Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Huffington Post digs up Tom Cotton's college column on campaign finance

Posted By on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:48 AM

click to enlarge CRIMSON DAYS: Cotton's college column argued for campaign-finance transparency.
  • CRIMSON DAYS: Cotton's college column argued for campaign-finance transparency.
The Huffington Post’s Michael McAuliff tries to zing Tom Cotton with another old column from his days as a Harvard student, this one arguing for transparency in campaign funding. Nowadays, of course, the Cotton campaign is heavily reliant on “dark money.” Meh, this is kind of a reach, frankly. Here’s McAuliff: 

According to Democratic estimates, more than $5 million in outside money has already poured into the race against Pryor. The Washington Post reported that some $1.4 million from the Koch brothers-backed Americans For Prosperity has gone toward ad buys in Arkansas this cycle. The Sunlight Foundation, which tracks both sides, doesn't have the AFP cash, but does have some $2.5 million in spending about evenly split between the two candidates. Much of the cash for Cotton comes through the Club for Growth, which backed his House bid in 2012.

Judging from Cotton's old op-ed, one might imagine that he'd like to know — and would like for the public to know — who has donated all that money, and what they might want.

But like the money, the Cotton campaign was similarly dark when asked by The Huffington Post Monday if the congressman still had the same views.

If he did, he might consider backing the Senate's DISCLOSE Act, which doesn't undo the Supreme Court's Citizen's United ruling, but does require disclosure of donations above $10,000, setting up a system rather like the one Cotton advocated as a student.

Republicans in the Senate filibustered that bill, so Cotton likely would have been with them.

The hypocrisy charge here, such as it is, is not very strong. Here's the Harvard Crimson column, written when Cotton was a junior. Young Cotton wanted to end campaign-finance regulation and limits on campaign contributions altogether, and hoped to couple that with undefined additional transparency requirements (Cotton's pitch was that campaign-finance laws limiting contributions only served to re-direct funding to "dark money"). Seventeeen years later, Candidate Cotton (like others) benefits from loads of money from various groups that don’t disclose information about their donors, plus probably he opposes the DISCLOSE act, though we don't know for sure. Well, okay. As I said: meh.    

In any case, it goes without saying that Cotton's teenage scribblings are not a very good way to determine what sort of senator Cotton would be. His record wilI suffice. I do think old writings of a public figure are kind of interesting, but my main takeaway is that I personally find the oddball, mannered intellectual Cotton that occasionally pops up in these college writings more engaging than the robo-candidate of today. What happened to the guy churning out sentences like this: "The Democrats' guile depicts not lawlessness but unseemliness"? Unseemly! I'm not the target audience, obviously, but it would have been more fun if Cotton went for a William F. Buckley-in-fatigues vibe rather than the creepy talking-point machine spying on poor people at grocery stores. Oh well. 

As to the campaign-finance issue, college-age Cotton was right on the merits that the American electoral system needs more transparency regarding donations to campaigns. Advocates of campaign-finance reform would likely disagree with the column regarding unlimited direct contributions, but I think there's an argument to be made that strict disclosure laws are more achievable and enforceable (both legally and logistically) than attempts to cap donations. The DISCLOSE Act would be a good start (Pryor supported it, Cotton hasn't commented). 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Speaking of...

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

  • Democratic party chair: Mark Martin's response to tax problems "despicable"

    Democratic Party of Arkansas Chair Vincent Insalaco released a statement today on Secretary of State Mark Martin, who appears to have improperly taken two homestead tax exemptions (only one is allowed) since at least 2008 and perhaps as far back as 2003. Martin blamed his trouble on opponents' "politics of personal destruction." Insalaco said Martin's response was "despicable."
    • Aug 18, 2014
  • Open line

    The line is open. It's yours.
    • Aug 17, 2014
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Michelle Duggar and the Family Council try to torpedo Fayetteville non-discrimination ordinance with lies

    The Arkansas Family Council has enlisted Michelle Duggar to oppose a Fayetteville non-discrimination ordinance with a fear-mongering robocall.
  • Fayetteville Council votes 6-2 for civil rights ordinance that protects gay, transgender people

    At 3:20 a.m. today, the Fayetteville City Council voted 6-2 to approve a historic civil rights ordinance that includes LGBT people in its umbrella of employment, housing and accommodation protections. The vote followed 10 hours of comment from 140 people and poignant testimony from gay and transgender people about discrimination they've experienced.
  • Train derailment in Hoxie kills 2; homes evacuated

    Two people were killed with two trains collided near Hwy. 67 early this morning, and State Police are evacuating residents of the southern end of the city while the trains burn. U.S. 67 south of Hoxie and U.S. 63 are closed. The trains were carrying hazardous chemicals.
  • Minimum wage group turns in nearly 70,000 additional signatures

    Give Arkansas a Raise Now, the group seeking to qualify a ballot measure to raise the state minimum wage from $6.25 to $8.50 an hour by 2017, turned in an additional 69,070 signatures to the Arkansas Secretary of State's office today.
  • American Bridge releases report on Koch brothers' environmental impacts and layoffs

    American Bridge, the liberal PAC formed by David Brock, the former Clinton foe now dedicated to round-the-clock Hillary Clinton defender, is out today with a new report on environmental impacts and layoffs from Koch Industries. The report focuses on the business activities of the Koch brothers — more famous for hundreds of millions in political spending aimed at slashing government services, regulation and taxes — in twelve states, including Arkansas. From the report: "The Kochs' extreme, self-serving agenda is bad for working families. And that reality is starkly embodied not only by their political persuasions, but by their business endeavors."

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation