Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Nate Bell's 'reforms' have serious costs

Posted By on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM

Rep. Nate Bell image
  • Rep. Nate Bell

Rep. Nate Bell image
  • Rep. Nate Bell
Rep. Nate Bell, a Tea Party Republican from Mena, has long been a puppet for the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the Koch brothers-funded corporate lobby that fronts as a state legislative educational organization while pushing out anti-tax, anti-regulation measures. Today, in fact, he's been quoting ALEC's director of health and human services tax force, Christie Herrera on Facebook (really insightful stuff, by the way).

Earlier this week, Bell told the Arkansas Project that one of his legislative priorities is to allow legislators to opt out of membership of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). The national coalition is an educational, bi-partisan organization that provides legislators continuing education and networking opportunities. In theory, when state legislators from around the country convene they might pick up some good ideas from colleagues from other states.

Here's how the Arkansas Project frames Bell's issue with NCSL and his proposed measure:

Right now, state legislators are automatically entered into a left-leaning legislative coalition, the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), at the cost of the taxpayer. Legislators are given no choice as to whether or not they want to join the group. Bell’s reform would give legislators a $500 allowance to join a coalition of their choice, saving the taxpayers money in cases where some legislators choose not to partake or to join a cheaper coalition and giving legislators, well, freedom.

The cost, Bell mentions, is $151,850, about $1,100 per legislator, all together equal to a rounding error as a portion of the state budget. Bell doesn't explicitly say this, but it's clear: He plans to save taxpayers money by only participating in ALEC, which is free because of corporate subsidies. But as a new study by Good Jobs First and the Iowa Policy Project details, ALEC's policies have significant costs.

"We tested ALEC's claims against actual economic results," said Dr. Peter Fisher, primary author of the study. "We conclude that eliminating progressive taxes, suppressing wages, and cutting public services are actually a recipe for economic inequality, declining incomes, and undermining public infrastructure and education that really matter for long-term economic growth."

The study dissects the methodology used by ALEC's lead author Arthur Laffer and his co-authors. It finds that their arguments and evidence range from deeply flawed to nonexistent, consistently ignoring decades of peer-reviewed academic research. Instead, Laffer et al repeatedly engage in methodologically primitive approaches such as two-factor correlations and comparing arbitrary small numbers of states instead of all 50.

Regardless of what you think of the value of NCSL or ALEC for that matter, this is typical Republican budget slashing: find something that's meaningless in the grand scheme of things and try to sell it as curbing government waste.

Tags: , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Lindsey Millar

  • The Thanksgiving Eve Edition

    Corporate welfare to a Chinese company, a legal case involving same-sex couples and their children’s birth certificates, state Auditor Andrea Lea’s bid to take possession of unclaimed matured U.S. savings bonds, the legacy of President Clinton and Thanksgiving tradition — all covered on this week's edition of the podcast.
    • Nov 25, 2015
  • While you're trying to tune out your family this Thanksgiving, think of a Big Idea

    Our annual Big Ideas for Arkansas is just a few weeks away, and we really want to hear from you. To get your wheels spinning, we've collected all the Big Ideas we've featured since 2010.
    • Nov 24, 2015
  • More »

Most Shared

  • How do you say thanks in Chinese?

    Some seasonal cheer.
  • Utility seeks hike for little guy

    You may remember that Act 725, obviously designed by Entergy, slid through the legislature last spring with virtually no stir or debate.
  • Task force appears set to move forward with tweaked private option; battle looms over managed care

    The Health Reform Task Force had its penultimate meeting today; by law, it must issue a report with recommendations by the end of this year. All indications are that the task force will recommend continuing the private option with a few GOP-friendly tweaks. The governor will be negotiating with the federal government on just what shape the private option (perhaps with a snappy new name) will take in 2017 and beyond, once the state's current agreement with the feds comes to an end. The once hotly controversial issue has been fairly muted in task force discussions. The fireworks, instead, have come with how to handle the rest of the Medicaid program, with the state's consultant, the Stephen Group, suggesting that the state could save hundreds of millions of dollars by moving to managed care.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation