Sunday, July 22, 2012

Legislators' expense reports

Posted By on Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:48 AM

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported today (pay wall) on the post-legislative-expense-lawsuit situation at the Arkansas legislature. Reimbursements are down.

A few points to remember before cheering:

1) It's election season. The grabs will increase once legislators are safely re-elected to another term. Republican Rep. Nate Bell of Mena, for example, told the D-G he'll file all his expenses at the end of the year. Hmmm. Maybe rules ought to specify monthly filing, so as to prevent legislators from hiding election-related expense reimbursements until AFTER the election.

2) We've seen only the leading edge of what legislators hope are legitimate ways to charge off home and private expenses to taxpayers, along with a little egg money for spouses in the form of reimbursements for answering the telephone. There will be abuses. Legislators with professional office jobs will have an edge on others in claiming a portion of their pre-existing costs can be attributed to legislative service. Some will be greedier than others in trying to direct more money into the family till.

The good news is that the public can see the reimbursement claim forms and make their own judgments. Local opponents will have every opportunity to put those reimbursements and payments to family members under a microscope. No more blanket claims, filed in a batch before the year begins.

3) A couple of lawmakers won approval for reimbursement for travel to partisan political activities. Is that official business? The call of the leadership is, apparently, that it is. Fine. Let that be considered by the public and potential opponents, too. Same thing for attendance at national conferences and road trips organized by special interest lobbies. If legislators think these are legitimate business expenses, turn in the claims and let taxpayers foot the bill. Just be prepared to explain.

Tags: ,

Favorite

Speaking of Legislative Expenses, Arkansas Politics

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Arkansas Supreme Court denies rehearing in death penalty challenge, but delays mandate

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today refused to rehear the case denying Death Row inmates information about drugs used by the state in the lethal injection process.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • Welspun layoffs: Another example of corporate welfare folly

    Layoffs at the Welspun pipe plant in Little Rock are a reminder of the folly of corporate welfare and the inability of Arkansas to separate itself from global economic forces. See the Fayetteville shale. And keep a watchful eye on that Sun Paper pulp mill proposed near Arkadelphia.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • Hamburg bank manager gets 21 months for theft

    Melinda Gwin, 49, of Hamburg has been sentenced to 21 months in federal prison and ordered to repay $210,875 stolen from the First National Bank of Crossett. She was sentenced in El Dorado federal court, according to a Justice Department news release.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Tackling autism, child by child

    An Arkansas Children's Hospital doctor is testing a new drug that targets one of a host of ailments the highly individual disorder can cause.
  • 1957 all over again

    Last week, the State Board of Education voted to ignore federal courts and allow school district transfers that will encourage segregation.
  • Death penalty lives

    Barely clinging to its flagging life, the death penalty got a merciful reprieve last month from the unlikeliest quarter, the Arkansas Supreme Court.
  • Drinking culture

    Here we go again. At the rate these campus sexual abuse sagas are making news, it's reasonable to ask what college administrators can possibly be thinking about.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation