Monday, September 6, 2010

Congressional payola

Posted by Max Brantley on Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:17 AM

Good story in the New York Times about charitable organizations established by some two dozen members of Congress that rake in contributions from corporate sources with issues before Congress. It stinks.

A review by The New York Times of federal tax records and House and Senate disclosure reports found at least two dozen charities that lawmakers or their families helped create or run that routinely accept donations from businesses seeking to influence them. The sponsors — AT&T, Chevron, General Dynamics, Morgan Stanley, Eli Lilly and dozens of others — contribute millions of dollars annually in gifts ranging from token amounts to a check for $5 million.

Since 2009, businesses have sent lobbyists and executives to the plush Boulders resort in Scottsdale, Ariz., for a fund-raiser for the scholarship fund of Representative Steve Buyer, Republican of Indiana; sponsored a skeet shooting competition in Florida to help the favorite food bank of Representative Allen Boyd, Democrat of Florida; and subsidized a spa and speedway outing in Las Vegas to aid the charity of Senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada.

Just last month, they touted their largess with flags bearing their names near the tees at a golf tournament benefiting the foundation of Representative James E. Clyburn, Democrat of South Carolina.

Despite rules imposed in 2007 to curb the influence of special interests in Congress, corporate donations to lawmakers’ charities have continued, thanks to a provision that allows businesses to make unlimited gifts to them. And while business executives say they want to give to a good cause, their pattern of spending — contributions that often are not disclosed, in apparent violation of ethics rules — suggests another reason

.

A little of this goes on in Arkansas. We've written before about the nonprofit headed by Sen. Tracy Steele, which has solicited contributions from corporate interests for the foundation's stated objective of leadership training. Its IRS reports don't reveal the sources of some $150,000 in annual contributions, but most of it goes to the organization's salaries and office costs, including a $65,000 salary for Steele.

Tags: ,

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Just another element of the American Corporate State. Mussolini would have been proud.

report   
Posted by Cato on September 6, 2010 at 8:26 AM

As is often said, you get the best legislation you can buy. And the SCOTUS has made sure they can get a free pass on buying the product (legislators).

report   
Posted by couldn't be better on September 6, 2010 at 8:32 AM

Did the NYT really publish the word "largess"? Tsk, so much for a "newspaper of record".

It's one thing to be careless in a blog or text or e-mail ("It's just a typo; you know what I meant"), but apparently no one "has time" for accuracy anymore. It's sad.

report   
Posted by widj on September 6, 2010 at 8:34 AM

“. . the nonprofit headed by Sen. Tracy Steele, which has solicited contributions from corporate interests . .”

And then there was SILO, brought to us by the not-so-Hon. Nick Wilson who was also busy stealing millions of taxpayer dollars meant for disadvantaged children.

report   
Posted by Durango on September 6, 2010 at 8:59 AM

I'm adding this to my growing list of what should be considered tantamount to Low Down Dirty Treason. It's time for a whole lot of these scurrilous poor excuses for pond scum to learn to fall on their own swords in shame.

We simply must create public campaign financing only and alter lobby tactics as soon as humanly possible. And no bill should ever be voted upon without a minimum ten day waiting period of a final draft posted in full on the internet for public scrutiny.

The criminals are still in charge!

report   
Posted by Eureka Springs on September 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM

I have advocated many times for the federal government to eliminate all charities --- that includes every damn one of them. Make them start over and each one, before being granted charity status, be voted on and approved by the voter (you know us guys that pay the bill and have no exemptions).
I know churches etc., will scream to hell and high water but dollar for dollar their support of the needed is dismal at best mostly vocal.

Good a place as any here's something to remember!

How rich is rich?
A lot of politicians are talking about extending the Bush tax cuts claiming the it would raise taxes in the “middle class”. However the news media is trying to redife middle class to include people making $200,000 a year. Is $200,000 a year middle class? I don’t think so.

The average American family income is $46,326 a year. Someone making $200,000 make more that 4 times average. That seems rich to me. They are also in the top 3% on the income scale. That’s on the rich end. In my view if you are in the top 15% that would be rich. So $100,000 a year in my opinion is a rich person.

So I really resent the news media’s assertion that we should extend the Bush tax cuts because it raises taxes on the middle class because it’s just plain false. The Bush tax cuts were for the rich and the rest of us are having to pay for it because it was and continues to be paid for with borrowed money. And borrowing money for the rich to be paid for by the poor is just plain wrong.
Reference on my numbers:

http://www.mybudget360.com/how-much-does-t…

report   
Posted by ButWhoCares on September 6, 2010 at 9:42 AM

BWC-we shouldn't extend the Bush tax cuts at all. The Republicans designed them to disappear so let them go! Then come back with some common sense adjustments to the Medicare tax (eliminate the upper salary exclusion) as well as changing the lower income tax rates. Get rid of that low level for the hedge player and let them pay as short term gains like regular people have to do. Stop all special treatment for those who already have it all. And don't mention how much the rich pay in taxes, tell me HOW MUCH THEY HAVE LEFT after paying!

report   
Posted by couldn't be better on September 6, 2010 at 10:32 AM

I agree with what ButWhoCares said, at least most of it. I have long felt that donations to religious institutions should not be tax deductible, but know it will be a cold day in hell before we get rid of GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION.

My point is that when a government refrains from taxing assets that would otherwise be taxed because those assets are given to or owned by a "tax-exempt" organization, government is supporting that organization just a surely as if it budgeted an allocation to that organization from tax revenue collected by that government. I certainly am not a taxpayer who is willing to help make up revenue lost through exemption of money sent to Joel Olsteen's or Tracy Steele's organizations, just to name two illustrative examples.

So I agree with BWC's suggestion that we eliminate tax exempt "charities" --"every damn one of them." Then citizens can support whatever causes they like, after rendering to Caesar that which is Caesar's. Corporations, which cannot "believe" anything or have a "charitable" purpose, would still invest in other organizations that serve their purposes, but at least you and I would not be compelled to help them.

report   
Posted by Snapback on September 6, 2010 at 10:41 AM

I read this yesterday in the NY Times and just spit. If Congress figures out another way to pull in the bucks for themselves, soon they'll overdose like John Belushi, found slumped over their desks, choked on cash. How much damn money do these people think they need in one lifetime?

Of course, since the beginning of time, the people who write the rules make sure the rules are slanted in their favor....but it's gotten plumb ridiculous! Name a former Arkansas Congresscritter who isn't rolling in dough today. How on earth did Huckabee get rich making 60 thousand per year? You can't do it unless you rob banks on the side.

Our political system is as crooked as a dog's hind leg and has been for years, but it's been on steroids the last 10 years and now the addicts are really dangerous. I don't go to church, I don't believe in God, yet I couldn't lay down and sleep at night knowing that I was getting a special deal in life that the "small people" aren't getting. I know when I earn my keep, I have a good sense of what is fair.....I just couldn't live with myself knowing I was playing both sides of every deal, saying things and voting in ways that make me rich while pulling the carpet out from under someone else.

I guess I never wanted a big cattle ranch or a 2 and 1/2 million dollar mansion in Virginia. I guess I totally bought MLK's line about judging people by the content of their character, not the color of their MONEY. It's a goddamn shame when your representative to Congress is more dishonest than the guy pestering you on the phone to change your cell phone plan. But that's where we are today.

Jim Keet can't keep track of his own airplane, taxes or know where to vote.....we need that? Tim Griffin should be running from his big black cell mate, not for Congress. Boss Womack should be down in darkest Africa setting up his dictatorship with the help of black travel expert Denny Altes. Boozman should be kept in a squeeze chute and force fed to be nice and fat on slaughter day. The majority of the people representing us today aren't fit to run a used car lot. And we wonder WHAT'S WRONG WITH DC?

Modern religion = MONEY and nothing else. A sideshow carnival that would make P.T. Barnum jealous. And now religion is wedded to politics and we're doomed like ancient Rome. It makes it hard to get up in the morning!

report   
Posted by DeathbyInches on September 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM

Uh, widj --

What's your problem with "largess?"

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lar…

MY problem with all this is that it's hardly news: this was what Obama was supposed to tackle and begin cleaning up, wasn't it?

The corruption is apparently unstoppable, since Eisenhower pointed out the dangers of the military-industrial complex back in the day. Ever since, it has grown and metastasized and will soon kill its host, America.

A team of ethical surgeons might help, but even then we may be beyond hope.

Besides, there aren't any ethical surgeons left in American politics. Some, like Obama, may CLAIM the mantle but their actions prove bought and paid-for.

Until, finally, the endlessly entertained, ever-distracted, gadget-laden, increasingly ill-educated, uninformed, shit-paying-job-hating shop-till-you-drop electorate realizes it's futile to bother voting at all, since the choices are indistinguishable and the United States died long ago when nobody was looking.

Which is why I'm in show business. Say what you will; if it gets a little hinky in one place, my agents at WM/E always book me a better gig.

report   
Posted by Norma Bates on September 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM

Pearls Before Swine was good last week, more or less on this subject.

http://comics.com/pearls_before_swine/2010…

http://comics.com/pearls_before_swine/2010…

report   
Posted by Snapback on September 6, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Snapback, the joke is it's not a joke!

report   
Posted by Sound Policy on September 6, 2010 at 10:50 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Author Archives

  • Copper thieves hit skating rink

    If not for crime news, there'd be no news at all. Police say that sometime between 10 p.m. last night and 7 a.m. this morning, some stole 20 feet of heavy-duty copper wire that powered the ice skating rink under the River Market Pavilion 1.
    • Dec 30, 2011
  • Monday night line

    News summary: Double shooting in Alexander and arrest of child rape suspect lead the list.
    • Jan 30, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

February

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29  

Blogroll

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation