Tuesday, September 11, 2012

AEDC switches on solar panels; what say Lt. Gov. Darr? UPDATE

Posted By on Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM

TURNED ON: Solar panels at AEDC.

In Lt. Gov. Mark Darr's tirade over efforts to protect the environment (his SUV isn't hurting any polar bears, he whined) — an official letter from his office that you and I got to pay for with our tax dollars — he mentioned a "$500,000 solar panel" that had "never been turned on."

Darr can relax. At 8 a.m. today, the Arkansas Economic Development Commission flipped the switch on a bank of 22 (or 23 AEDC's energy office head Scott Hamilton says) solar panels installed at its offices on Capitol Avenue, a spokesman for Entergy said. (No one’s home at AEDC; we couldn’t find anyone there to confirm that. Maybe later.)

The delay in getting the solar panels up and running — they were installed in 2009 with stimulus dollars — was caused by potential legal problems in a net metering agreement drafted by Entergy and AEDC.

Originally, Hamilton said, the net metering agreement had an indemnification clause would have made the state liable for damages the panels might cause Entergy's grid. But Entergy and AEDC were watching to see how the court would rule in on a similar contract between Arkansas Tech University and Entergy. The state Court of Appeals ruled that state agencies can't indemnify against damage, and the state Supreme Court let that ruling stand. Because of that result, AEDC and Entergy drafted a new net metering agreement, which was approved by the Public Service Commission and signed by Entergy yesterday. (Now, Entergy’s remedy is at the state Claims Commission rather than AEDC.)

The panels will only provide up to 7 percent of the four-story building's energy needs, Hamilton said. But that's not the point. It's a green technology that’s better for the environment and it shows interested developers that the state backs renewable energy, "Someone has to step out front" when technology is new to promote it, Hamilton said.

UPDATE: AEDC confirms the panels, numbering 23, have been switched on.

Tags: , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (19)

Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • The arrival of autumn open line

    Here's the open line. Harvest Fest still happening in Hillcrest. Hog Roast tomorrow in North Little Rock in perfect weather.
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • Nasty women rise up against The Deplorable Donald

    It had to happen. Donald Trump's debate interjection that Hillary Clinton was a "nasty woman" has become a battle cry among women; a Twitter meme; a Facebook favorite, and, naturally, a marketing opportunity for T-shirt, button and bumper sticker makers.
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • Formal opposition emerges to Issue 3, the corporate welfare amendment

    It became apparent this morning that at least some money would be spent in opposition to Issue 3, a massive corporate welfare proposal to allow the state to pledge unlimited tax money to private projects and to allow local governments to also give money to private business and chamber of commerce lobbyists, a practice that has been ruled unconstitutional currently.
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Foster family disputes key statements from Justin Harris

    Craig and Cheryl Hart were the foster parents of the two sisters who were adopted by Rep. Justin Harris and his wife Marsha and later "rehomed." The Harts say that the adoption was allowed to proceed over the objections of the foster parents and local DHS staff due to pressure exerted by Cecile Blucker, head of the Division of Children and Family Services, on behalf of Justin Harris.
    • Mar 7, 2015
  • Rep. Nate Bell blasts adoption story before seeing it; 'rehoming' bill introduced

    Response to our story about rehoming and adoption has been overwhelmingly positive, with one exception. Rep. Nate Bell (R-Mena) has informed me that writing this story makes me the predator and Justin Harris the victim. I'm hellbound, apparently.
    • Mar 4, 2015
  • UPDATE: Judge rethinking punishment for attorneys in insurance settlement case

    Judge P.K. Holmes is rethinking whether lawyers deserve punishment in a class action lawsuit against an insurance company abruptly pulled from his court after pending more than a year and then quickly settled in a state court.
    • Jun 24, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation