Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Friday, December 28, 2012

A Republican argues for contraceptive funding

Posted By on Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:59 AM

A "pro-life" Republican strategist has written an op-ed for that newspaper Tim Griffin reviles criticizing Republicans for blocking federal funding for family planning (birth control pill distribution is a key component). She writes:

Maintaining a federal role in contraceptive care for low-income women is a far more moral, empathetic and fiscally responsible approach to the problem of unwanted pregnancies than simply condemning abortion — notwithstanding conservative principles of personal responsibility and limited government. If every woman who wanted reliable contraceptive care got it, irrespective of income, we should expect that abortion services would substantially decrease. This would not only reduce government spending on Medicaid — a dollar spent on contraceptive care is associated with a $2 to $6 reduction in health care costs — but, more important, avert the tragedy and anguish involved in abortion. And it would empower women to decide for themselves when they want to have children, advance their education or pursue career opportunities.

Couple of problems:

1) The author, Juleanna Glover, says Republicans oppose the Title X spending because so much goes to Planned Parenthood (though NOT for any abortion-related services). Her solution is to punish Planned Parenthood for offering a legal medical service by refusing Title X money to any organization that provides abortion. It's not clear who'd step into the significant void if Planned Parenthood's free speech and association was so abridged and it was forced out of family planning funding if it chose to continue to provide a full range of women's health services.

2) For many Republicans, Planned Parenthood is a useful foil. These Republicans oppose "free birth control pills," too — rabidly. See the current fight on providing a full range of preventive care to women, including pills, as the Obama admininistration has required.

Tags: , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Not giving up on Fred

    We ended up adopting Fred due to his incorrigible stubbornness. Originally bred to track game, basset hounds can be amazingly persistent. It sometimes appears that when their noses are working, their hearing shuts down.
  • Private clubs win early closing battle

    Private clubs apparently have won their battle against earlier closing hours, based on a "compromise" revealed at the City Board meeting last night.
  • Prosecutors have all the power

    But little oversight. Is a violation not a violation if a prosecutor says, 'I didn't mean to'?
  • The Kochs, Tom Cotton and their dislike of helping farmers

    The Koch political lobby is trying mightily to pretend it supports American farmers and that Tom Cotton's vote against the farm bill isn't a measure of farm support. A new report from a Democratic organization blows that dishonest messaging out of the water.
  • In Hot Springs, pizza means Deluca's

    In Hot Springs, one pizzeria is taking fresh flavors to the next level.

Most Viewed

  • Liquor stores contribute $1.2 million to fight alcohol sales

    If you didn't understand the specifics, you might find irony in the fact that Arkansas liquor stores have contributed $1.2 million — so far — to an effort to defeat a proposed constitutional amendment to allow retail alcohol sales in all 75 counties.

Most Recent Comments



© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation