The next big shoe to drop in these cases is the response from the attorney general's office. Might Dustin McDaniel emulate the Pennsylvania attorney general and decline to defend the constitutionally indefensible? Seems unlikely. But what if McDaniel quoted A.G. Kathleen Kane:
“If there is a law that I feel that does not conform with the Pennsylvania state constitution and the U.S. Constitution, then I ethically cannot do that [defend it] as a lawyer,” she said.
CBB, NVR, DF & Goof - Hope y'all are right!
they ALSO find themselves on the horn of a deer limo.
Hate the pun, love the punner.