Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Supreme Court members feted by key lawyer

Posted by Max Brantley on Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:19 AM

They don't call the U.S. Supreme Court supreme for nothing. Ethical rules don't apply to them. Clarence Thomas' household can be enriched by payments from people with many direct interests in cases before the court, for example

Then there was this in the LA Times this week:

The day the Supreme Court gathered behind closed doors to consider the politically divisive question of whether it would hear a challenge to President Obama’s healthcare law, two of its justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, were feted at a dinner sponsored by the law firm that will argue the case before the high court.

The Bancroft law firm was one of the sponsors of the Federalist Society dinner honoring Scalia and Thomas. Paul Clement of that law firm likely will argue the case to strike down the health care reform law. Clement is also a leader in legal efforts to bar marriage for gay people and to enforce Arizona's punitive anti-immigration law. He can get a big howdy from his pals should he argue those cases, too.

In a sense, it doesn't matter. The Scalia-Thomas votes could have been mailed in.

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

.

While yesterday Mz Bates found your Newt-Samonite remark outstanding, today
I find this one deserving of the archives:

"In a sense, it doesn't matter. The Scalia-Thomas votes could have been mailed in."

Lest anyone entertain any pretense of a "living Constitution."

report   
Posted by eLwood on 11/16/2011 at 7:35 AM

write something about the lesbo Kagan who will sit on the Obama care case, even though she has stated she favored the law when she was a solicitor general. Biased Brantley at it again

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by November on 11/16/2011 at 7:41 AM

And Kagan is a "lesbo" why?

Is this the best that Rushminds can conjure?

report   
Posted by eLwood on 11/16/2011 at 7:50 AM

Didn't you know, eLwood? She was added to the Supreme Court to improve their softball team. Therefore she is a lesbian.

report   
Posted by John A Arkansawyer on 11/16/2011 at 8:04 AM

I have no problem with the dinner. It likely was scheduled long ago and perhaps is even an annual event. If the Federalist Society is going to hail these men, the honorees may as well be there. And, as Max says, these are two votes the anti healthcare reform folks can take to the bank. I'd be okay with the ACLU or NAACP honoring a justice; I'm fine with the Federalist Society doing so at what turns out to be an historic moment.

Now, the funding of Mr. Justice Thomas's household by anti reform elements is a horse of a different color. . . . .

report   
Posted by Tap on 11/16/2011 at 8:07 AM

Methinks I remember some discussion in conservative circles about Kagan recusing from the case. Apparently that meme did not test well in Frank Luntz's focus groups.

Can you imagine what the republican noise machine would do if Breyer/Kagan attended a similar luncheon with a group of liberal lawyers? The world would stop. The media would MELTDOWN with questions of impropriety, etc...

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by joesixpack on 11/16/2011 at 8:12 AM

Sigh! They are all for sale!

report   
Posted by coda70 on 11/16/2011 at 8:20 AM

This is why I send a token to the ACLU every year. If these two do not recuse, I hope the ACLU will go after them. When they do, I'll add to my token.

report   
Posted by Verla Sweere on 11/16/2011 at 9:07 AM

Max is right. It doesn't matter a bit that the Scalia-Thomas twins are bottom-feeding with the Federalists. They have already voted.

report   
Posted by Silverback66 on 11/16/2011 at 9:42 AM

Whether Kagan is lesbo or not doesn't matter, if her personal opinion favors the health care law doesn't matter. What matters is she can make an unbiased decision based on the constitution, Scalia-Thomas not so much.

report   
Posted by Hackett on 11/16/2011 at 9:58 AM

Hate to spoil your narrative, Max.

http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/…

And TAP, are you equally concerned about Kagan's conflict?

report   
Posted by Contrarian on 11/16/2011 at 6:23 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Author

  • Pipelines over people

    Meet Julia Trigg Crawford, a Texas farmer. She doesn't want the Keystone XL pipeline to cross her property and imperil her water supply.
    • May 8, 2012
  • The morning news roundup

    I was a touch surprised that no news organization, including the daily newspaper — which has covered the subject extensively in the past — picked up the news reported here yesterday that a taxpayer lawsuit now seems likely to end the practice of state legislators supplementing their paychecks unconstitutionally with undocumented expense reimbursements.
    • Mar 10, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation