Wednesday, October 17, 2012

About Benghazi

Posted By on Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:25 PM

The attack happened, Americans are dead, shifting statements about events in a chaotic land have been made.

Nonethless, in light of last night's debate and all, did anybody see this in the New York Times?

War, Libyan-style, remains very foggy, very complicated. Guess what? Maybe that movie DID have something to do with it.

Did the attack grow out of anger against an American-made video mocking the Prophet Muhammad, or was it waged by an affiliate of Al Qaeda out to mark the 11th anniversary of its attack on United States soil?

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier. And it is an explanation that tracks with their history as members of a local militant group determined to protect Libya from Western influence.
...United States intelligence agencies have reserved final judgment pending a full investigation, leaving open the possibility that anger at the video might have provided an opportunity for militants who already harbored anti-American feelings. But so far the intelligence assessments appear to square largely with local accounts. Whether the attackers are labeled “Al Qaeda cells” or “aligned with Al Qaeda,” as Republicans have suggested, depends on whether that label can be used as a generic term for a broad spectrum of Islamist militants, encompassing groups like Ansar al-Shariah whose goals were primarily local, as well as those who aspire to join a broader jihad against the West.

But in the heated election-year American political debate such distinctions have been lost, scholars said, as the administration has framed the attack around the need for American outreach to the Arab world, while Republicans have focused on the perils of American weakness there.

Back to the experts who've never set foot on Libyan soil to tell us what really happened. Only those with a narrative critical of President Obama are to be construed as reliable. (Why, really, do the Republicans hate America?)

Thanks, as ever, to Daily Howler, still ruminating on the highs and lows of presidential debate coverage.

FOR THE FACT-BASED WORLD: This Q&A might also be useful.

Tags: , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Fort Smith mosque vandalized

    Fort Smith's Al Salam mosque was vandalized Thursday morning.
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • The open line and headlines

    Here's the Thursday open line and mid-afternoon news roundup.
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • Kochs spread money around Arkansas

    The Koch Industries PAC spread a lot of money around in September, including significant sums in state legislative races around the country. All politics is local when you have a big polluting industry to look after.
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • War. What is it good for? Tom Cotton has an idea

    Twenty-four hours after meddling in President Obama's talks with Iran, hawkish Sen. Tom Cotton scheduled an off-the-record meeting with defense contractors, who'd be happy to supply goods for U.S. armed incursions in the Middle East.
    • Mar 9, 2015
  • On the cover: A legislator's adoption and 'rehoming'

    This week's cover story is an important one by Benjamin Hardy about an adoption practice of "rehoming" that has become controversial nationwide and the harm that befell a child who'd been placed in another's care after being adopted by a state legislator.
    • Mar 3, 2015
  • Justin and Marsha Harris: We have "suffered a severe injustice"

    Rep. Justin Harris and his wife, Marsha, have issued a statement through their lawyer in advance of tomorrow afternoon's press conference, at which Harris is expected to offer comment on the rehoming of their adopted daughters at a home where they were subsequently sexually abused.
    • Mar 5, 2015

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The open line and headlines

    • Best wishes on your surgery, Vanessa! You'll be up and happy dancing in no time!

    • on October 20, 2016
  • Re: The open line and headlines

    • What Perplexed said, Vanessa. I will lift my face to the light fixture and think…

    • on October 20, 2016
  • Re: Fort Smith mosque vandalized

    • Think of the outrage if this had been done to one of our many Cinderblock…

    • on October 20, 2016



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation