Thursday, September 20, 2012

Casino backer loses bid to reconsider petitions

Posted By on Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:09 AM

I am on phone and limited in links. But the state Supreme Court today turned down Texas casino promoter Michael Wasserman's bid for more time to gather signatures for his casino amendment. The court upheld the secretary of stste's finding that initial filings were "facially" inadequate. More later.

UPDATE: Here's the majority opinion (two justices dissented concurred in a separate opinion but said they disagreed that Wasserman's corporation had standing to petition the court).

The Supreme Court upheld the secretary of state's finding that the petition drive failed because it was required to meet facial requirements in two ways — total signatures and signatures in each of 15 counties. Wasserman failed on the county signatures, the secretary of state said, and the Supreme Court said no evidence was presented to the contrary.

Tags: , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • TGIF

    Here's the Friday open line, plus a roundup of news and comment.
    • Feb 24, 2017
  • Fake news stings Tom Cotton

    Satirist Andy Borowitz invoked the name of U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton in a humor column poking fun at Republicans running from town hall meetings. Maybe a little unfair to Cotton, who DID hold such an event.
    • Feb 24, 2017
  • Price of a free press: Political retribution

    The Trump administration freezes some reporters out of press gatherings. Dejavu all over again for us at the Arkansas Times.
    • Feb 24, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

Little River County gears up for Sesquicentennial

Little River County gears up for Sesquicentennial

Historical entertainment planned for joint celebration of three Southwest Arkansas milestone anniversaries

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation