Thursday, June 28, 2012

Democratic 3rd district candidate's resume padding

Posted by on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:25 AM

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette today got to the bottom, apparently, of questions about the military record of Ken Aden, the Democrat waging the lost-cause battle against U.S. Rep. Steve Womack in the Third Congressional District. Aden is a veteran of service in a combat zone and holds the combat infantryman badge as well as a parachutist badge, but he apparently didn't meet all the qualifying tests for Special Forces, a service he had directly claimed in documents, nor was he a Green Beret, a claim that he mentioned at least once in a speech but isn't made in campaign materials I can reference. The D-G also couldn't find record of an associate degree he claimed from Arkansas State University.

Sad in any number of ways, not the least because his military record was admirable enough, as Womack acknowledged in the article before piling on.

“He served his country in a combat theater,” said Womack. “That’s something I haven’t done, and it’s an honorable accomplishment. But to go beyond that accomplishment and suggest that you are a member of the Special Forces community, if not true, that’s a pretty serious breach of trust.

COINCIDENTALLY: The U.S. Supreme Court today affirmed a California case in which the 9th Circuit held that a statute setting criminal penalties for misrepresenting one's military record was unconstitutional. The so-called "stolen valor" case concerned an elected official who'd falsely claimed to be a Medal of Honor recipient.

Tags: ,

Speaking of Ken Aden, Steve Womack

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Has Arkansas deregulated guns or not?

    John Lyon of Stephens Media examines at some length today a simmering topic in the gun nut community that is of general interest.
    • May 8, 2013
  • A word about ethics

    If the Arkansas legislature won't fix this small matter, it's not likely to do anything about public ethics at all.
    • Feb 21, 2013
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
  • Re: Martha Shoffner buzz

    • I would guess that the vast majority of folks in the jury pool have never…

    • on May 20, 2013
  • Re: Martha Shoffner buzz

    • So Max how would Shoffner gain from legal PAC contributions not being listed on campaign…

    • on May 20, 2013
  • Re: Martha Shoffner buzz

    • Guilt by (attorney) association? Do some attorneys develop a reputation for representing guilty people to…

    • on May 20, 2013

Blogroll

 

© 2013 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation