Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Friday, July 13, 2012

Technology Park siting criteria posted

Posted By on Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM

ONE ALTERNATIVE: This potential site has been mentioned for the Technology Park.
  • Kai Caddy
  • ONE ALTERNATIVE: This potential site has been mentioned for the Technology Park.

After some confusion earlier, the Little Rock Technology Park Authority has announced release of "site measurement criteria" for the place the authority will build an office building with $22 million in city tax money under authority granted by legislation written and promoted by the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce. The idea is for the building to attract private businesses.

Today's list, a bit longer than what was released earlier, is a list of factors that will be considered in selecting a site, but it sets no specific requirements in any of the individual areas. You can see the full list on the jump. For example: it asks those with potential sites to identify the proximity and "convenience" to research institutions, but doesn't set fixed limits on what's expected in those categories. The Authority's original insistence on a five-minute drive time between the site and either UAMS or UALR had caused great controversy and scoffing from city officials.

The release today came with the following statement from Charlie Dilks, the consultant hired by the Tech Authority (an independent board dominated by people with connection to the Chamber of Commerce and business establishment):

"The research and technology park industry is now over 40 years old, and a lot has been learned about the various criteria that have led to their success or failure.

"The goal is to create lively, mixed-use, amenity-rich environments around the intersection of university research and private industry. Successful parks promote the collaborative, entrepreneurial culture that is essential to innovation and the transfer of technology and cutting-edge research into commercial applications.

"As the board reviews alternative site locations, a list of criteria needs to be agreed upon in order to judge them. The criteria attached should be the template to be used for this evaluation. Weighing land site criteria and scoring them implies precision and objectivity. It should be understood, however, that a numerical selection process could lead to bad conclusions and high probability of failure.

"In the end, sound judgment based on experience of successful parks needs to be qualitatively made, and it should be noted that some of the site qualifications may be altered by investment such as infrastructure capacity, configuration, establishment of anchor institutions, and quality management whereas other sites, due to external conditions, may be less subject to change.

"After evaluating alternative sites for the park for probability of success, you may then test the best sites against the locational considerations to determine if the effects are positive or negative in the short and long runs."

The consultant and the Authority Board had from the start favored sites in the residential neighborhood between UAMS and UALR, generally a low-income area with a high minority population. Residents organized opposition to the plan and that prompted the City Board, which controls the money, to urge the Tech Authority to seek alternative sites. It's been a bumpy process, with a reluctance of some Authority leaders to let go of the original residential neighborhoods. Mayor Mark Stodola indicated to me yesterday his belief that the residential neighborhoods are off the table — though he added that a different, collaborative approach might have produced a different outcome had the process begun differently. Stodola has said positive things about a downtown site, east of Interstate 30, on commercial property near the Clinton Library and Heifer International. Those institutions and Acxiom have promoted the site, along with Lion World Services, which controls a 10-acre tract at its core that it no longer plans to use for a new center for its instruction program for the blind.

Board Chair Mary Good confirmed to me that the authority avoided setting specific requirements in each area because, for example, it would make no sense to reject a 29.8 acre site that fit all other desires but fell a fraction of an acre short of the optimal size.

Technology Park Site Measurement Criteria

1. SITE
Size
Configuration
Access
Exposure
Known or suspected environmental hazards
Traffic Patterns, transportation service
Proximity to research institutions
Convenience to research institutions
Other surrounding amenities
Zoning
Infrastructure capacity
Surrounding arterials
Utility Service
Telecom Service
Natural features
Cost
Acquisition
Development

2. LOCATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Displacement
Residential uses
Business Uses
Institutional
Effect on surrounding neighbors/development patterns

Tags: , ,

Speaking of...

  • The coalescing of the tech park

    October 9, 2014
    The Little Rock Technology Park has slowly been evolving from a porridge of ideas in the minds of its Authority board to something in three dimensions. It has office space on Markham, currently leased by the Central Arkansas Challenge. It has a director, Brent Birch. Soon, Birch will be sending out a brochure outlining the goals of the park, the advantages of locating in downtown Little Rock, and images of what the park will look like when build-out is complete. /more/
  • Park drawing interest of local companies, director says; also, a clarification

    August 13, 2014
    Brent Birch, the newly hired director of the Little Rock Technology Park, told the board this afternoon that he'd had a "volume of interest" by local companies interested in the park. /more/
  • More »

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

  • The story of Jimmy Doyle's Country Club

    The last of the real honky tonks.
  • Blue Hog: Stacy Hurst undeserving of vote. Ditto.

    Blue Hog Report illustrates why Stacy Hurst isn't deserving of election to the state House of Representatives. And why her opponent's family got a deserved apology from the Little Rock school superintendent for a dirty trick done for her campaign.
  • Goose, remembered

    White Water Tavern owner a loveable rascal, friends say.
  • Susan Inman rips MIA Mark Martin

    Susan Inman, the Democratic candidate for secretary of state, opened her appearance on AETN's debate this morning by emphasizing incumbent Republican Mark Martin's absence from the debate and the new Blue Hog reporting on Facebook evidence that Martin spends dozens of work days at home in Prairie Grove, not at work in the Capitol.
  • Prepared for Ebola in Arkansas

    Health Department, hospitals scramble to prepare, though chance of the virus traveling to Arkansas is miniscule.

Most Viewed

  • Jason Rapert: The bully strikes again

    Sen. Jason Rapert talks a lot about integrity. He illustrates the reverse, by threatening payback to a Conway city employee for his support of Rapert's opponent.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Jason Rapert: The bully strikes again

    • I have worked with Wes Craiglow and want to reiterate that he is a fine…

    • on October 20, 2014
  • Re: Jason Rapert: The bully strikes again

    • Rapert will, undoubtedly, be the most confused man in Hell come Judgment Day

    • on October 19, 2014
  • Re: Jason Rapert: The bully strikes again

    • Senate District 35 map: http://www.arkansasredistricting.org/maps/PublishingImages/senate/35.jpg His property must be in that little part of Bigelow…

    • on October 19, 2014

Blogroll

 

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation