Friday, December 2, 2011

UPDATE II: Judge Hart confirms Supreme Court race

Posted by Max Brantley on Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM

UPDATE ON AN ITEM LAST NIGHT: I now have five different people telling me that they expect Court of Appeals Judge Jo Hart to run for a vacancy on the Arkansas Supreme Court next year and that she's made arrangements with campaign consultants for the race. But I haven't been able to reach Hart herself. She'd run for the open seat for which Court of Appeals Judge Raymond Abramson had previously announced. Other trial court judges are reportedly considering the race.

Court races are only occasionally lively, but they are important. The business lobby is increasingly turning attention to them, in fact, precisely because of their importance.

UPDATE II: Judge Hart called me this afternoon and confirmed that she’ll be making the race and plans a formal announcement soon.

“I’m just convinced that they need some experience on that court and I think I have that experience,” She said. Hart, 68, has been on the bench more than 20 years. Her current opponent has served about a year by appointment. She said she didn't intend to run a campaign that focused on whoever her opposition might be. “I’m just of the firm belief that contested races are good for the people,” she said. “They should have a choice.”

She said she preferred elections to appointment for judges and said her first term was spent on a court with a blend of appointees and elected judges. “I’m convinced the best judges come through election,” she said.

She said it was unfortunate that judicial campaign financing so often depended on lawyers’ contributions, but said she recused from cases involving lawyers to whom she was closest. She noted that she’d contributed significant amounts of her own money to past races and expected she’d do so again this year, though she said she hoped the campaign was more about getting around meeting people than an expensive media campaign.

Tags: , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Judicial elections are scrutinized by many special interest groups on the right and left because court decisions are used to bypass the legislature to make policy changes. Everyone knows that.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by SHolmes on 12/02/2011 at 10:36 AM

Strange: If "everyone knows that," why is it important, or even necessary to tell us?

Just wonderin'.

report   
Posted by SkyPilot on 12/02/2011 at 2:28 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

More by Author

  • Horse racing and casinos, a sometimes deadly mix

    The New York Times has a gruesome report today on thoroughbred horse racing in the era of a proliferation of race track casinos.
    • Apr 30, 2012
  • The Sunday line

    Over to you. I scheduled this for posting before heading off to Commander's Palace and then the drive home.
    • Apr 15, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation