They don't call the U.S. Supreme Court supreme for nothing. Ethical rules don't apply to them. Clarence Thomas' household can be enriched by payments from people with many direct interests in cases before the court, for example
Then there was this in the LA Times this week:
The day the Supreme Court gathered behind closed doors to consider the politically divisive question of whether it would hear a challenge to President Obama’s healthcare law, two of its justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, were feted at a dinner sponsored by the law firm that will argue the case before the high court.
The Bancroft law firm was one of the sponsors of the Federalist Society dinner honoring Scalia and Thomas. Paul Clement of that law firm likely will argue the case to strike down the health care reform law. Clement is also a leader in legal efforts to bar marriage for gay people and to enforce Arizona's punitive anti-immigration law. He can get a big howdy from his pals should he argue those cases, too.
In a sense, it doesn't matter. The Scalia-Thomas votes could have been mailed in.
Showing 1-11 of 11
.
While yesterday Mz Bates found your Newt-Samonite remark outstanding, today
I find this one deserving of the archives:
"In a sense, it doesn't matter. The Scalia-Thomas votes could have been mailed in."
Lest anyone entertain any pretense of a "living Constitution."
write something about the lesbo Kagan who will sit on the Obama care case, even though she has stated she favored the law when she was a solicitor general. Biased Brantley at it again
Didn't you know, eLwood? She was added to the Supreme Court to improve their softball team. Therefore she is a lesbian.
I have no problem with the dinner. It likely was scheduled long ago and perhaps is even an annual event. If the Federalist Society is going to hail these men, the honorees may as well be there. And, as Max says, these are two votes the anti healthcare reform folks can take to the bank. I'd be okay with the ACLU or NAACP honoring a justice; I'm fine with the Federalist Society doing so at what turns out to be an historic moment.
Now, the funding of Mr. Justice Thomas's household by anti reform elements is a horse of a different color. . . . .
Methinks I remember some discussion in conservative circles about Kagan recusing from the case. Apparently that meme did not test well in Frank Luntz's focus groups.
Can you imagine what the republican noise machine would do if Breyer/Kagan attended a similar luncheon with a group of liberal lawyers? The world would stop. The media would MELTDOWN with questions of impropriety, etc...
This is why I send a token to the ACLU every year. If these two do not recuse, I hope the ACLU will go after them. When they do, I'll add to my token.
Max is right. It doesn't matter a bit that the Scalia-Thomas twins are bottom-feeding with the Federalists. They have already voted.
Whether Kagan is lesbo or not doesn't matter, if her personal opinion favors the health care law doesn't matter. What matters is she can make an unbiased decision based on the constitution, Scalia-Thomas not so much.
Hate to spoil your narrative, Max.
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/…
And TAP, are you equally concerned about Kagan's conflict?
I couldn't agree more! But the flavor I love the most is Death by Chocolate!…
I think about this print stuff a lot and believe I see the future though…
It is indeed sad to see the Times-Picayune in such a reduced state. The depressing…
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings