Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Highway Commission reneges on redistricting promise

Posted by Max Brantley on Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM

The Arkansas Highway Commission voted 5-0 today to renege on its promise to redraw the highway districts each commissioner represents to equalize population. The Commission had promised to redistrict in return for Sen. Jeremy Hutchinson's agreement to drop a push for a constitutional amendment to end Highway Department independence.

The commission is, in short, a pack of liars. They claimed they couldn't come up with a map, but any high school kid with a computer and the right software could have devised a map to give each commissioner's two so-called "advocacy districts" roughly equal population. As it stands now, Commission Chair Madison Murphy of El Dorado gets $5 million to divide up among the 400,000 people his districts represent against the same money for the million or so people in Dick Trammel's Northwest Arkansas districts. Murphy has opposed equalizing the districts from the start. You can see why. Legislators have argued it's a simple equal representation issue.

Even legislators not on board Hutchinson's original proposal don't like high-handed state agencies that believe their power exceeds that of all the other branches of the government. (Remember the Game and Fish Commission flap?) There will be repercussions. Perhaps not in the fiscal session in 2012, but certainly in 2013 unless the Highway Commission rethinks. I understand members are already getting an earful.

Murphy tried to say the argument was about spending strictly on population, which he said wasn't sound practice. It's not sound practice, but that's not the argument here. Some money is divided up based on districts, but an overwhelming majority is allocated statewide based on defined needs. Hutchinson has said he didn't seek a change in funding formulas, but merely in the population placed in each of the 10 districts.

The Stephens article suggests the Commission only promised to study redistricting back in the session. Documents show, however, that the commission was "committed" to creating districts of equal population. The unsigned document at the link was created to signal the commission's commitment and it was reported verbatim at the time. Following it on the link is the formal order.

PS — The Commission today also fired its long-time counsel Robert Wilson. He'd earlier sued over what he called the effective firing of being suspended without pay over his paid leave policies for people in his office beyond standard agency leave rules. He has contended the extra leave was suggested by superiors at the agency.

Tags: , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

it is time to elect the commission

report 2 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by bobbyt on 12/14/2011 at 5:52 PM

This is another unintended consequence of term limits. Even the Highway Commission did not dare just lie to the General Assembly when Ed Thicksten, Ode Maddox, John Miller, Knox Nelson, and Jodie Mahony, etc were going to be back with long memories and longer futures.

report 4 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Theodosius on 12/14/2011 at 6:42 PM

Correct, Theo. At least over here in the western hinterlands we got a little paint splashed occasionally our way but that's about all over with in these days of no local legislator with any clout.

report   
Posted by Cato on 12/14/2011 at 7:15 PM

Isn't it about time that we put the Highway Commission back under the control of the Governor and the General Assembly, where at least they are answerable to someone. The Mack-Blackwell Amendment, which made the Highway Commission independent, was intended to end political interference with road-building in Arkansas. Can we really say that it has done that? If its independence was stripped, at least it would be answerable every four years in the election for governor. Is that bad?

report 5 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by plainjim on 12/14/2011 at 9:11 PM

It's the AGFC commission you have to worry about
The commission was setup as an advisory
Panel, not a board of directors.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Bob on 12/15/2011 at 12:29 AM

This is the example of political power. The problem may not be the structure of the commission. It's more the content of the character of its members.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by sfret on 12/15/2011 at 8:54 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Author

  • Gates Foundation drops support of ALEC

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has joined Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Kraft and Intuit in dropping financial support of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
    • Apr 10, 2012
  • Re-Occupy Little Rock: Today's report

    I wrote a column this week about the fact that Robert Johnston had said he intended to reinstitute the Occupy Little Rock demonstration at 4th and Ferry with a weekly sit-in.
    • May 24, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation