Thursday, June 26, 2014

Supreme Court upholds one contempt citation in Hastings trial, but reverses nine issued at conclusion

Posted By on Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM

click to enlarge WINS ON 9 OF 10" Attorney Bill James, shown after contempt hearing that was set aside today by Supreme Court.
  • WINS ON 9 OF 10" Attorney Bill James, shown after contempt hearing that was set aside today by Supreme Court.
The Arkansas Supreme Court today upheld one, but reversed nine contempt citations Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen had issued against defense attorney Bill James in the manslaughter trial of former Little Rock police officer Josh Hastings.

The Court said Griffen had properly held James in contempt summarily during the trial for bringing up information about the criminal records of witnesses against Hastings, contrary to the judge's order. But the court said nine contempt citations Griffen added at the conclusion of the trial (which ended in a hung jury) were improper because they had not been issued immediately and thus James was entitled to a reasonable amount of time to raise a defense. No hearing on those citations was held.

The Supreme Court went on to say about the post-trial citations that it believed Griffen was incorrect in holding James in contempt on those counts. While James had attempted to question witnesses about state of mind, the court said James had not questioned about their records, the explicit instruction of the judge's order.

"James cannot be held in contempt for not following what the court meant to order, but can only be held in contempt for violating the circuit court's express commands."

Griffen had originally fined James $2,500 each on the citations, but reduced the penalty to $500.

After two mistrials, the prosecution declined to try again to prosecute Hastings for fatally shooting a man in a car he'd suspected in car burglaries. Hastings said he fired because he felt endangered by the car. Police questioned Hastings' honesty about events. Hastings was fired and has appealed the firing.

Here's the full opinion.

Tags: , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Arkansas Supreme Court denies rehearing in death penalty challenge, but delays mandate

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today refused to rehear the case denying Death Row inmates information about drugs used by the state in the lethal injection process.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • Welspun layoffs: Another example of corporate welfare folly

    Layoffs at the Welspun pipe plant in Little Rock are a reminder of the folly of corporate welfare and the inability of Arkansas to separate itself from global economic forces. See the Fayetteville shale. And keep a watchful eye on that Sun Paper pulp mill proposed near Arkadelphia.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • Hamburg bank manager gets 21 months for theft

    Melinda Gwin, 49, of Hamburg has been sentenced to 21 months in federal prison and ordered to repay $210,875 stolen from the First National Bank of Crossett. She was sentenced in El Dorado federal court, according to a Justice Department news release.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Tackling autism, child by child

    An Arkansas Children's Hospital doctor is testing a new drug that targets one of a host of ailments the highly individual disorder can cause.
  • 1957 all over again

    Last week, the State Board of Education voted to ignore federal courts and allow school district transfers that will encourage segregation.
  • Death penalty lives

    Barely clinging to its flagging life, the death penalty got a merciful reprieve last month from the unlikeliest quarter, the Arkansas Supreme Court.
  • Drinking culture

    Here we go again. At the rate these campus sexual abuse sagas are making news, it's reasonable to ask what college administrators can possibly be thinking about.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation