Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Saturday, November 3, 2012

The core dishonesty on Issue 2 requires NO vote

Posted By on Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:08 AM

REDEVELOPMENT? Mall at Turtle Creek in Jonesboro, which benefited from an earlier stab at a redevelopment amendment, would have been built with or without taxpayer subsidy, officials said at the time. Issue 2 heads down that same road.
  • REDEVELOPMENT? Mall at Turtle Creek in Jonesboro, which benefited from an earlier stab at a redevelopment amendment, would have been built with or without taxpayer subsidy, officials said at the time. Issue 2 heads down that same road.

REDEVELOPMENT? Mall at Turtle Creek in Jonesboro, which benefited from an earlier stab at a redevelopment amendment, would have been built with or without taxpayer subsidy, officials said at the time. Issue 2 heads down that same road.
  • REDEVELOPMENT? Mall at Turtle Creek in Jonesboro, which benefited from an earlier stab at a redevelopment amendment, would have been built with or without taxpayer subsidy, officials said at the time. Issue 2 heads down that same road.
The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's Michael Wickline wrote a thorough analysis of little-discussed (pay wall) Issue 2, another get-rich scheme for developers that is mostly flying under radar this election season. As I've said before, the Koch Bros.' paid mouthpiece in Arkansas, Teresa Oelke, quoted in the article, is dead right on this issue.

The constitutional scheme before voters Tuesday to allow local sales taxes to subsidize private retail development is nothing but corporate welfare, with no proven benefit to anyone except the corporation receiving the handout. They call it economic development or, worse, "redevelopment." But no retail store ever created new demand for socks, underwear, shotguns or anything else. It only shifted the business from somewhere else. If private businesses want to invest some money in, say, a Southwest Little Rock shopping center to build a giant sporting goods store that would cripple other sporting goods stores in the rest of Little Rock, Benton, North Little Rock or wherever, let them do it with their own dimes.

Read the language carefully:

Issue 2 would allow “the acquisition, development, redevelopment, and revitalization of land within the district, for eliminating or preventing the development or spread of slums or blighted, deteriorated, or deteriorating areas, for discouraging the loss of commerce, industry, or employment, for increasing employment, or any combination ... as may be defined by the General Assembly.” My emphasis supplied

There's all kind of cloaking language about redevelopment and revitalization but it is not REQUIRED by the plain language. To qualify for the handout, a business need only demonstrate it has bought land to open a business that will employ someone, even if it means a loss of jobs and resulting blight elsewhere. A Little Rock developer could get a tax subsidy to build a Brooks Brothers store in ritzy Pulaski Heights.

We went down this road before with the tax increment finance amendment, another developer boondoggle upended when the Supreme Court wouldn't let developers plunder school tax money for shopping centers. Now they're back trying to cadge sales tax money.

Remember Amendment 78, the "city and county government redeveloment" amendment"? It provided:

For purposes of this section, the term "redevelopment project" means an undertaking for eliminating, or preventing the development or spread of, slums or blighted, deteriorated, or deteriorating areas, for discouraging the loss of commerce, industry, or employment, or for increasing employment, or any combination thereof, as may be defined by the General

Again, I supplied emphasis in the passage above. All that claptrap about redevelopment was just a cloak for the real purpose, subsidies for developers in the richest cities. Create a job and you qualify, even if you kill jobs elsewhere with your project. One of the few projects shoved through under this handout before it (the TIF handout scheme) foundered was the Turtle Creek Mall in Jonesboro, in a better part of town, that further damaged competitively an older shopping center. Some redevelopment. Go-go Rogers and Little Rock and North Little Rock developers also were licking their chops and you can be sure they weren't targeting the ghetto.

It's another bite at the same apple. Vote NO ON ISSUE 2. The Kochs and the Arkansas Times, together at last.

Tags: , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Consequences for violating the Freedom of Information Act

    I was happy to read in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette today that Prosecuting Attorney Larry Jegley intends to file a charge of violation of the Freedom of Information Act against Rodney Forte, director of the Metroopolitan Housing Agency of Little Rock. Prosecution might be the only cure for arrogant and stupid public officials, who aren't limited to the housing agency.
    • Oct 30, 2014
  • The Democratic push for black voter turnout unsettles white Republicans

    Democratic groups are using racially charged images to turn out the black votes, nationally and in Arkansas, and Republicans aren't happy about it. Truth hurts.
    • Oct 30, 2014
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Koch mailer: We know who you are, we know if you vote

    Still more complaints rolling in — including from Republicans — about the mail campaign of the Koch-brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity to scare people into voting.
  • Pat Hays' NRA membership riles Republicans

    Democratic 2nd District Congress candidate Pat Hays is causing conniption fits among Republicans because a new TV ad shows him with his guns and mentions his long-time membership in the National Rifle Association.
  • Talk is cheap; state government isn't: Preparing for the new GOP order

    The state looks at rising prison and school costs in a world where the theme of Republican political campaigns is reducing government and cutting taxes. Does anybody in that party know arithmetic?
  • Live Review: Nahko and Medicine for the People at Rev Room

    Thursday night, Portland, Oregon’s Nahko and Medicine for the People brought their “musical medicine” to Little Rock’s Revolution Music Room, a fitting venue for the socially-conscious music collective. Their uplifting medley of folk, urban and world music, as well as hypnotizing videos featuring their music have enchanted activist-minded music fans across the world in the relatively short time they have been creating music together.
  • What about the Arkansas ballot issues?

    To give the legislature more power, the people less, a wetter state, longer term limits and a bump in the minimum wage.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation