Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Briefs set for West Memphis Three hearing

Posted by Max Brantley on Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:39 PM

devilsknot.jpg
Lawyers for the West Memphis Three appeared before a judge in Jonesboro today to set a briefing schedule for the hearing ordered by the Arkansas Supreme Court on whether the three men deserve new trials in the killings of three West Memphis children in 1993.

Times senior editor Mara Leveritt, who wrote the ground-breaking book, "Devil's Knot," that spurred worldwide interest in the case, was on hand to cover the hearing. She reports a first-time court reference to secret DNA testing by Attorney General Dustin McDaniel's office that seems likely to be a subject of much more discussion in future proceedings.

Her full report follows on the jump. You can also keep up with her ongoing coverage on her blog, maraleveritt.com

By Mara Leveritt

At a scheduling conference today in circuit court in Jonesboro, Judge David Laser ordered attorneys representing Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley Jr. to file briefs with him by Feb. 18 regarding issues to be addressed at the evidentiary hearing that was ordered last September by the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Laser said he was “giving this case priority” and that he wanted to “get this done as soon as possible.” Laser was appointed to hear the case because the previous judge, David Burnett, was elected to the state Senate.

The conference took place with some attorneys appearing in person and others by speaker phone. Ten lawyers participated in all — four for the state and two each for the three men, known as the West Memphis Three.

As issues to be considered were discussed, Laser said, “As I look at it, they [justices of the Supreme Court] basically want this case pre-tried through the court.” He added, “I’m certainly not limiting what can be presented. If there are additional issues or evidence that needs to come in, they will come in.”

Little Rock attorneys Jeff Rosenzweig, representing Misskelley, and Blake Hendrix, representing Baldwin, noted that unlike Echols, their clients still have appeals pending regarding their Rule 37 hearings to examine the adequacy of their counsel at their 1994 trials for the slayings of three West Memphis children.

Stephen Braga of Washington, D.C., the newly appointed lead attorney for Echols, agreed that while those appeals need to proceed, “No matter what happens to them, this hearing needs to go forward with regard to Echols.” Only Echols faces the death penalty. The other two are serving life sentences.

Laser responded, “Yes, that seems the way it ought to be.”

He told the attorneys, “Let’s operate on the assumption we’re going to move forward on all three cases to the extent we can.”

Attorneys for the three men noted that there was still some hair and fiber evidence that needs to be tested. They said the “intermingled” hairs were of human and other animal origin.

Attorney John Philipsborn of San Francisco, representing Baldwin, told the judge that at one point, after state and defense attorneys had agreed on evidence to be tested for DNA, “The state did some testing of its own.” Philipsborn asked that no party undertake potentially destructive testing of evidence without mutual knowledge and agreement.

Laser ordered that all testing will be “above the table.” The judge also put all attorneys under a gag order. “If a new trial is ordered, we will need to impanel a jury, so a gag order seems reasonable.” He then said he would prefer to “schedule the hearing more or less like an actual trial” and that he dates open in July, August and October.

All attorneys now have 45 days to submit briefs outlining issues they want to present and a schedule for the hearing.

New evidence, including allegations of juror misconduct and DNA findings, prompted the Supreme Court to order a new hearing for the men, whose convictions had previously been upheld. The hearing will decide whether they men deserve new trials.

Philipsborn's reference to other DNA testing, marked the first time that there’d been an official court reference to the fact that the attorney general did secret, additional DNA testing after no trace of the defendants turned up in the initial round of agreed-upon DNA testing. News of this leaked out inadvertently to the defense and it’s expected to be a subject of discussion in the Feb. 18 briefs. In the meanwhile, lawyers are gagged and attorney general working papers are not open to inspection. Three employees of the attorney general and Prosecuting Attorney Scott Ellington would not comment on the secret testing.

Tags: , , , , ,

Speaking of...

  • Dustin McDaniel goes Hog wild at ASU commencement

    May 17, 2012
    Attorney General Dustin McDaniel is getting blistered in some corners of the web for supposedly closing a commencement address Saturday at Arkansas State University in Jonesboro by saying "Go Indians" and "Go Hogs." /more/
  • Mike Ross not running for governor in 2014; to lobby instead

    May 14, 2012
    U.S. Rep. Mike Ross won't be running for governor in 2014. He's going to lobby for the Southwest Power Pool. This decision had been going around and I think Durango reported it pretty reliably in our comments thread over the weekend. /more/
  • Common Cause asks state probes of ALEC

    May 11, 2012
    With the American Legislative Exchange Council currently meeting in Charlotte with legislative stooges on plotting new corporate-agenda state legislation, Common Cause has called on state attorney generals to investigate ALEC for its compliance with tax and lobbying laws. /more/
  • Supreme Court grants hearing for Death Row's Timothy Howard

    April 26, 2012
    The Arkansas Supreme Court has ordered a further hearing on the DNA claim of a Death Row inmate, Timothy Howard, that state suppression of critical problems with DNA evidence prejudiced his fair trial. /more/
  • Tuesday night topics

    April 10, 2012
    The line is open. Closing out: * MAIN STREET BLUES: I wrote back in February that the Arkansas Redevelopment Authority wasn't happy about finances and tax payments on $1.8 million in redevelopment loans to Scott Reed, who had big plans for Main Street redevelopment that has so far primarily produced the troubled Porter's restaurant. /more/
  • Ellington on the WM3

    March 26, 2012
    Scott Ellington, the prosecuting attorney in the West Memphis Three hearing last year, told a Memphis TV station that he asked the defense to come up with a guilty plea offer that would allow Damien Echols, Jessie Miskelley and Jason Baldwin to go free. /more/
  • Jason Baldwin visits the Supreme Court

    March 21, 2012
    He writes: "You see, while I am innocent of the crime that sent me to prison most of the people there aren't (though I did meet others who actually are) and I made the decision long ago to treat these guys as people and not see them for the crimes that put them there. As a result I saw their humanity. I made friends with a lot of guys there who were juveniles when they committed their crimes. I grew up with them. We shared food, hopes, dreams and prayers. When I left I promised them all that I would not forget them. That is why I now not only fight for the innocent, to abolish the death penalty but I also fight for those youth who made a horrible mistake and realize that now." /more/
  • Jason Baldwin's new life in the west

    March 21, 2012
    Great little story in Seattle Weekly today about Jason Baldwin's efforts to rebuild his life in Seattle since he, Jessie Misskelley and Damien Echols were released from prison last summer. /more/
  • West Memphis Three reward fund increased to $200,000

    March 14, 2012
    An anonymous donor has added $100,000 to make a $200,000 reward fund for information leading to the killers of three West Memphis boys in 1993. /more/
  • Mark Darr: Hypocrite of the day

    March 6, 2012
    I mentioned yesterday Attorney General Dustin McDaniel's new website on consumer issues and advertising campaign for that effort supported by money he won in a lawsuit settlement. /more/
  • More »

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

"DALLAS — A Texas man declared innocent Tuesday after 30 years in prison could have cut short his prison stint twice and made parole – if only he would admit he was a sex offender.

But Cornelius Dupree Jr. refused to do so, doggedly maintaining his innocence in a 1979 rape and robbery, in the process serving more time for a crime he didn't commit than any other Texas inmate exonerated by DNA evidence.

"Whatever your truth is, you have to stick with it," Dupree, 51, said Tuesday, minutes after a Dallas judge overturned his conviction.
....
Under Texas compensation laws for the wrongly imprisoned, Dupree is eligible for $80,000 for each year he was behind bars, plus a lifetime annuity. He could receive $2.4 million in a lump sum that is not subject to federal income tax.

The compensation law, the nation's most generous, was passed in 2009 by the Texas Legislature after dozens of wrongly convicted men were released from prison. Texas has freed 41 wrongly convicted inmates through DNA since 2001 – more than any other state.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/04/c…

report   
Posted by eLwood on 01/04/2011 at 1:33 PM

Good for him. We need a similar law.

report   
Posted by ChildeRolandReturneth on 01/04/2011 at 5:09 PM

Good luck boys........My prayers are with you........The truth will set you free.

report   
Posted by angelfoot on 01/16/2011 at 10:23 PM

The truth will set you free? Not in this case. My opinion is, they're telling the truth, and they aren't guilty. If they WERE, guilty, and were to tell the truth about committing the crime, Damien would be killed.

report   
Posted by allforonex3 on 01/17/2011 at 2:13 AM

they need to be free they are not gilty you can see who the real siko is if you just look at the evedance it makes me feel unprotected from are police

report   
Posted by nicholed on 01/21/2011 at 5:43 AM

they do need to be released its wrong that these inoccent men are behind bars for a murder they honestly did not commit. the justice system is so messed up it makes me to feel unprotected by the police

report   
Posted by Natalie on 01/21/2011 at 9:27 AM

The way these murders were carried out fit Damien Echols to a tee, it defined his personality and his mental condition at the time. Echols, who was trying to impress his friends Baldwin and Jessie MissKelley by demanding to be sexually serviced by the three boys forgot that the other boys would tell their parents when they got home that they had been propositioned by him , so he then had to kill all three of the boys while at the same time exhibiting his perverse sexual desires by tying them up. This case completely makes the jury's decision an annoyance. Echols has undergone a total metamorphis from being a pure sociopath to a choir boy. He should have been executed 18 years ago.

report   
Posted by jbrauthor on 02/04/2011 at 1:49 PM

Where do you GET this stuff?

report   
Posted by springdale_liberal on 02/04/2011 at 1:57 PM

From the false and forced confession of a teenager that was disproved by physical evidence several times but was still allowed into evidence.

report   
Posted by beekie on 02/05/2011 at 5:47 AM

Sounds like jbrauthor was there! Maybe you should be behind bars too! If I'm not mistaken there were no signs of sexual abuse. It's not really the point if they are guilty or innocent..it's that they did not receive a fair trial. Burnett knows he was wrong for not letting them have a hearing on the new evidence. And Gitchel should be put behind bars when they have their new trial and it comes back innocent! Put yourself in their families shoes, how would you feel if your son was convicted of such a horrible crime and not given a suitable trial? Everyone deserves a fair trial no matter what their mental condition is or how their personality is defined!

report   
Posted by deesgirl2004 on 03/06/2011 at 11:00 PM

Apparantly you haven't read any of the "so-called" evidence against them! If you had you would realize all the things "used: against them for a speedy trial, to satisfy the police and community, and used not to see what really happened! How about you pretend you are even ONE of those men, now or even back then...and you know you didn't do it?? Would be a different story then, huh? I have read everything I can on the case and looked at all the pics and evidence available...there's NO WAY these three did this horrible thing! But SOMEONE did...and they are running FREE? WHAT ABOUT THAT? ..... There TRULY are people in PRISON that are NOT GUILTY! And I believe these 3 are INNOCENT IN THIS CASE! Even Pam Hobbs BELIEVES they are and she is one parent of a child that was murdered! Why do you think that? State brought in so-called EXPERTS that didn't even have proper credentials... the list goes on and on...how this got manipulated! Please go read ALL the evidence ...and get a clearer picture of this whole mess! Set the record straight Arkansas...FREE THE WM3!

report   
Posted by DaisyMay59 on 04/27/2011 at 4:33 AM

Well Daisymay I didn't know you posted here, LOL. Good job on explaining it Mama, what do you all think about the CA case, some similarities here, except the CA case has more circumstantial evidence compared to this one....

report   
Posted by toadie on 06/20/2011 at 1:39 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Author

  • New wrinkle in Fred Smith ballot case

    AP is reporting that Chicot Circuit Judge Sam Pope has ruled that former state Rep. Fred Smith successfully completed a probationary sentence on a felony theft conviction a year ago and the charge against him has been dismissed.
    • Mar 15, 2012
  • Highway Department floats new Broadway Bridge proposal

    The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department floated a new proposal today for replacement of the Broadway Bridge.
    • May 14, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation