Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Saturday, July 21, 2012

The gun debate fires up again

Posted By on Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM

SUSPECTS WEAPONS: News accounts say the Colorado killer carried, along with handguns, this Smith and Wesson M&P 223 caliber semi-automatic rifle.
  • SUSPECT'S WEAPON: News accounts say the Colorado killer carried, along with handguns, this type of Smith and Wesson M&P .223 caliber semi-automatic rifle.

The slaughter in Aurora, Colo., naturally rekindles discussion of gun laws. And also, more on that here.

The basic arguments never change. The U.S. Supreme Court — even the pro-gun Republican court — allows regulation. Why shouldn't there be more? Background checks for all rifle purchases, for example. (I should have specified here originally that I meant uniformly applied, including in private sales, and with cooling-off periods as some states apply on handguns.) Limits on sale of tactical weapons, such as the semi-automatic military-style weapon used in Aurora and once subject to a federal ban that expired. Limits on expanded ammunition magazines.

The other side says that all regulation is pointless, if not a constitutional abridgement. The outlaws will ignore the law. What's more, the suspected shooter in Colorado had no criminal record. No background check would have stood in the way of his recent purchase of legal weapons and 6,000 rounds of ammo.

It's clear there's no appetite from either presidential candidate or significant numbers of leaders of either party in Congress to take further steps.

But I would be interested in hearing from gun lovers on the ready availability of semi-automatic military-style tactical weapons with 100-round ammo drums, reportedly in the possession of the Colorado killer. Are these sporting necessities? And if they are, is there any reason, other than temporary inconvenience, not to subject purchasers to reviews given handgun purchasers?

I will now duck and cover.

Tags: , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (50)

Showing 1-50 of 50

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-50 of 50

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

  • Bill to regulate dog breeders draws opposition inside chamber from industry rep

    A fight could be brewing over regulation of puppy mills, with legislation planned to better protect dogs and opposition already underway from a state representative who makes a living working with commercial dog breeders.
  • The hart

    It is hard for a straight person, The Observer included, to imagine what it would be like to be born gay — to be shipwrecked here on this space-going clod, where nearly every textbook, novel, film and television show, nearly every blaring screen or billboard or magazine ad, reinforces the idea that "normal" means "heterosexual."
  • Arkansas's new anti-gay law forgets history

    It turns back the clock on civil rights.
  • Hot Springs woman sues; says she was fired for being transgender

    One of the biggest lies of the battle to institutionalize legal discrimination against LGBT people in Arkansas is that protections are unneeded.
  • Presbytery of Arkansas opposes bills aimed at gay discrimination

    The Presbytery of Arkansas, the governing body for Presbyterian churches in the northern two-thirds of Arkansas, met Saturday at Clarksville and adopted a resolution urging Gov. Asa Hutchinson to veto SB 202, which is aimed at preventing local government from passing anti-discrimination laws to protect gay people. The Presbytery also expressed its opposition to a pending House bill that, in the name of "conscience," would protect those who discriminate against gay people.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation