DOG columnist Linda Caillouet took a cheap shot at Mara Leveritt and the Times this morning by suggesting an ethical shortcoming in Mara's work to publicize last weekend's benefit concert for the West Memphis Three. Mara, who is a periodic contributor to this paper, has been a declared advocate for this cause for years. The movement to free the WM3 rests on the foundation of her careful reporting and her book, "Devil's Knot."
On the jump, you'll find a letter Mara wrote to the columnist about it, along with a link to the YouTube video below in which Mara described her evolution as WM3 advocate. As for the Times, we've never made a secret of, or an apology for, drawing conclusions based on our reporting and advocating important causes. We don't now.
PS — Maybe Caillouet is just in a bad mood. I've been hearing some griping about the D-G's coming "upgrade" of the hated newsroom time clock with a fingerprint scanner, as opposed to a scanner that required only an ID card.
MARA LEVERITT'S LETTER
Dear Linda,
I’m sorry you didn’t call me to ask about my presumed conflict of interest. I would have been happy to tell you “the rest of the story,” which is this: I have been writing about the West Memphis case since 1994. Most of what I’ve written, including Devil’s Knot, I’ve written as a reporter, holding to what I believe are high standards of fairness and accuracy. Over the years, I have also written columns and opinion pieces about the case, based on what I’ve learned.
As support for the convicted men grew, public officials here in Arkansas began to receive volumes of mail critical of their trials. In turn, as local media began to ask questions the response of many officials was that Arkansans were confident that the right men were in prison. They added that the complainers were people from out-of-state who didn’t know what really happened. About four years ago, upon hearing that response yet again, I decided to speak out. After all, I am an Arkansan and, having reported on this case in depth, I do know what transpired. At a time when few people in Arkansas understood the gravity of this situation, I felt that working to call attention to the case was the responsible thing to do. I wrote to Max Brantley, my editor at the Arkansas Times, and told him that, while I intended to continue to report on the case, I was also going to speak out, denouncing all that was wrong with the trials and advocating for new—and fair—ones. Max said okay, and that is what I’ve done since.
I have been very up-front about this, both in writing and in public appearances. If you took the time, for instance, you could hear me explain this transition in a talk I gave recently at North Little Rock’s Laman Library, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAdH_aB4HJk. I have a good reputation, which I value. Perhaps because of that, and because I have been so forthright about my dual roles in this matter, no one that I know of—until you—has suggested a “problem” with my ethics.
I did enjoy meeting you at the Capitol Hotel bar Saturday night, but I think you took a cheap—and uninformed—shot this morning. I hope you’ll be able to find a few words in a future column to explain that, like many fine journalists before me, I have taken a public stand opposing an abuse of power.
Sincerely,
Mara
Showing 1-15 of 15
Thanks for alerting us to this situation, Max. I don't read any DoG columns except Gene Lyons, so I would have missed it.
I read Caillouet about 50% of the time. Some days she's got some interesting stuff, some days it's pretty dull. Overall, I'd give her a C+ or B- if I was in the bidness of grading her work. No secret I'd give Wally a D- or F.
But now, Mara Leveritt? Better not nobody go messin' round with that lady in my presence. She's top-notch. Love her work. She gets an A. On all of it; books, columns, whatever. She'd be at my fantasy dinner if ever I had one of those things.
As for Caillouet being in a bad mood, well hey, it happens. Think things have not been terribly smooth for the lady of late; divorce is often a necessity but isn't always easy, or so I hear. Hope I never have to experience one to find out for sure.
Anyway, let's hope the ladies get things worked out. And the sooner the better. Life's too short for ordinary jewelry and the same can be said for fusses.
The DOG, a news paper long known for its bigotry against minorities & bias against all but the most wealthy has the audacity to accuse a real reporter of conflict of interest? No doubt they’ll trot out the victim label while real victims are ignored, abused & tortured.
“Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.” Paulo Freire
OK, Max, the judges grant you a cheap shot point on that one.
Does that mean no more cheap shots from your side of the net? Since when?
Yep, eL, some of us notice the avatars. And your's of Miss Sarah makes her look, well, pretty 'hippy', don't you think?
“The DOG, a news paper long known for its bigotry against minorities . . .”
Oh, come now, Zatharus. That’s totally over the top, The chief editorial writer is a Jew who in 1969 won a Pulitzer Prize at the Pine Bluff Commercial for his editorials during the civil rights struggle. He was also a Pulitzer finalist in 1978 and 1986. While they disgust many of us here, Greenberg's and the publisher's anti-LRSD editorials don't equate to them or anybody else at "The DOG" being bigots.
Caillouet is a gossip columnist; nothing more, nothing less. She can cover the trite things in life as she always does, she should leave the heavy lifting [of real news and analysis] to someone with insight skills higher than the social page fluffs.
Linda is horrible. every other day she has to run a correction of a previous column.
ridiculous. she is a waste of space in an already shrinking paper.
Move her out.
Well, color me dull, but I don't see a problem. Perhaps Linda could expand on the thought? Right after, I suppose, she breathlessly tells us who hoofs it to his next gig.
That Caillouet wrote of anything of substance is news. That she got it wrong on her first try, a pity. Now she won't try it again.
The Democrat-Gazette, the only paper that didn't send anyone to the press conference or to the rally... No, that certainly wasn't news! What a shame that a newspaper is being used as a personal bully pulpit.
Hell, folks, all he did was pose for a picture with them. They are citizens…
Thanks to elwood for important citywire story on the newspapers of NWA. Plainjim has it…
That's what I meant, RYD, about getting your revenge later.
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings