Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Marriage equality lawsuit gets a different judge

Posted By on Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM

click to enlarge JUDGE PIAZZA: Draws marriage case.
  • JUDGE PIAZZA: Draws marriage case.
Circuit Judge Jay Moody
today granted a plaintiffs' motion and stepped down from hearing the lawsuit challenging the state ban on same-sex marriage. The case was reassigned by the circuit clerk to Judge Chris Piazza.

Action in the case is expected soon on motions to enjoin the state from enforcing the law in the case of gay and lesbian couples legally married in other states who are seeking privileges otherwise granted to couples married in Arkansas. This is the so-called full-faith-and-credit aspect of the law that guides how Arkansas courts customarily have viewed couples who were legally married elsewhere but might not have been able to marry under Arkansas law. First cousins, for example.

Piazza handled a hallmark case of importance to gay people in Arkansas. He struck down the initiated act that attempted to prohibit unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children. The initiative was aimed at preventing gay couples from being parents. He wrote then:

"Due Process and Equal Protection are not hollow words without substance. They are rights enumerated in our constitution that must not be construed in such a way as to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people."

Equal protection is at the heart of the new federal precedent in the Windsor case in which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act because it prevented equal treatment under tax law for a legally married lesbian couple in New York. The ruling has since been used in other states.

The court record says an oral recusal motion was made by plaintiffs, but doesn't reflect the reason it was requested. I have a call in.

Moody was nominated recently by President Obama to fill a federal district court judgeship in Little Rock. That nomination is pending before the Senate.

UPDATE: Cheryl Maples, the lawyer who made the recusal motion, said she had no comment on why she made the motion. A judge is not required to spread on the record reasons for recusal.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • In defense of Planned Parenthood and abortion rights

    An op-ed in today's New York Time by Katha Pollitt says what I've been struggling to say about the reaction to the attack on women's reproductive rights launched by means of the undercover videos made by anti-abortion activists.
    • Aug 5, 2015
  • 'Million-Dollar Thursday': A visit to Sherwood's hot check court

    We take a visit to the weekly hot check court in Sherwood District Court, the subject of a recent civil rights lawsuit filed by ACLU Arkansas and others, who say the system there results in a modern-day debtor's prison
    • Aug 25, 2016
  • State Police issues statement on Jason Rapert 'threats'

    The State Police have issued a minor clarification in what appears to be an effort to soothe an enraged Sen. Jason Rapert, exposed here as overly excited about both a Conway parking lot question from a constituent as well as some inflammatory Internet rhetoric that he's interpreted as a dire threat on his life. State cops took his reports seriously, they say. But in the end, they found nothing actionable.
    • Sep 15, 2015

People who saved…

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation