Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Where are the pro-life liberals?

Posted By on Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:07 AM

THEY MESSED WITH THEM: Protests didnt stop Texas anti-abortion legislation or address concerns about health care for women in general.
  • THEY MESSED WITH THEM: Protests didn't stop Texas anti-abortion legislation or address concerns about health care for women in general.
Ross Douthat, the conservative columnist for the New York Times, writes today that Texas' effort to severely limit abortion availability — Arkansas, too, currently has a 20-week limit thanks to the 2013 legislature — could provide a case study of the effects of severe restrictions.

Will it hamper female mortality, health and economic advancement on a par with some of the most anti-abortion countries around the world? Or will outcomes be more like those in France, Germany, Italy and Ireland, where restrictions of varying degrees are in place (including a virtual ban in Ireland)?

Don't know. And it's a question that goes well beyond my first core disagreement, which is on the question of whether women should have the power to make this decision wherever they live.

But I credit Douthat for this observation in the course of noting that anti-abortion Ireland shows positive results for women in many respects:

Now it’s also true that Ireland, like most of Europe, is to the left of Texas on many economic issues. All the abortion restrictions described above coexist with universal health care, which Rick Perry’s state conspicuously lacks.

So perhaps, it might be argued, abortion can be safely limited only when the government does more to cover women’s costs in other ways — in which case Texas might still be flirting with disaster.

But note that this is a better argument for liberalism than for abortion.

It suggests, for instance, that liberal donors and activists should be spending more time rallying against Perry’s refusal to take federal Medicaid financing than around Wendy Davis’s famous filibuster.

It implies that the quest to “turn Texas blue” should make economic policy rather than late-term abortion its defining issue.

And it raises the possibility that a pro-life liberalism — that once-commonplace, now-mythical persuasion — would actually have a stronger argument to make than the one Texas’s critics are making now.

Texas is famously stingy when it comes to providing support for health care. Arkansas miraculously held its hand out for Obamacare's proffered financial riches, so there's that to suggest we are somewhat different. But I don't see much support within Arkansas's most outspoken anti-abortion lobby for government-supported universal health care or other support for families, particularly including such important preventive measures as birth control pills and other family planning services. Correct me if I'm wrong.

PS — If you'd like to delve a little to deeper in how Texas provides for its women in addition to restricting their abortion rights, this Planned Parenthood release can help.

Tags: , , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (25)

Showing 1-25 of 25

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-25 of 25

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas No. 5 in education ranking; but below curve in achievement

    Bound by one of those stupid embargoes some national groups still persist in using that favor dead-tree publications, I couldn't release until this morning Education Week's annual ranking that again puts Arkansas No. 5 among the stats on a group of education measures.
    • Jan 10, 2013
  • Woo, Pig, Bruce Westerman for Congress

    Republican state Rep. Bruce Westerman's announcement as a candidate for 4th District Congress is later today, but he's already rolled out the Westerman biopic on YouTube, complete with plenty of shots of his days as a walk-on football player at the University of Arkansas (Cotton Bowl victories during the Westerman era) and plenty of other touchstones from God (good) to IRS (bad).
    • Aug 13, 2013
  • Stop the War on Women: March 23

    Organizers of "Protest at the State Capital" are calling on women who are appalled at the treatment the Arkansas legislature has handed them this session to rally at the state Capitol at 3 p.m.
    • Mar 14, 2013

People who saved…

Most Shared

  • Bill to regulate dog breeders draws opposition inside chamber from industry rep

    A fight could be brewing over regulation of puppy mills, with legislation planned to better protect dogs and opposition already underway from a state representative who makes a living working with commercial dog breeders.
  • The hart

    It is hard for a straight person, The Observer included, to imagine what it would be like to be born gay — to be shipwrecked here on this space-going clod, where nearly every textbook, novel, film and television show, nearly every blaring screen or billboard or magazine ad, reinforces the idea that "normal" means "heterosexual."
  • Arkansas's new anti-gay law forgets history

    It turns back the clock on civil rights.
  • Hot Springs woman sues; says she was fired for being transgender

    One of the biggest lies of the battle to institutionalize legal discrimination against LGBT people in Arkansas is that protections are unneeded.
  • Presbytery of Arkansas opposes bills aimed at gay discrimination

    The Presbytery of Arkansas, the governing body for Presbyterian churches in the northern two-thirds of Arkansas, met Saturday at Clarksville and adopted a resolution urging Gov. Asa Hutchinson to veto SB 202, which is aimed at preventing local government from passing anti-discrimination laws to protect gay people. The Presbytery also expressed its opposition to a pending House bill that, in the name of "conscience," would protect those who discriminate against gay people.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation