Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Tom Cotton absolutely refuses to answer questions about the 200,000 Arkansans on the private option who would lose coverage if Obamacare repealed

Posted By on Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM

click to enlarge COTTON: Loves to talk about repealing Obamacare, refuses to talk about what that means -- repealing the private option.
  • COTTON: Loves to talk about repealing Obamacare, refuses to talk about what that means -- repealing the private option.

This is getting outrageous.

Rep. Tom Cotton is running for U.S. Senate, advocating root-and-branch repeal of Obamacare as the key tenet of his platform, and he refuses to be honest about the impacts that policy change would have on Arkansans. For all of his big talk of principled stands and doing "the hard right over the easy wrong," he has shown himself afraid or unwilling to level with the people of Arkansas about the policy change he is advocating for. Cotton's explicit plan would repeal the private option, ending health insurance coverage for 200,000 Arkansans. He just won't admit it. 

Lots of folks are pointing out that in yesterday’s Senate debate in Kentucky, Sen. Mitch McConnell gave absolute nonsense answers on what would happen to the hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians who have gained coverage if McConnell was successful in his goal of repealing the Affordable Care Act. 

Here's McConnell:  

Kentucky Kynect is a website. It was paid for by a grant from the federal government. The website can continue, but in my view the best interests of the country would be achieved by pulling out Obamacare root and branch. ... It’s fine to have a website.

Even in the context of a political debate, this stands out as cynical, transparently dishonest, and stupid. Horse manure fit for Churchill Downs.

Kynect is not simply a website, it is the health insurance marketplace created and funded by Obamacare (as well as the portal through which people enroll in the Medicaid expansion funded by Obamacare). Around 500,000 Kentuckians have health insurance coverage via Kynect. That's via Obamacare. If Obamacare goes away, Kynect would go away, and the health insurance for those 500,000 Kentuckians would go away. McConnell said it was a "state exchange," Kentucky "can continue it if they'd like to" and Medicaid expansion was a "state decision." This is utter sophistry. If Obamacare goes away, the funding for the coverage expansion would go away. Is McConnell suggesting that Kentucky pay for the coverage expansion on its own? If so, how? McConnell is peddling a fantasy convincing only to someone not paying much attention (that's probably the point) — that Obamacare can vanish while Kentucky somehow gets to keep all the popular stuff about Obamacare (like Kynect) that Kentuckians like. See here and here and here for more.  

If McConnell's answer was nonsense, Cotton simply refused to answer at all. There was a remarkable moment in last night's debate when panelist Gwen Moritz asked the candidates this: 

If you are elected, what would you like to see happen to the ACA? And please include in your answer exactly what effect your proposal would have on the 200,000 Arkansans who are now insured by the Arkansas private option...

Emphasis mine. The question was specific and clear. Cotton's two-minute response did not say a single word about the private option, or what would happen to the 200,000 Arkansans who would lose their coverage. Nor did he say a single word about the 40,000 other Arkansans who are enrolled in plans they purchased on the Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace, the exchange created by Obamacare (90 percent of whom receive Obamacare subsidies to lower the cost of their insurance). They too would lose their health insurance if Obamacare was repealed. 

Cotton said Obamacare was a "disaster" for Arkansas, but said nothing — even when explicitly asked — about almost a quarter of a million people who have gained coverage, which remarkably has already cut the uninsurance rate in Arkansas in half. "What effect," as Moritz put it, would his proposal have on them? He gave a laundry list of conservative talking points on health care reform: selling insurance across state lines, small business insurance pools, and block granting Medicaid (which, in the versions that Cotton voted for in the Ryan budget and the Republican Study Committee budgets, involves not only eliminating Medicaid expansion, but also massive funding cuts to the existing Medicaid program on top of that, including programs for kids such as ARKids).

Whatever one thinks of the merits or costs or feasibility of these individual ideas, there in nothing in Cotton's response that would come anywhere close to offering coverage to the 240,000 Arkansans who would stand to lose their coverage if Obamacare was repealed. There is nothing in the response, as Pryor noted, that would address insurance companies discriminating against people who have pre-existing conditions attempting to buy health insurance, a practice banned by Obamacare. Or what about community rating, which keeps insurance companies from price discriminating against women? Or what about subsidies for people low-to-moderate-income people to buy individual health insurance? Or what about people being able to stay on their parents' plan until age 26? 

If Cotton has a plan to cover all the folks on the private option after he eliminates all the funding for it, he needs to say so. If he has a plan to keep all of the popular parts of Obamacare in place while simultaneously repealing Obamacare, he needs to say so. Nothing in his responses at this debate, or in numerous other public statements on this topic, suggests he has anything of the kind.

Cotton has steadfastly refused to take a position on the private option, calling it a "state-based issue." He has dodged it over and over and over and over and over and over

This is simple: the private option is funded by Obamacare. If you repeal Obamacare, the private option goes away. Health insurance for 200,000 Arkansans covered by the private option goes away. There's no mystery about this: Cotton has voted to repeal Medicaid expansion numerous times. 

There are lots of tradeoffs inherent in the health care law, and it’s perfectly coherent for a conservative to advocate for repeal even though repeal means eliminating benefits, including benefits that are politically popular. Perhaps Cotton's position is simply that the safety net for health care should be less robust. That's fine. But it's time for him to stand behind the real-world consequences of his policy preferences. It's time for him to own that. It's time for him to be honest. It's time for him to explain himself to directly to those Arkansas who would lose their coverage if Obamacare was repealed. 

Tom Cotton said "Obama" 74 times in yesterday's debate. But oddly, when it comes to what would happen if the hated Obamacare went away, he clammed right up.  

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (18)

Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Mike Huckabee, meet James Madison

    Not that it will do much good, but Times columnist Ernest Dumas this week provides some useful Founding Father history, plus a little bit of Bible, for how wrong-headed Mike Huckabee, Asa Hutchinson, the Republican legislature and others are in using government to enforce their religious views.
    • May 26, 2015
  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016
  • Cosmopolitan: Why were the Duggars made famous in the first place?

    A writer in Cosmopolitan wonders why it took so long for attention to the "disturbingly misogynistic" dimension of the Jim Bob Duggar family.
    • May 28, 2015

Most Shared

  • Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist resigns

    Bob Scoggin, 50, the Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist whose job it was to review the work of agencies, including DAH and the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, for possible impacts on historic properties, resigned from the agency on Monday. Multiple sources say Scoggin, whom they describe as an "exemplary" employee who the week before had completed an archeological project on DAH property, was told he would be fired if he did not resign.
  • Arkansas Democrats' rocky road forward

    No state political party in the modern era has had a more abrupt fall than Arkansas's Democrats
  • Child welfare too often about 'punishing parents,' DCFS consultant tells legislators

    Reforms promised by the Division of Children and Family Services are "absolutely necessary," the president of DCFS's independent consultant told a legislative committee this morning. But they still may not be enough to control the state's alarming growth in foster care cases.
  • Donald Trump taps Tom Price for HHS Secretary; Medicaid and Medicare cuts could be next

    The selection of Tom Price as HHS secretary could signal that the Trump administration will dismantle the current healthcare safety net, both Medicaid and Medicare.
  • Fake economics

    Fake news is a new phenomenon in the world of politics and policy, but hokey economic scholarship has been around as long as Form 1040 and is about as reliable as the news hoaxes that enlivened the presidential campaign.

Visit Arkansas

Arkansas remembers Pearl Harbor

Arkansas remembers Pearl Harbor

Central Arkansas venues have a full week of commemorative events planned

Most Viewed

  • The gloomy Sunday line

    For now, over to you.
  • Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist resigns

    Bob Scoggin, 50, the Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist whose job it was to review the work of agencies, including DAH and the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, for possible impacts on historic properties, resigned from the agency on Monday. Multiple sources say Scoggin, whom they describe as an "exemplary" employee who the week before had completed an archeological project on DAH property, was told he would be fired if he did not resign.
  • New York Times columnist calls Pine Bluff nonprofit leader "America's Mother Teresa"

    Annette Dove, the founder and CEO of the Pine Bluff nonprofit Targeting Our People's Priorities with Service (TOPPS), is the subject of a glowing column profile by the New York Times Nicholas Kristof. In the wake of a a dispiriting election, Dove is "a salve for our aches and wounds, for she represents the American grass roots’ best," Kristoff writes.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation