Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Senate committee approves tax cut bill with capital gains break repeal and break for two-income couples

Posted By on Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:40 AM

Just like that, Gov. Asa Hutchinson's $100 million income tax cut bill was approved in a Senate committee this morning.

Benji Hardy says it includes a new amendment, not yet available on-line, pertaining to the capital gains tax. Is this the delay of the 2013 capital gains tax listed as a possibility as Hutchinson works to make his taxing and spending plans fit circumstances?

UPDATE: The amendment REPEALS the 2013 capital gains tax cut. It makes a good bill better, said Sen. Bill Sample, who introduced it. It passed without dissension. This is monumental if the House goes along, though it's worth remembering that's where the big capital gains tax cut originated in 2013, with Speaker Davy Carter.

That capital gains tax cut reduced the tax on sale of investments to 50 percent this year and a total elimination of gains over $10 million. The estimated cost this year is  almost $21 million.

This would be a progressive step, in that the benefits otherwise would go only to the richest taxpayers and it is a tax break on investment, not labor. The biggest beneficiaries stand to be people who have sold assets acquired at little or no cost, such as Walton family Walmart stock. 

Hutchinson's tax bill cuts the tax rate on middle-class taxpayers. Those making more than $21,000 but less than a little more than $35,000 will pay 5 percent rather than 6 percent of taxable income and those making $35,000 to $75,000 will pay 6 rather than 7 percent. As it stands, the top tax rate of 7 percent kicks in around $35,000.

In normal Republican terminology, you could now say Hutchinson's tax cut includes two tax increases.

It delays a cut in the top marginal tax rate from 7 to 6.9 percent adopted in 2013. Conservatives normally frame delayed tax cuts as tax increases.

A repeal of the capital gains tax cut similarly would be termed a tax increase, in that taxpayers now will face a higher rate than put into law in 2013.

I'm not complaining, just observing.

Also: In case you missed it yesterday. I realized an interesting wrinkle about Hutchinson's weird tiered tax plan, which creates multiple sliding scales of tax rates depending on income, rather than a single scale.

It has the quirk of giving a significant tax break to many families with two incomes. You might even say the Hutchinson plan is an encouragement for women to work outside the home.

As I mentioned yesterday: Under Hutchinson's bill, a married couple each making $75,000 can file separately on the same tax form and, thanks to his cuts, pay almost $1,900 less in taxes than a married couple with a single wage earner making $150,000 because they may double up the standard deduction. This advantage of separate filing for double income couples can produce significant benefits in both the big brackets favored by Hutchinson — between $21,000 and $35,000 and $35,000 and $75,000.

Two people making $30,000 would be taxed at 5 percent, not the 6 percent rate applied to a couple with a single earner making $60,000. And so on and on. Wherever two incomes fall below a bracket cliff, even though the combined income would put them in a higher bracket, the filers can take advantage of the lower rate.

Same family income. Different tax rate. The lower income family benefits.

This is pretty unorthodox for a Republican governor.

UPDATE: Just got a copy of Sample's amendment. It simply repeals a reduction of the capital gains tax to 50 percent of the normal tax rate in 2015 and removes the total exemption granted to gains of greater than $10 million.

NOTE: An original post has been edited to remove and clarify some outdated descriptions of the 2013 legislation that I used erroneously.

Tags: , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Friday's open line

    The daily video and an open line.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • White flag waved on Trumpcare

    House Republicans pulled down the Trumpcare legislation this afternoon and walked out, depriving Democrats of some fun in pointing out all the anti-woman, anti-poor, pro-rich aspects of a bill too generous for hardcare Republicans and too mean for the few remaining moderates.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • Jones Bar-B-Q of Marianna has a related outpost in Jacksonville

    The legendary Jones Bar-B-Q Diner of Marianna is about to have a kissing cousin — supposedly with the same key recipes — in Jacksonville.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Maddie's Place makes a believer out of a skeptic

    After a long hiatus, I return to Maddie's Place in Riverdale and find the food is a lot tastier than I remembered.
    • Aug 19, 2015
  • UPDATE: Judge rethinking punishment for attorneys in insurance settlement case

    Judge P.K. Holmes is rethinking whether lawyers deserve punishment in a class action lawsuit against an insurance company abruptly pulled from his court after pending more than a year and then quickly settled in a state court.
    • Jun 24, 2016
  • Matt Campbell files ethics complaint against Dennis Milligan

    Little Rock attorney and blogger Matt Campbell, whose knack for deep research brought down Mark Darr, Mike Maggio and Dexter Suggs, now has his sights trained on another worthy target. Today, he filed a 113-page ethics complaint against state Treasurer Dennis Milligan that includes 14 separate allegations.
    • Aug 20, 2015

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation