Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Nate Bell on today's private option vote

Posted By on Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:45 PM

click to enlarge BELL: His amendment picked up his vote. Others?
  • BELL: His amendment picked up his vote. Others?
Rep. Nate Bell opposes the private option but has made a tactical decision to get what he can in this year's fiscal session and come back to fight the policy in 2015. 

Amendments from Bell and Rep. John Burris, which angered many Democrats, were designed to gain or hold Republican votes in the House. But in today's vote, in which the private option fell short of a supermajority by five votes, the only vote flipped by Bell's changes: Bell himself. So what was Bell's reaction to today's vote?

Legislative politics are worse than herding cats. The only thing I can say is you never know, it’s all rhetoric until people push a button. Today there were some people who pushed a button in direct opposition to what they had said just as recently as yesterday. At this point we have to assume that tomorrow is a different day. This got more votes this time than it did on the first vote the last time around and it wound up passing pretty solidly and I expect that it will again. 

I asked Bell what changed over the weekend.

A lot of drama with the typical House-Senate tradeoffs. A lot of people in the House not wanting to be the only people who take the heat, that the Senate has to take their fair share of it as well. …There’s a whole lot of that. Legislative, inter-Capitol politics going on. 

I asked him specifically about the rumors that there were House members who were willing to vote for the private option but wanted the Senate to vote first.

There were people who voted no today specifically for that reason. It would appear [that there were enough of these votes to put it over the top] but who knows. 

Does Bell believe that his amendments will end up being a difference maker in getting the votes for the supermajority?

What I am absolutely confident of is that there was a zero percent chance of anything happening without the amendments. Now, will the amendments be enough? I don’t know the answer to that. They were enough to get my vote. Based on conversations I’ve had with other members, many of whom are still loudly proclaiming that they’re mightily opposed to this — I would just say that many of them have privately told me that they think that’s all they can get. Whether that means that they’ll eventually vote for it or whether they’ll continue to pander to a small group of their supporters, I don’t know the answer to that.  

Tags: , , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Matt Campbell files ethics complaint against Dennis Milligan

    Little Rock attorney and blogger Matt Campbell, whose knack for deep research brought down Mark Darr, Mike Maggio and Dexter Suggs, now has his sights trained on another worthy target. Today, he filed a 113-page ethics complaint against state Treasurer Dennis Milligan that includes 14 separate allegations.
    • Aug 20, 2015
  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • 2nd guilty plea in bribery case over state mental health services

    Arkansas Business reports here on a federal court filing Wednesday that shows a second person has pleaded guilty to a bribery scheme to help a major contractor of the state Department of Human Services.
    • Sep 17, 2015

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

"Locally Labeled" passport expands to accommodate booming brew scene

"Locally Labeled" passport expands to accommodate booming brew scene

As if great beer weren't reward enough, you can earn prizes for sampling local craft beverages

Most Viewed

  • Cotton seeks friendlies for town hall

    Is Tom Cotton working to pack his town hall Wednesday in Springdale with fans. So says one source.
  • NRA opposes campus carry bill as amended

    The NRA, which calls most shots on gun bills in Arkansas, now opposes the campus carry bill primarily because it adds an additional training requirement before anyone 25 and older can take a concealed weapon on a public college campus.
  • House committee approves vote suppression amendment

    A House committee today talked about stripping colleges and the Highway Department of power and tightening procedures on constitutional amendments but in the end voted as Chairman Bob Ballinger orchestrated and expected — to put a Voter ID amendment on the 2018 ballot.
  • Prosecutor Cody Hiland says analysis indicates Damascus is a speed trap

    Prosecuting Attorney Cody Hiland has announced completion of a State Police analysis of Damascus police speed limit enforcement and concluded that statistics indicate tickets are written in excess of limits in law that define speed traps.
  • City board squelches Little Rock school talk

    A letter from Little Rock school activist Dr. Anika Whitfield happens to underscore a point I made earlier today — and in a column to be published this week. It lays some of the school district's problems on benign neglect, and sometimes malice, of the Little Rock City Board.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation