Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

The truth about Arkansas's tax burden

Posted By on Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:27 AM

BRING SALT: When Koch Arkansas figurehead Teresa Oelke starts talking tax burden on their political tours and free feeds, check Dumas for the facts.
  • BRING SALT: When Koch Arkansas figurehead Teresa Oelke starts talking tax burden on their political tours and free feeds, check Dumas for the facts.
The Kansas billionaires, the Koch brothers, are ceaselessly pumping the message through their Arkansas affiliate, Americans for Prosperity, that Arkansas is a high tax state, based on cooked numbers from a conservative interest group.

Ernie Dumas explains this week that the only meaningful measure of tax burden — gross taxes on a per capita basis — puts Arkansas about 30 spots down from the 14th claimed by the Kochheads.

But first, let's acknowledge a small truth in the AFP ads. State taxes and debt did rise significantly from 1999 through 2006. But the governor who pushed all those taxes and new debt was Mike Huckabee, a Republican. He raised more taxes — three sales tax increases, a temporary personal and corporate income tax increase, motor fuel taxes, tobacco taxes, liquor taxes, a giant tax on nursing home residents, and others — and increased the state debt more than any governor in Arkansas history. He coerced Democratic and Republican legislators and, at one point, the voters in going along with the taxes and borrowing.

The AFP ads, using figures from the business-oriented Tax Foundation, say Arkansas this year has the 14th highest per-capita tax burden in the country and a worse-than-average business tax climate.

The Tax Foundation doesn't rely on the actual taxes collected by each state; that's too simple. It constructs a theory about taxes and formulas to implement it so that states with income taxes tend to look worst.

If you add all the taxes actually collected by the state and local governments and divide the total by the population — you can do the numbers at home — Arkansas comes out not 14th but 47th among the states. All the surrounding states are higher. Now, the states distribute the tax burden in different ways, and Arkansas does it most unfairly, putting it most heavily on working folks with modest incomes with sales and excise taxes. But real numbers are the only way to measure each state's tax policy.

The Tax Foundation abuses poor states like Arkansas unmercifully. It says Arkansas levies a 3-percent surtax on corporation income, a brief tax that the Democratic Arkansas legislature repealed in 2005. It assigns to Arkansas taxpayers a share of the mineral severance taxes collected in other states like Alaska, Texas, Oklahoma and Wyoming. See, since Alaska's 22.5 percent production tax on oil and gas (thanks, Gov. Sarah Palin!) is paid by the producers and not by local people, the Tax Foundation assigns those taxes to people in other states, like Arkansas, that consume the petrochemical products. Florida levies a high sales tax but the Tax Foundation says tourists pay it so it doesn't count as much of a per-capita tax for Floridians.

You will note that states without income taxes show up as low-tax states in Tax Foundation rankings although the actual numbers show them as high-tax states.

You can believe the Kochs' hired hand, Teresa Oelke, and her pack of policy fiction, or maybe you want to look at the table compiled by state tax administrators, which has Arkansas at 47.

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Even ALEC gives Arkansas a good economic rating

    This is nice. The Koch Brothers' Americans for Prosperity has been peppering every social media outlet in addition to the mail and conventional media with the message that Arkansas really sucks and the only way to lift the state out of its economic morass is a Republican legislature.
    • Oct 15, 2012
  • The Republican purchase of Arkansas

    Lord how the out-of-state corporate money rolls in. If we had ethical disclosure laws worthy of the name, we'd at least be able to put a price tag on the cumulative sum being spent by Republican groups and their allies to buy control of the Arkansas legislature, the last Democratic majority in the deep South.
    • Oct 18, 2012
  • Dustin McDaniel's dilemma grows more complicated

    I've learned: * NEW CASES: There are apparently at least two other cases not disclosed previously in which the attorney general's office and Andi Davis, a Hot Springs lawyer with whom he's admitted an "inappropriate interaction," represented opposing parties.
    • Dec 24, 2012

People who saved…

Most Shared

  • Not giving up on Fred

    We ended up adopting Fred due to his incorrigible stubbornness. Originally bred to track game, basset hounds can be amazingly persistent. It sometimes appears that when their noses are working, their hearing shuts down.
  • Prosecutors have all the power

    But little oversight. Is a violation not a violation if a prosecutor says, 'I didn't mean to'?
  • Private clubs win early closing battle

    Private clubs apparently have won their battle against earlier closing hours, based on a "compromise" revealed at the City Board meeting last night.
  • The Kochs, Tom Cotton and their dislike of helping farmers

    The Koch political lobby is trying mightily to pretend it supports American farmers and that Tom Cotton's vote against the farm bill isn't a measure of farm support. A new report from a Democratic organization blows that dishonest messaging out of the water.
  • A tree grows in Little Rock

    When Darla talks about the tree, she calls it "he" sometimes, blurring the seam between the tree and the memory of her son.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation