Find out more →

Get unlimited access. Become a digital member!

Monday, May 5, 2014

Meteorologist defends EF4 rating on Vilonia tornado

Posted By on Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:12 AM

click to enlarge BAD ENOUGH: Pictures tell a sufficient story of the Vilonia tornado, no matter where it falls on the Fujita scale. But, note: Thrown cars are not part of the measuring standard. - KARK
  • KARK
  • BAD ENOUGH: Pictures tell a sufficient story of the Vilonia tornado, no matter where it falls on the Fujita scale. But, note: Thrown cars are not part of the measuring standard.

Meteorologist John Robinson with the National Weather Service in North Little Rock issued an explainer today on why the Vilonia tornado earned an EF4 rating rather than the top rating of EF5. For one thing, thrown vehicles don't count in the computation.

As expected, we are getting all sorts of comments about why the tornado was not rated EF5 in Vilonia.

Here's something to keep in mind: First and foremost, if a house that has a foundation built with nuts, bolts, and appropriate-sized washers is swept away, leaving only the concrete foundation, the "expected value" of wind in the Enhanced Fujita Scale is 200 mph, which puts it at the top of the EF4 category, not an EF5. It would have to be an exceptionally well-built house to go over 200 mph and thus achieve an EF5.

It's my understanding that when the Enhanced Fujita Scale was put together this was done for a very specific reason — that some on the committee felt that a house should never be rated EF5. The final outcome was that the "expected value" was placed so that it would be very rare that a house could be rated EF5.

Note that, whether the rating was EF4 or EF5, it would be expected that the house would be destroyed.

So, for the house in Vilonia that came closest to exceeding EF4, we also followed a couple of other "rules" that we use in assessing tornado damage.

First, one structure should not be used to determine a rating. Second, there were still some tall, skinny trees standing along a drainage ditch/small creek about 100 yards away from the house. I have seen something like this in the past, and the expert rated lower because of vegetation that was still standing nearby. To put it another way, the people doing the rating are supposed to take into account the entire scene, not just one thing in the middle of it.

Another thing that has been debated considerably: When a structure has been hit by a large amount of debris, how much of the damage was truly from the tornado itself vs. the amount of damage that was caused by flying debris from other structures?

As I have noted previously, we saw a much greater than normal number of vehicles that had been thrown around. Vehicles are not one of the damage indicators in the Enhanced Fujita Scale, so whether they were thrown 50 feet, 50 yards, etc., does not tell us anything about what EF-Scale rating to assign.

While I'm talking about objects being thrown, the construction company that is working on the new school in Vilonia that was badly damaged was kind enough to calculate the approximate weight of the large storage container that was thrown onto the roof. It weighed approximately 25,000 pounds, counting the container and its contents.

Finally, I am on the committee that is working to update the Enhanced Fujita Scale. Very few people working in NWS field offices are on this committee, which is composed of meteorologists, engineers, tree experts and others. Thus, I get to hear plenty of discussions about all aspects of rating tornadoes.

Here's a more detailed discussion from the Weather Service on what it found about use of anchor bolts to hold houses to foundations (not often, or improperly installed). An engineering professor is quoted:

In the whole scheme of things, this type of tornado seldom occurs, and its path is fairly narrow (usually less than a mile). The odds are remote that any one location is impacted by such a tornado. While the low risk will settle some stomachs, the absence of anchor bolts does not sit well with Dr. Prevatt:

"Bottom-line - we either build them (our houses) stronger or communities must accept that certain number of homes randomly selected by nature's wrath, will be blown away and kill people in every moderately strong tornado for the foreseeable future."

UPDATE: The Weather Service also provided a discussion from the Department of Emergency Management about the death of one person whose family was otherwise protected in a "safe room" when a door caved in. The room had not undergone a government inspection, which ADEM recommends.
click to enlarge ADEMnewsrelase__1_.jpg

Tags: , , , , ,

Speaking of...

  • Baby it's cold outside, temperatures set records

    May 15, 2014
    The National Weather Service notes record lows all over Arkansas this morning — including 43 at North Little Rock, well below the old record of 48 and third-lowest May temperature ever. It fell to a record 39 in Jacksonville. and the 42 recorded in Pine Bluff broke a 107-year-old record. /more/
  • Obama visit to Arkansas: Photo coverage

    May 7, 2014
    Benjamin Krain, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's talented photographer, was assigned the local photography spot in the press pool assembled to cover President Obama's visit to Arkansas today. That gave other media access to his photos on the trip, and D-G chief photographer Jeff MItchell, provided a selection of them from the president's three hours on the ground. There's a shot, too, of the security precautions evident during the visit. /more/
  • UPDATED: Obama comes and goes from Arkansas, met by friendly crowds. 'You are not alone,' he says.

    May 7, 2014
    Here's the complete local press pool report of President Obama's visit today in Arkansas, a smooth trip that included meetings with victims and disaster workers. Big, friendly crowds greeted the president, who promised Arkansas that the federal government would be there for them in their time of need. /more/
  • Tracking President Obama's visit to Arkansas

    May 7, 2014
    Lots of opportunities today on Twitter, Facebook and commercial media to keep up with President Obama's three-hour touchdown to view tornado damage in Arkansas and meet victims, first responders and relief workers. KARK is promising live-streaming video of the three-hour visit. /more/
  • Checking in with Sen. Jason Rapert on Obama visit to Arkansas today

    May 7, 2014
    I checked in with Sen. Jason Rapert on Twitter this morning to see if he'd join President Obama on his visit today to tornado damage in Arkansas, a long swath that includes part of Rapert's district. He has other plans, but ultimately issued kind words about a presidential visit. /more/
  • Tim Griffin proposes use of oil spill homes to house tornado victims

    May 6, 2014
    KARK reports on a proposal by U.S. Rep. Tim Griffin for Exxon/Mobil to provide homes in the Mayflower neighborhood trashed by its Pegasus pipeline rupture to make empty homes it has purchased available for housing for nearby victims of the recent tornado. Does that mean they're safe? /more/
  • Infant death increases tornado toll to 16

    May 5, 2014
    An infant died shortly after birth to a woman injured in the Faulkner County tornado, Faulkner County civil attorney David Hogue said this afternoon. The death is believed related to the injuries. The child's identity has not yet been released. /more/
  • More »

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30



© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation