Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

If Arkansas goes for "private option," why would Medicaid need more means testing?

Posted By on Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:09 PM

Bruce Westerman image
  • Rep. Bruce Westerman

Bruce Westerman image
  • Rep. Bruce Westerman

When Republican lawmakers are out trumpeting the new alternative to Medicaid expansion, they're always quick to note that they want changes to the existing Medicaid program too. One big one is more means testing — extra steps to verify the income levels of recipients to make sure they qualify.

In his interview with Roby Brock last weekend, Rep. John Burris pushed for "reforms to our current system," specifically arguing that "absolutely we could do a better job of means testing and verifying that people receiving benefits are eligible for the benefits they're receiving."

The issue for Republicans is that right now, if you're a parent in Arkansas, you're not eligible for Medicaid if you make less than 17 percent of the federal poverty level. For a family of two, if you make more than $2600, you get kicked off the roles. For a family of four, the line is $4,000. These eligibility rates for the Medicaid program would stay the same if the state expands via the exchange.

A source of great stress and consternation for Republicans is: What if, say, a single mother with three kids making $5,000 a year sneaks on to the Medicaid rolls? They really, really don't want this to ever happen, which is why they advocate for more means testing for Medicaid.

Snark aside, I have a simple question. If Arkansas says yes to the new coverage plan, the plan Burris pitches in that interview with Brock, why would low-income folks try to sneak on to the Medicaid rolls when they could get free private insurance? Remember, Burris argues that these plans are going to be significantly better for recipients. Both he and Sen. Jonathan Dismang believe that folks would much rather be on a private plan. Maybe I'm missing a nuance here. But even if you think more aggressive means testing is a good idea, it's rendered completely irrelevant by the "private option" approach. If Republicans are right that the private plans will be better, the issue wouldn't be folks sneaking into Medicaid. The game-the-system scenario would be very poor parents saying they were above 17 percent FPL when they were actually below, the Welfare Queen fantasy in reverse.

I asked Rep. Bruce Westerman, a leader of his party's Waste Wing, ever vigilant against Waste! Fraud! Abuse! If there are free-premium private plans, why in the world would someone present themselves as poorer than they are to get on Medicaid? Why would we need more means testing for the Medicaid program?

"That seems to make sense, that logic," Westerman said.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Arkies' doc on Richards to get a sneak peek in NYC

    "Backwards and in High Heels," the new bio-doc about former Texas Gov. Ann Richards, will get a pre-release sneak peek at the Athena Film Festival in New York City on Feb. 10.
    • Jan 16, 2012
  • Highway 61 Blues Festival moves date closer to King Biscuit

    The Highway 61 Blues Festival in Leland, Miss., usually held in early June, will be moved this year to Sept. 29.
    • Mar 8, 2012
  • VA gets building permit

    The city has issued the VA a building permit for its rehabilitation of the former Cook Jeep dealership at 10th and Main for a drop-in clinic to replace smaller quarters at 2nd and Ringo.
    • Apr 3, 2012

People who saved…

Most Shared

  • The fall of Boehner

    Nothing so became U.S. Rep. John Boehner's tenure as speaker of the House as his manner of leaving it. Subjectively speaking, he has never appeared to believe very much of the nonsense his position required him to utter. An old school politician who literally grew up working in the family bar, his conservatism is of the traditional Midwestern kind — more Bob Dole, say, than Ted Cruz.
  • Warrior

    As a young man, Ted Holder helped Arkansas take some of its first steps toward LGBT equality.
  • Huckawho? Ex-gov is yesterday's flavor

    Given the wild gyrations of the Republican presidential nominating race, I write these words knowing that a future meal of them remains possible, but nonetheless: Mike Huckabee is toast.
  • First Nixon, then Boehner

    Like Richard Nixon's resignation speech 41 years earlier, John Boehner's sudden valedictory from Congress may be said to be the old politician's finest moment.
  • Razorbackula and a tour through the police blotter

    A certain morbid curiosity about crime is one of the few silver linings of living in a place where the per capita crime rate rivals even the shystiest hellhole corners of the country. So that’s our topic for the week, crime reporting.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Game time open line

    • I agree eLwood. A great season opener with the Huckabee and Santorum commercial and the…

    • on October 3, 2015
  • Re: Game time open line

    • SNL really fried Santorum and Huckabee tonight. Gave Trump a good working over too. The…

    • on October 3, 2015
  • Re: Game time open line

    • I plan to support the Democratic nominee.

      who do you support radical ?

    • on October 3, 2015



© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation