Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Is it legal to use state money to pay gym fees for prosecutors or cops?

Posted by on Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM

Attorney general's opinion issued today has this summary of a question from the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee:

QUESTIONS: 1) Does the public purpose doctrine cited in Ark. Const. art. 2, sec. 8, or any other law, prohibit expending public funds on athletic facility membership dues and fees for a prosecuting attorney and his or her deputy prosecuting attorneys? 2) Does the public purpose doctrine cited in Ark.
Const. art. 2, sec. 8, or any other law, prohibit expending public funds on athletic facility membership dues and fees for other agencies' law enforcement personnel?

RESPONSES:

* Q1) The applicable law does not appear to contemplate using public funds to purchase a private
gym membership in the name of a prosecutor or his deputies. ...

* Q2) This question cannot be answered categorically; instead, I believe the pertinent analysis in each instance will entail a factual consideration of the extent to which physical conditioning might be described as bearing directly on an officer's ability to perform his official duties. Only a finder of fact could determine whether in any given instance the expenditure of public funds to promote the physical fitness of law enforcement officers would be statutorily or
constitutionally permissible.

Subject to this proviso, in my opinion, when a particular law enforcement job requires that an officer meet a minimum standard of physical fitness, I believe a reviewing court might consider it constitutionally permissible to expend public funds to purchase a gym membership for that officer. More generally, if a department lacked the
physical facilities to conduct its own conditioning program, I believe a reviewing court might approve as constitutionally appropriate a public contract providing qualifying officers access to private athletic facilities. I have found no Arkansas authority directly addressing this issue.

Full opinion here.

Tags: , ,

Speaking of...

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Connecting the dots

    There's ample reason for ethics, judicial and perhaps even prosecutorial review of the curious creation of a group of political action committees solely funded by contributions from Fort Smith nursing home magnate Michael Morton.
    • Apr 10, 2014
  • The real story about the judicial system in Arkansas

    The big story isn't campaign finance funny business except to the extent that it reflects a much larger story about justice in Arkansas. Gilbert Baker and co. have worked for year in the employ of forces who want to make it harder to sue for damages in Arkansas courts: the so-called "tort reform" campaign of big business.
    • Apr 4, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

April

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30  

Blogroll

Slideshows

  • As part of Ball State University's BSU at the Games, Arkansas Times photo intern Matt Amaro covered the culture of Sochi during the Winter Olympics.
 

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation