Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Vote NO on Issue 2, another corporate welfare scheme

Posted By on Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM

A Talk Business/Hendrix poll today shows voters mostly in the dark on a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment that is a Trojan horse for yet another giveaway to real estate developers.

A NO vote is the proper option, as we've said before.

The poll says that 35 percent favor it, 35 percent oppose it and the rest are undecided. Not surprising. There's been no talk about it and no organized advertising so far. If any emerges, it will be a last-minute dishonest blitz from real estate developers anxious for approval of a deal by which compliant city and county officials (see Little Rock, whose board is controlled by the business community) would authorize a sales tax on hamburgers, groceries and everything else to subsidize commercial development, typically the likes of big sporting good stores and entertainment districts.

I bet some developers are waiting in the wings to seek this subsidy in Little Rock and that the chamber of ocmmerce-controlled board — which thinks free enterprise means free financing on the taxpayer tab — has lots of good ideas about taxing local people to benefit private interests. Sure they'll create some new waitressing and clerk jobs. But they'll also kill some at competitors elsewhere who don't enjoy such subsidies.

The amendment also makes it easier for local governments to borrow money and would allow taxes to shore up police and fire pension funds. Police and firefighters are the figleaf for another naked grab at corporate welfare, stymied by court rulings in the case of the Tax Increment Finance boondoggle, another real estate developer enrichment scheme.

Hold your breath: Looks like Teresa Oelke and the other running dogs at the Koch boys' Arkansas lobby and I are in agreement on this one. Haven't seen them doing any mailing on this one, however.

Oh, Jesus, I've just learned Debbie Pelley is against Issue 2 as well because it will supposedly fund UN projects. If Jerry Cox joins in, I may have to rethink.

Tags: , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Arkansas unemployment rate rises in September

    The Arkansas unemployment rate in September moved up to 4 percent from 3.9 percent the month before, with an overall drop in workforce.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • The push for medical marijuana begins

    Advertising has begun for Issue 6, the constitutional amendment to allow sale of medically prescribed marijuana through for-profit dispensaries regulated by the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Division.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • Bart Hester and the myth of self-sustaining public services

    The War Memorial Stadium budget debate is full of red herrings from Sen. Bart Hester. Public services are rarely self-sustaining. We pay taxes to support things of public value.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Rep. Nate Bell blasts adoption story before seeing it; 'rehoming' bill introduced

    Response to our story about rehoming and adoption has been overwhelmingly positive, with one exception. Rep. Nate Bell (R-Mena) has informed me that writing this story makes me the predator and Justin Harris the victim. I'm hellbound, apparently.
    • Mar 4, 2015
  • Mary Steenburgen adds voice against gay discrimination law

    Mary Steenburgen, the Arkansas native actress, has added her voice to those opposing HB 1228, the bill aimed at preserving legal discrimination against gay people under the pretext of religious freedom. It would create untold other complications for all sorts of government activities to give people a religious excuse to avoid the law.
    • Mar 3, 2015
  • Lawyers plead for mercy in Fort Smith forum shopping case

    Twelve of the lawyers facing punishment by federal Judge P.K. Holmes in Fort Smith for moving a class action case against an insurance company out of his court to a state court where it was speedily settled have filed their argument against sanctions.
    • Jun 16, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation