Wednesday, February 8, 2012

More evidence that ethics law must be fixed

Posted by Max Brantley on Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:53 AM

Further evidence that the state Ethics Commission should have erred on the side of common sense and good ethics — and not syntactical sophistry — in reversing a staff finding and dismissing my complaint that the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce-backed campaign for a Little Rock sales tax violated state financial disclosure law by reporting campaign spending to its consultants, the Markham Group, and little else. The money washed through the Markham Group to advertising, mailings and other expenses unknown.

The Ethics Commission says it hopes to tighten up the law and make clear that issue campaigns should itemize spending just as political candidates must do. Meanwhile, transparency in campaign spending is non-existent.

Latest example that comes to hand — from a chamber of commerce, naturally. These boys —- and I do generally mean boys — simply don't believe in public disclosure. Just yesterday, the Little Rock Chamber refused to provide the Times documents circulating among Little Rock Technology Authority members about proposals to be the engineer to clear-cut a neighborhood for a new technology center. The chamber has them. The authority has them. The unwashed public? MYOB. (UPDATE: Copies of the data on engineers has just begun arriving about 1 p.m. today, following some support fromJoel Anderson, chancellor at UALR, who appointed a couple of the board members.)

Today, we have the Springdale Business and School Alliance ethical filing. The primary backer is the Springdale Chamber of Commerce — a $62,000 contribution on the June report, for example. It was established to pass a school millage last May. A June 9 report, filed after the election, showed these expenditures for the election month:

* $72 in expenses to a law firm.

* $99,008.15 to the Cranford Johnson Robinson Woods office in Northwest Arkansas for "consulting services."

That's it.

That ain't transparency.

Fix the law.

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

No where else to put this. Here's Ellen pushing back on the Million Moms who are really only 40,000. Take a look at her audience----a perfect snapshot of real American women.

http://www.eonline.com/videos/ellen-peek-2…

report 3 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by the outlier on 02/08/2012 at 10:30 AM

How does the city (even the state) end up paying a lobbying organization? This seems backwards. The city fathers used to take bribes. Now they pay them.

report 4 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Verla Sweere on 02/08/2012 at 10:56 AM

If UALR and UAMS have a role on the Authority, then the records are open to the public. FOI one of them.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by cecil on 02/08/2012 at 11:54 AM

While I appreciate the rare spotlight on this blight the AR Blog provides... the suggested solutions seem to simply negotiate around the margins rather than honestly try to establish ethical governance.

First we need to simply outlaw taxation/direct funding of exra-govornmental entities such as this (chamber or advertising promotion boards, etc.) altogether. Either government does this itself with completely open and transparent operations and accounting or it should not be done with any public monies.

As for current "reporting" there is simply no good reason with technology available today that all financial info (bank, financial transactions) and pertinent correspondence cannot be posted on the web, archived in perpetuity, instantly or within hours for all to see.

report 1 like, 1 dislike   
Posted by Eureka Springs on 02/08/2012 at 12:18 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Author

  • TGIF open line

    An open line, including details on ALEC lobbying activities, a sex-for-drugs arrest, a vote on a judicial vacancy and more.
    • Apr 27, 2012
  • State arguing both ways on school choice

    Anybody else notice this paradox? A federal lawsuit arising in Malvern challenges the state's decision to deny transfers based on potential racial impact.
    • Apr 16, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2012 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation