Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Friday, August 3, 2012

We SHALL move - group leaves Tech Park opposition group

Posted By on Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM

ROHN MUSE: Still not for sale, but departing coalition.
  • ROHN MUSE: Still not for sale, but departing coalition.

ROHN MUSE: Still not for sale, but departing coalition.
  • ROHN MUSE: Still not for sale, but departing coalition.
Something is clearly up here. What's not clear just yet is exactly what.

But Rohn Muse, an outspoken leader of the Forest Hills neighborhood group in opposition to condemnation of a swath of the neighborhood for the proposed Little Rock Technology Park, has announced that his group is disassociating itself from the We Shall Not Be Moved Coalition, a combine of several neighborhoods, Occupy Little Rock and Arkansas Community Organizations working to protect three residential neighborhoods from expropriation for the city-financed building project.

That opposition was successful in leading to City Board action that caused the independent Tech Park Authority governing board to at least delay an instant decision on a site location for a review of sites in addition to the three originally targeted. Tech Park founding father Dickson Flake had personally put the Forest Hills neighborhood — along the south side of I-630 across from UAMS — in the mix and that led to suspicion all along that it was the first among equals in the site selection process. Proposals for alternatives will be accepted all this month. Leslie Peacock wrote this week in the Times about the pros and cons of a number of other sites.

Muse has so far not returned our calls on reports from some members of the coalition that he'd entered into some unspecified negotiations relative to the Tech Park issue and coming elections for the City Board (three at-large seats covering the affected neighborhoods will be on the ballot).

But he did send a copy of the letter he's sent to others in the neighborhood. It says the neighborhood remains committed to neighborhood preservation, but wants to "alleviate any possible confusion or conflict and allow each separate organization an opportunity to act and speak according to its respective best interest."

August 3, 2012

Friends and Colleagues,

Firstly, The Forest Hills Neighborhood Association (FHNA), is taking this opportunity to thank each of you for all the hard work and time you have devoted to assisting us in our battle to save our homes and, secondly, to inform the remaining WE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED Coalition (WSNBM) membership of our decision to withdraw from participation in the WSNBM Coalition.

As we all know, time is of the essence at this crucial point in the lives of The Forest Hills Neighborhood, and, to address the needs of our residents most effectively, we believe it is best to withdraw and apply more of our time and focus on preparing for future encounters. Our intent, on taking this position of separation, is to alleviate any possible confusion or conflict and allow each separate organization an opportunity to act and speak according to its respective best interest.

We feel it is necessary to emphasize that the position of the FHNA to fight to save our homes and neighborhood remains as it began, unchanged, as we continue to support the message of neighborhood preservation. However, effective immediately, we respectfully request that the WSNBM Coalition no longer speak or act on behalf of the Forest Hills Neighborhood Association. The FHNA and its membership thereupon resume full responsibility for carrying forth our message and actions.

Again, we thank the WSNBM Coalition for continued support and respect for our decision. Please feel free to distribute this message as you see fit to anyone of interest, and we will do the same.

The Forest Hills Neighborhood Association wishes the very best for each independent organization of great people who undoubtedly will go on to accomplish remarkable things. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.

Signed,

FHNA EXECUTIVE BOARD:

Rohn Muse, M. A.
rohnmuse@aol.com

Bobbie Phillips

William Riles

Daniel Hopwood

Denise Johnson

Mae Gettis

Laura Tyler

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

  • Resistance to equality in Eureka Springs and Little Rock

    February 18, 2015
    Disheartening news on the equality front. A referendum is in the works to repeal Eureka Springs' ordinance protecting LGBT people and some Little Rock city directors have had discouraging things to say about an effort to pass such an ordinance in the capital city. /more/
  • Tech companies want space now; park can't oblige

    February 12, 2015
    The Little Rock Technology Park Authority board on Wednesday night heard from park Director Brent Birch that two large tech companies and several small ones are eager to move into space on Main Street that the park is negotiating to buy. However, the buiilding, the annex to the Exchange Building at the northeast corner of Fifth and Main, probably won't be ready for occupation until the last quarter of 2015, Birch said. /more/
  • Fort Smith government fever: Is it spreading?

    February 9, 2015
    A reader says there's rumbling in Little Rock about beginning a drive here similar to that underway in Fort Smith to change the form of city government. /more/
  • Will Little Rock Board fail again on street ordinance?

    January 26, 2015
    Arkansas Outside, a website devoted to outdoor sports, offers reporting on the Little Rock City Board's recent failure to adopt a "complete streets" ordinance. Progressive planning policy has rarely been a hallmark of Little Rock city leaders. /more/
  • Kenneth Richardson under fire; let his actions decide

    January 21, 2015
    The Little Rock City Board last night heard from Ward 2 residents in favor and opposed to the resignation of City Director Kenneth Richardson because of a recent drunk driving arrest. I'd say such a call is at best premature. Also politically motivated. /more/
  • Venture Center new Tech Park tenant

    December 18, 2014
    The Arkansas Venture Center will be the Little Rock Technology Park's tenant in its temporary space in the Block 2 Building on Markham, where it will offer its pre-accelerator and incubation programs for early-stage businesses and its coding classes. Brent Birch, director of the park, said the arrangement will sustain the current momentum of interest in tech startups while the Tech Park works toward a permanent home and "show the tech park is happening." /more/
  • Downtown design district draws detractors

    December 3, 2014
    That bomb you heard going off around noon at the Lafayette Building at Louisiana and Sixth Street was dropped by the Little Rock Downtown Partnership, in the form of a proposed design overlay district for Main Street and its neighbors. /more/
  • More »

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

  • Bill to regulate dog breeders draws opposition inside chamber from industry rep

    A fight could be brewing over regulation of puppy mills, with legislation planned to better protect dogs and opposition already underway from a state representative who makes a living working with commercial dog breeders.
  • Clergy oppose another piece of gay discrimination legislation

    SB 202, which will take effect Tuesday unless Gov. Asa Hutchinson vetoes it, isn't the only legislation pending that aims at protecting discrimination against gay people. A companion bill, HB 1228, by Rep. Bob Ballinger, has similar intent to protect "conscience" as a pretext for legal discrimination against gay people in matters unrelated to religious practice.
  • The hart

    It is hard for a straight person, The Observer included, to imagine what it would be like to be born gay — to be shipwrecked here on this space-going clod, where nearly every textbook, novel, film and television show, nearly every blaring screen or billboard or magazine ad, reinforces the idea that "normal" means "heterosexual."
  • Arkansas's new anti-gay law forgets history

    It turns back the clock on civil rights.
  • Presbytery of Arkansas opposes bills aimed at gay discrimination

    The Presbytery of Arkansas, the governing body for Presbyterian churches in the northern two-thirds of Arkansas, met Saturday at Clarksville and adopted a resolution urging Gov. Asa Hutchinson to veto SB 202, which is aimed at preventing local government from passing anti-discrimination laws to protect gay people. The Presbytery also expressed its opposition to a pending House bill that, in the name of "conscience," would protect those who discriminate against gay people.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation