Tuesday, September 30, 2014

AG candidate Leslie Rutledge's voter registration cancelled by Pulaski Co. clerk

Posted By on Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:40 PM

click to enlarge ITINERANT REGISTRATION: Not that there's anything wrong with that. Necessarily.
  • ITINERANT REGISTRATION: Not that there's anything wrong with that. Necessarily.
Dave Ramsey just wrote at length about the open coordination between Leslie Rutledge and a super PAC advocating for her election (though perhaps not illegal, it's certainly irregular campaign finance). Now, Blue Hog Report breaks the news that Pulaski County Clerk Larry Crane cancelled Rutledge's voter registration on Tuesday afternoon after being informed late last week that she's simultaneously registered in Washington D.C., and perhaps Virginia as well. The D-G confirms.

Matt Campbell, who runs Blue Hog, points out that this would seem to make Rutledge ineligible to hold office in Arkansas, according to the state Constitution. Hmm. Republicans on Twitter are calling foul, saying that Crane purged Rutledge from the voter rolls out of political motives.

(I'll be honest: I'm not sure of the law about this one. If a county clerk discovers that a voter is registered elsewhere, is s/he required to cancel that voter's registration, or is there some discretion involved? We'll post more as the story develops.)

I should be clear that being registered to vote in more than one place is neither unethical nor even especially unusual in itself. If you move around a lot, it's entirely possible to be registered in more than one state at once, and while that may be technically against the rules, it's usually simply a mistake. It'd be a lot of effort (and a lot of felony criminal liability) to try to exploit being registered in two states for the purposes of casting a single extra ballot.

This is exactly why arguments for voter ID and various other election "integrity" schemes are so spurious: dotting I's and crossing T's on voter registration is the last thing on most of our minds, and disenfranchising voters because of technicalities is a terrible way to run a democracy.

Then again, in the case of Rutledge, she's not just any voter: She's running for one of the highest offices in the state, and the fact is simply that technicalities get magnified by the spotlight of the campaign. (As for voter ID — she supports it, of course.


Comments (84)

Showing 1-50 of 84

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-50 of 84

Add a comment

More by Benjamin Hardy

Readers also liked…

  • Not everyone is in Tom Cotton fan club

    Conservative New York newspaper labels Tom Cotton and others "traitors" for injecting themselves into presidential diplomacy with Iran.
    • Mar 10, 2015
  • University of Arkansas education reformers receive grand prize for 'bunkum' in charter school reports

    The National Education Policy Center, a Colorado-based institution that is frequently opposed to the so-called "reform" movement embodied by the Walton-financed Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, has issued its 2014 Bunkum Awards, which include a grand prize to the University of Arkansas for what it believes to be flawed research.
    • Mar 3, 2015
  • On the cover: A legislator's adoption and 'rehoming'

    This week's cover story is an important one by Benjamin Hardy about an adoption practice of "rehoming" that has become controversial nationwide and the harm that befell a child who'd been placed in another's care after being adopted by a state legislator.
    • Mar 3, 2015

People who saved…

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation