Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Conflicting opinons on Affordable Care Act

Posted By on Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:15 AM

UPDATE: Here are two separate judicial decisions. One is judicial activism, but conservatives will love it.

* A WIN FOR ACTIVISM: A D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has ruled 2-1 (two Republicans in the majority) that participants in federally operated health insurance exchanges in 36 states cannot qualify for federal subsidies. These are the states, including Arkansas, that didn't set up their own health insurance marketplaces and left it to the government.

The ruling does not affect the private option version of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. But some 40,000 Arkansans have signed up for the exchange, most of them receiving subsidies. About 5 million Americans are receiving benefits in the affected states.

* A WIN FOR THE OBAMCARE LAWNot long after the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that indeed federally run exchanges COULD qualify for subsidies.

In the 4th Circuit decision, Gregory wrote that it's "clear that widely available tax credits are essential to fulfilling the Act’s primary goals and that Congress was aware of their importance when drafting the bill." He noted that only 16 state-run Obamacare exchanges are currently in place and that the economic framework for the law would "crumble" without federal exchange subsidies.

"Furthermore, without an exception to the individual mandate, millions more Americans unable to purchase insurance without the credits would be forced to pay a penalty that Congress never envisioned imposing on them," he wrote. "The IRS Rule avoids both these unforeseen and undesirable consequences and thereby advances the true purpose and means of the Act."



Short run: Status quo.

The Obama administration will ask for a ruling by the entire D.C. Circuit. Opponents can do the same in the 4th Circuit. Whatever either court decides will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. With a conflict between the circuits looming, the Supreme Court will have to enter the battle.

A practical battle looms in states that didn't set up exchanges if the adverse D.C. Circuit decision holds. Will they really insist that working taxpayers be stripped of federal subsidies in a fit of ideological zeal to continue their battle against Obamacare?

Normally, conservative Republicans don't like judges who mess with the laws of Congress and state legislatures. Except when they like the outcome.

David Ramsey has backgrounded this fight for us previously. And also here.

He notes that the average premium for people who gets subsidies in Arkansas is $94 a month. Without the subsidies, it would be $387. So, sure, if this opinion holds, can I get a Republican vote for royally screwing those 36,000 Arkies (90 percent of those on the exchange get subsidies)?

PS — Tom Cotton, naturally, praises the D.C. judicial activism, which dissenter Harry Edwards describes as just an effort to gut the law. If you can't pay for your own health coverage, Tom Cotton says, "tough." Cotton calls the subsidies "unlawful," in a news release issue either before or maliciously disregarding the 4th Circuit ruling.

Tags: ,

Favorite

Speaking of Obamacare, insurance Exchanges

Comments (26)

Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • No-cost highways? See college tuitions

    The side effects of a no-tax highway construction programs and restrictive state budgeting continue to roll in. Add the University of Arkansas to the list of colleges in Arkansas with plans to raise tuition and fees.
    • May 23, 2016
  • Monday's open line

    Here's your Monday open line and video news roundup.
    • May 23, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Foster family disputes key statements from Justin Harris

    Craig and Cheryl Hart were the foster parents of the two sisters who were adopted by Rep. Justin Harris and his wife Marsha and later "rehomed." The Harts say that the adoption was allowed to proceed over the objections of the foster parents and local DHS staff due to pressure exerted by Cecile Blucker, head of the Division of Children and Family Services, on behalf of Justin Harris.
    • Mar 7, 2015
  • That racist Leslie Rutledge email

    Blue Hog Report's Matt Campbell has unearthed an email from Leslie Rutledge's time as a lawyer with the Department of Human Services that, unlike a previous email forward that caught the attention of the Arkansas Blog and others, is going to be hard for the Republican candidate for attorney general to explain away. It's a story, which Rutledge appears to be passing along from a friend, written entirely in racist dialect.
    • Oct 9, 2014
  • Good news abounds even if you don't see it in the polls

    Ernest Dumas is back from vacation with a column that chronicles abundant good news in the land and an electorate that either pays it no mind or disbelieves anything could be good on Barack Obama's watch.
    • Oct 21, 2014

Most Shared

  • The museum of yet to come at the University of Arkansas

    At the McMillon Family Retail Innovation and Technology Lab, students and faculty are creating a space that will give both visitors and companies a vital glimpse of the stores, products and consumer habits of the future.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: You need this T-shirt

    • PROCEDURE OF JOINING the great Illuminati brotherhood.. GREAT ILLUMINATI TEMPLE Of MONEY AND POWER, JOIN…

    • on May 24, 2016
  • Re: Huckabee demagoguery closes schools in Kentucky

    • Are you from SOUTH AFRICA, USA, OR ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD TODAY BE RICH, FAME,…

    • on May 24, 2016
  • Re: Monday's open line

    • Newly minted Christian theocrat Donald Trump just appointed Frank Amedia — pastor of Touch Heaven…

    • on May 24, 2016

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation