HISTORIC FENCE: The low-profile fence at the Villa Marre was among those offered as examples in a review of whether a fence height limit should be raised in the neighborhood.

  • HISTORIC FENCE: The low-profile fence at the Villa Marre was among those offered as examples in a review of whether a fence height limit should be raised in the neighborhood.

Ah, the great fence debate. Remember it?

Advertisement

Gabe Holmstrom, chief of staff for the Arkansas House of Representatives, wanted to build a fence around his Quapaw Quarter house. He found out — as a restorer of another graceful downtown renovation project had found earlier — that rules for the Capitol Zoning District limit frontyard fences to 40 inches. He wanted eight inches more, enough to keep his dog from escaping. But rather than seek a waiver (no certainty based on the other restorer’s experience), he influenced legislative hardball.

First, the budget of the Capitol Zoning District Commission, a state agency, got held up. Then Rep. Nate Bell offered legislation to abolish the commission entirely.

Advertisement

Ultimately, something of a compromise was reached. CZDC got its budget. The abolition bill died. The Commission held a hearing on changing the fence rule — to 48 inches for front yards and from six to eight feet for backyard fences. Arguments were heard, among them that, despite the 40-inch rule, all manner of larger unsightly fences existed in the district. But preservationists urged retention of the rule, which they said was in keeping with historic appearances. Various committees split on the issues.

Here’s an exhaustive summary of the debate prepared for the Commission.

Advertisement

Yesterday, a climactic chapter in the story:

The Capitol Zoning District Commission voted 9 to 0 NOT to change the fence rule.

Quite a unified voice. You have to wonder if buried in it might be just a little bit of blowback at the political meddling that had occurred. Or maybe they merely were persuaded by the staff’s recommendation in favor of status quo.

The question now is whether that vote IS the final chapter. There’s another legislative session in January and state agency budgets will again be up for approval.

Advertisement

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article Iris DeMent to Oxford American’s South on Main Next article UPDATE: Secretary of State Mark Martin piles up attorney fees