Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Tech Park Authority announces site criteria UPDATE

Posted By on Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM

techpark.JPG

The Little Rock Technology Park Authority has announced that it has developed criteria for potential sites of the city taxpayer-financed building that is envisioned as a lure for private technology ventures.

Information for potential sites must be submitted by Aug. 31.

The Authority, a creation of a law developed by the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce and run administratively by the chamber, has been enmeshed in controversy since targeting three residential neighborhoods between UAMS and UALR for the project. The Little Rock City Board, which is providing the money ($22 million from a sales tax increase pushed in a campaign run by the chamber), urged a wider search for property that wouldn't dislocate neighborhoods.

The full news release is on the jump. In it, the release from Authority Chair Mary Good said of the original sites:

Although the three sites are not now being considered, the reports’ recommendations for building placements, appropriate phase build out, utility utilization, etc., will be of use for whatever site is ultimately chosen. These issues and the environmental questions — both aesthetic and practical — will be the subject of the Board’s discussion at the August meeting.

The site submission criteria are listed here. They are general attributes for each site, rather than a set of requirements that sites meet certain rules, such as minimum acreage or, say, a minimum driving time from UALR and UAMS. That short drive previously had been a firm desire of the Authority Board, but it has been roundly criticized by the city board, residents and UAMS, which has withheld its payment to the tech park effort because of concerns over site selection. Clearly, however, location could end up influencing Authority members when they make a decision. Good has made it clear several times that she could envision a scenario in which the residential neighborhoods might yet be considered, though city officials, the latest being Mayor Mark Stodola, seemed to have ruled that out.

I have made an FOI request for the final engineering firm report on the three original sites. It has been completed and the news release said it would be posted on the Tech Park website, but it is not there currently.

A number of property owners have suggested alternate sites. Drawing high attention has been commercial acreage on the east side of Interstate 30 downtown near the Clinton Library, Heifer International and Acxiom headquarters.

UPDATE: This Tech Park can't, or won't, shoot straight.

I asked Jay Chesshir, the chamber boss who's running the Tech Park show generally, about the seeming lack of specifics in the so-called criteria, such as minimums for acreage, distance from institutions and the like. He sent me this note:

As has been requested, all Little Rock sites will be considered. The document asks for all of those things you’ve mentioned.

I followed up and asked, just to be clear, that the criteria actually weren't criteria at all, in a commonly understood sense, merely a request for information. He didn't respond. But that's all people with potential sites received in letters inviting them to provide the general information.

But then Chair Mary Good responded to a question from Leslie Peacock about criteria:

There is some confusion about the one page sheet that went out with the news release this morning. That sheet is the factual cover sheet for those folks recommending a Park site. The criteria for evaluating the sites are being finalized by the committee. I expect their final copy this week (maybe tomorrow) and it will be posted on the web site and I will send you a copy.
Mary Good

In short, the news release was in error, from the very first sentence. And misleading. And people with land to sell have already been sent letters about filling in the barebones "criteria" list without any mention that the real criteria are yet to come.

TECH PARK NEWS RELEASE

Little Rock Technology Park Authority Chairman Dr. Mary Good today announced the criteria for all potential site submissions to be considered for development of the Little Rock Technology Park.

The criteria were created by a Chairman-appointed Board committee of Dickson Flake and Michael Douglas, in consultation with Charlie Dilks, the Board’s site consultant. Criteria include information required by the Board in order to evaluate each potential site.

The criteria will be posted on the Authority’s website — www.lrtechpark.com — and sent to all sponsors of the Park and all interested parties who have contacted the Board regarding prospective sites.

As Authority sponsors have requested, Board Member Dickson Flake will also contact commercial real estate brokers throughout central Arkansas in order to make them aware of the Board’s interest in reviewing any and all Little Rock sites which may be available. Through this proactive Board action, a thorough search will be conducted.

Site information is due by August 31, 2012 and may be delivered to the Little Rock Technology Park Authority, c/o Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce, One Chamber Plaza, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201.

The final report on the original three sites has been submitted to the Board by the engineering firm, Crafton Tull & Associates, Inc. The report will be posted at www.lrtechpark.com. Although the three sites are not now being considered, the reports’ recommendations for building placements, appropriate phase build out, utility utilization, etc., will be of use for whatever site is ultimately chosen. These issues and the environmental questions — both aesthetic and practical — will be the subject of the Board’s discussion at the August meeting.

The Board Chair reported that there will be no July meeting. The August meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 15th at 4:00 p.m. at a location to be determined.

Chairman Good also announced the Neighborhood Housing Committee will convene its first meeting on Tuesday, July 24th at 5:00 p.m. at the Willie L. Hinton Neighborhood Resource Center.

CORRECTION NOTICE FROM CHAMBER

In a release earlier today, a Site Submission Form required of all parties submitting potential sites for the Little Rock Technology Park was erroneously labeled “criteria.”
 
Authority Board Members Dickson Flake and Dr. Michael Douglas are continuing their work with the Authority’s consultant, Charlie Dilks, regarding establishment of uniform criteria. Once complete, the criteria will be released to the public via a news release and on www.lrtechpark.com. Meanwhile, the Form will provide consistent information on each submitted site so that each may be fairly and equally considered.
 
We apologize for this miscommunication.

Tags: , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
    • Apr 20, 2017
  • Death Row inmates argue to keep stay of execution in place; urge 8th Circuit not to 'rush' analysis

    Early this morning, attorneys for nine Death Row inmates, filed an argument with the 8th United States Court of Appeals contesting the state's effort to override Judge Kristine Baker's order Saturday that halted executions scheduled this month.
    • Apr 17, 2017
  • Federal judge denies execution stay for Don Davis but larger stay continues

    Don Davis, who's been moved to the killing facility of the state prison for killing tonight at 7 p.m. if a stay of execution is lifted in another federal suit, sought a stay in another federal court Sunday, but the request was denied.
    • Apr 17, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Most Viewed

  • Lee's lawyer writes about executed man's last hours

    Lee Short, the lawyer for Ledell Lee, the man Arkansas put to death just before midnight last night, posted on Facebook the following letter of thanks for personal support and a bit about Lee's last hours, distributing his possessions and talking to family.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation