Thursday, December 1, 2011

Attorney seeks reports by cop in beating case

Posted by Max Brantley on Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:22 AM

Keith Hall, attorney for Chris Erwin, has taken a new legal approach to getting documents about previous use of force by Little Rock Police Lt. David Hudson. Hudson, who was working as a security guard at Ferneau restaurant in Hillcrest, was filmed repeatedly punching Erwin in the face after Erwin asked why he was being asked to leave a Halloween party in the restaurant. Erwin was arrested on a variety of charges and Hall has been seeking information about Hudson through a Freedom of Information Act request.

On four occasions, Hudson has filed required reports on use of force. The police department has refused to release those reports to Hudson. It contends they are exempt from the FOI. Judge Wendell Griffen has ordered the documents released, but the city has refused, saying it will appeal the order.

New approach: Hall has now filed a "discovery" motion in the criminal trial for the same reports. The rules, he thinks, should require production of the material. I wonder, too, if the department has any record of past citizen complaints against Erwin. Records on such complaints are open to public inspection.

Hall also said the disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and trespass case against Erwin has been transferred, without explanation, from Judge Alice Lightle's District Court in Little Rock to the district court in Sherwood.

UPDATE: I requested records of any citizen complaints against Hudson. The police provided two — one by Ralph Jackson, who said Hudson threw him to the ground and spit on him in 2009, and the other by Jay Parks, who said Hudson used excessive force. Full files on investigations, if any, were not included. The form said Jackson's complaint was withdrawn and Hudson was "exonerated" in the Parks complaint. These were both cases in which Hudson reported having used force in arrests.

UPDATE II: The city is refusing my FOI request to release underlying investigation documents about the citizen complaints. They call THESE personnel records. If that's so, I don't see how they can release the complaints themselves. This is wrong any way you slice it. The only way the police can be accountable is if we know a citizen complaint gets a fair hearing. We have no way of knowing that with this procedure.

UPDATE III: Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen today refused to stay his ruling ordering records about Hudson's use of force open to Hall. Presumably, the city will fight to the bitter end to shield police from accountability.

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

Citizen review of police actions is long overdue.

report 3 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by eLwood on 12/01/2011 at 11:40 AM

How would the Sherwood court have jurisdiction?

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Perplexed on 12/01/2011 at 12:50 PM

The districts courts in Pulaski have countywide jurisdiction.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Max Brantley on 12/01/2011 at 1:05 PM

The "blue wall" reconstitutes as stone again. One starts to wonder who is more adept at precluding transparency in legal actions criminals or the police?????!!!!!

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by dottholliday on 12/01/2011 at 1:07 PM

Interesting.... so you can go court shopping even within the county.

report 1 like, 2 dislikes   
Posted by Perplexed on 12/01/2011 at 1:08 PM

Max, do you know who requested the case be moved from Little Rock District Court to Sherwood District Court?? The Prosecution? The Defense? Judge Lightle? Is Jegley's office handling the prosecution? Inquiring mind would like to know....

report   
Posted by olered on 12/01/2011 at 1:34 PM

I appreciate Max and the AT keeping this story and Abuse of Power in general in the limelight. Keep up the good work!

report 3 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by olered on 12/01/2011 at 4:02 PM

m

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by momma on 12/01/2011 at 7:51 PM

Wow. Using discovery in a legal action is craaaaaazy

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by My cousin vinny on 12/01/2011 at 8:02 PM

As I think Vinny was trying to say, this is the way we used to do in court proceedings. It was only with Edmark vs. the City of Fayetteville that the Arkansas supreme Court allowed attorneys to circumvent the discovery rules of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure by resorting to the Freedom of Information Act. Even though I am a strong advocate of the Freedom of Information Act, I have always felt that Edmark was a wrong decision, and that lawyers should not be allowed to use it in lawsuits to circumvent the established Rules of Civil Procedure.

report   
Posted by plainjim on 12/01/2011 at 9:41 PM

One good use of all that new tax money might be proper training and more importantly, vetting, of officer candidates for LRPD. Cops have to put up with a lot of abuse and work odd hours for sure, but if you don't have people suited for the job, you end up with recruits who are hot heads or control freaks which turn out to be cops who regularly use excessive force.

report   
Posted by Tortie_Tude on 01/12/2012 at 10:27 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Author

  • Fox News — dangerous to your learning

    I'll just throw this out and step back so that mud throwing may begin. Survey says, in summary: Fox News watchers are less informed.
    • May 24, 2012
  • Beebe bounces head of Veterans Affairs

    The Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs, mired in a mess over overcharges to veterans in the residential facility it operates in Little Rock, will have new leadership.
    • May 14, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation