Saturday, December 15, 2012
Law Filing challenges retirement law on judges
Posted by Max Brantley on Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:08 AM
She wants to overturn the state law that makesArkansas judges give up retirement benefits if they don't retire at 70. I think she has a good point on the dubious constitutionality of a law effectively discriminating on basis of age. (And, I should add, it has no personal bearing on me. My wife, a judge who turned 64 in September, is retiring Dec. 31 after 26 years on the bench for reasons having nothing to do with that aspect of law.)
Daugherty is seeking a ruling through a request for declaratory judgment in a wholly unrelated case involving a protective order issued in a case concerning her stepdaughter. I have a hard time seeing this as an appropriate venue to raise the issue, but I'm no lawyer and real ones have been beaten by Daugherty before. So I'll just leave this with you as an FYI. She explains:
Personally, I believe this to be unconstitutional.I do not want to remove all of the experienced justices in favor of a few younger one's, as I do not want to be a victim or a part of someone's judicial scientific experiment.
It would appear improper for a judge to challenge the statute in question (A.C.A. 24-8-215).
It also appears that no attorney in the State of Arkansas has the balls nor is willing to step forward to address this issue within the legal system. This regulation of judges does not belong in the legislature's hands as the judicial system is constitutionally required to stay separate and untouched by the politics of politicians.
Daughtery's action will be mooted if the state's judges win approval of their legislative package this year, which includes repeal of the retirement statute. The legislature hasn't been too warm toward judicial proposals in recent years, however.
Comments (5)
Showing 1-5 of 5
More by Max Brantley
-
Ethics "reform" — Arkansas Republican style
Max erupting from a volcanic atoll on the South Island of New Zealand:] E-mail arrives from Sen. David Sanders, touting a couple of pieces of so-called ethics legislation.
- Mar 3, 2013
-
More oil spill questions UPDATE
Questions continue to mount on the Exxon Mobil pipeline rupture that drenched a Mayflower neighborhood with Canadian tar sands and forced evacuation of homes.
- Apr 5, 2013
- More »
Event Calendar
-
Re: UA prof writes on the 'junk science' of 20-week abortion bans
Francis J. "Frank" Beckwith is an American philosopher, Christian apologist, scholar, debater, and lecturer who…
- on May 24, 2013
-
Re: Medicaid payment reform may be reducing costs but legislature delays further implementation
Dammit, I hate it when I agree with the likes of David Meeks on anything…
- on May 24, 2013
-
Re: TGIF
Ark has nothing the list but note All of the State of Texas did make…
- on May 24, 2013
Top Commenters
Blogroll
Slideshows
-
May 16, 2013
Site Index
News
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
Entertainment
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings
This Week's Cover
Quick Links
Special Publications
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
