Kids should not be bound to attend a school b/c of arbitrary, imaginary lines that create a "district"
This is the one-school-district theory of education. It is defensible in the Arkansas Constitution, which makes the state ultimately responsible for a sufficient and equal education for all students in Arkansas. It IS the logical conclusion of a system in which a parent can claim an educational advantage to moving a white kid from El Dorado to Parkers Chapel or Norphlet and both the losing and gaining district have little constructive means — except arbitrariness — to stop it.
Even many of the school administrators fighting such a sweeping change in the law in the interest of preserving local district autonomy know that Arkansas still has way too many school districts. We shouldn't have many more than one per county — perhaps a few additional in areas with big populations.
But the billionaires Johnny Key is speaking for ultimately favor total portability of public money. They want a parent to be able to take it wherever they wish, preferably to a school unburdened by state regulation and without a union workforce, even a private church school.
Appealing as this might sound to some, it would have profound consequences and hasten the demise of many small school districts that patrons love for their insular community feel, regardless of course offerings, achievement or management. It would also be the death knell of uniform and equal education for all.
I touched on this huge subject in a column this week.
Thoughts and prayers for this family...
If'n I was of them there Muslims I would most definitely make my first stand…
For those who want citations. The federal Civil Rights Act - see 42 USC Sec…