Rep. Ed Garner has put off plans to seek Senate committee approval Wednesday of his tax break for rich people. The drum-beating from Koch brother lobbyists indicates the new priority is Sen. Missy Irvin's bill to hamstring federal health care reform. Shades of interposition, it asserts that the federal government can't direct state officials to administer a federal program. (I presume the language is lifted whole from a Republican/Koch think tank somewhere.) It says a state agency must be legislatively authorized to do anything. Even if authority exists, the bill imposes a whole range of requirements, including cost estimates, for each specific program.
This is what the 'baggers would otherwise call an unfunded mandate. Irvin would waste a significant amount of state time and money, all in the name of standing in the way of delivery of more health care to more Arkansans.
She might have the votes in the Senate. The House? It might face a tougher committee there.
That same committee may get a crack at another dangerous piece of Irvin legislation. She opposes a woman's right to choose an abortion and is doing all she can to make the practice unobtainable in Arkansas. One is legislation aimed at ending drug-induced abortions here. She cloaks this anti-abortion bill in concern about the side effects of the drug used (is there a drug that doesn't have potential side effects and isn't always accompanied by sufficient patient and physician consideration, from antibiotics to Viagra?). But by piling burdensome requirements on physicians and clinics — along with numerous reporting requirements — she's intending to stop the prescription of this drug in Arkansas. She evinces no similar concern for inspections, reporting, hospital admitting privileges and all the rest for all the other drugs out there. Or maybe her legislation should include the recent British medical recommendation that women be counseled that abortion is safer than childbirth.
Showing 1-4 of 4
::sigh:: To think, they could be passing bills to raise the minimum wage, increase the amount of money for higher education, etc. but no...let's focus on crap like this.
If you don't like abortion, let's work on reducing unwanted and unplanned pregnancy. Shouldn't they be filing a bill to make health insurance companies cover birth control pills, IUDS, etc.? I mean if we can get insurance companies to pay for Viagra, surely the ladies can get contraception covered.
I long for the day when a legislative session will be productive and not full of bills that just win the legislator a little bit of pull with a small group of people.
I think most Arkansans would be supportive of a bill to raise the minimum wage and a bill that would make insurance companies cover birth control pills, IUDs, etc.....that's just me though.
I don't need a bunch of Arkansas legislatirs trying to shove "their brand" of Christianity down my throat. My first thought on those 5 dwarfs at the Iowa religious conference yesterday was that we were going to elect a chief theologican, not a president.
Do what you want in your family but keep my family out of it. It is not your business what happens in someone else's family and I certainly don't need a bunch of pseudo-christians (small "C" intended) trying to run the world.
Remind her that this country was founded to get away from religious nuts who tried to shove their religion down other people's throats.
Churches are tax exempt for a reason. They're not asked to pay taxes so they keep their opinions in their churches and among their respective congregations and OUT of government at any level. They are simply incapable of seeing the bigger picture beyond their own interpretation of the Bible. This is why church and state are separated. We have only to look to England to see how screwed up a country can become when the church is left in charge for far too long. After all, the Church of England is why we're in this part of the world, right?
Now, if the churches want a say, then let's remove the tax exemptions. All of them. That could solve a lot of financial issues in this country if we just tax the churches to the max. They can apparently afford it. And maybe we'd see fewer monstrosities like Fort God in West Little Rock, that embarrassment of riches on the hill thumbing it's nose to the poor and needy.
If you want a say, you gotta pay. That should be our mantra.
Someone mentioned to me that Rep. Garner attends one of the top three liberal Methodist churches. I've been to this church. I've heard their sermons. And all I can think about is what is Rep. Garner hearing that I'm not hearing, or vice-versa. And its not a knock on his religion or his Christianity, just a sense of a disconnect. I wonder if the pastor reads the paper about these bills and thinks that he/she is not really doing a good job preaching on that whole least of my people idea.
I have to disagree with you Durango. They weren't pathetic papers. They were quintessential local…
“Conviction or no conviction, Thompson has paid a heavy price in publicity alone.”
Undeniably…
“Since the merger . . . subscribers have received The Morning News and the Northwest…
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings