Sunday, June 1, 2014

ACLU criticizes secretary of state's effort on Voter ID education

Posted By on Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:06 AM

click to enlarge voter-id-requirement-graphic1.jpg
In addition to challenging the new Voter ID law, the ACLU makes the good case in this article by John Lyon of Stephens Media that Secretary of State Mark Martin's office did a poor job of educating voters about it.

Martin's office spent a whopping $45,000 on voter education. Holly Dickson, ACLU house counsel, says instructions on absentee voting forms and posters at polling places were inadequate to the task of preparing voters for the change. Evidence is abundant that she's right in, particularly, huge disqualifications of mailed absentee votes, along with in-person challenges for lack of ID.

The article also mentions a problem that will be even bigger in November if the law isn't enjoined  or the secretary of state and others on the board of election commissioners don't do something about widespread illegal interpretation of the law by election officials. Officials across the state illegally challenged voters based on information on photo IDs, which are to be used only for photo purposes, not to match against voter roll information on addresses and age. To date, I've yet to hear a word of concern about this from Mark Martin or any of his henchmen.

And giving a few radio interviews — cited by a Martin spokesman as proof of the office's publicity effort — won't get the job done.

But, you have to remember,  Republicans intended this law to disqualify voters. It's working, particularly in targeted groups  — elderly, poor and minority voters.

I had to laugh at the defense by Sen. Bryan King, sponsor of the vote suppression law, of the pitifully small amount of education effort by Mark Martin — versus millions spent in some other states. He said one objection to Voter ID was its cost, so ,hey, they decided not to spend any money on education.

Standard disclosure: I'm a board member of a public interest nonprofit, the Arkansas Public Law Center, which is supporting the lawsuit over the Voter ID law. We supported the suit because we believe, as Circuit Judge Tim Fox ruled, that it added an unconstitutional additional requirement to voting.

Tags: , , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • In defense of Planned Parenthood and abortion rights

    An op-ed in today's New York Time by Katha Pollitt says what I've been struggling to say about the reaction to the attack on women's reproductive rights launched by means of the undercover videos made by anti-abortion activists.
    • Aug 5, 2015
  • AHTD asks Metroplan to lift six-lane freeway cap

    The board of directors of Metroplan has informed the state highway department that it cannot act on the highway department's June 17 request to lift its six-lane freeway cap at the board's June 29 meeting. Consideration of the request should take four months, Jacksonville Mayor Gary Fletcher wrote June 22 to highway department Director Scott Bennett.
    • Jun 23, 2016
  • The plight of the refugees: Dark episodes in Arkansas

    Ernest Dumas reaches into history, some personal, for moments in Arkansas's view of refugees. It was brought to mind by the current crisis in Europe and the political divisions over whether the U.S. should respond to the needs of the displaced.
    • Sep 22, 2015

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation