAND ABOUT WOMEN
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
*__*
A businessman boarded a plane to find, sitting next to him, an elegant woman wearing the largest, most stunning diamond
ring he had ever seen. He asked her about it.
"This is the Harvey diamond," she said. "It is beautiful, but there is a terrible curse that goes with it."
"What's the curse?" the man asked.
"Mr. Harvey."
"And did you know that most of Ronald Reagan's children wouldn't speak to him? That he was a lousy father never having any time to spend with his kids? Who else can I bitch about? Newt and his cancerous ex-wife. Asa ignoring the moaning coming from the next bedroom at the Watergate? Palin beating the stork. McCain's fake heroism......the maverick of the made-up?"
That's good, DBI. Once again, you have had the definitive word.
Bubba is not immune. He has a notorious temper and so does hillary. So please spare me the phony image of wonderfulness.
So after all that the Clinton's did not spend anywhere near a few million.
What a surprise...but it was a nice talking point for the haters out there and to get Harvey in a snit.
eLwood, where is the picture of Chelsea in her rehearsal dress please? I thought Hillary looked lovely.
if the wedding guest list had been filled wtih her parents' friends, they would have Lord only knows how many Secret Service men working the wedding. I figured they would have the sense to do it this way.
RIP SGK
John Burris is like 27 years old. Enough said.
About death and dying, everyone must reach their own decision. "The American Way of Death"…
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings