Friday, January 30, 2015

Arkansas Ethics: When an election ad is not an election ad

Posted By on Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:32 AM

NO FOUL: Ethics Commission during deliberation of complaint over ads supporting Leslie Rutledge's election. - FOX 16
  • Fox 16
  • NO FOUL: Ethics Commission during deliberation of complaint over ads supporting Leslie Rutledge's election.

I've already lamented the Arkansas Ethics Commission's decision that $300,000 or more in TV ad spending featuring Leslie Rutledge, a candidate for attorney general, was not sufficiently explicit to be viewed as a campaign contribution.

Ethics Commission Director Graham Sloan did say to me in casual conversation that he could see how a "lay person" might interpret spending by a Republican political group on ads featuring Rutledge an ad meant to help elect her.

Who else are ads directed at, but "lay persons"? Voters in other words.

Little Rock lawyer Matt Campbell, who filed the complain, received the formal notification of the 4-0 vote to dismiss his complaint. It sets out in detail the reasoning by which the Commission exonerate Rutledges admitted coordination with the Republican group on the ad. It gives you no hope for greater Ethics Commission oversight of ethics laws in Arkansas under Amendment 94.

The ad did not pass the plain sight test. With ample room in changing U.S. Supreme Court law to to declare a quacking duck a duck, the Ethics Commission declined to do so. In the process, it opened the door for more of this sham by outside groups for favored candidates.

Campbell summarized the outcome on Facebook last night:

Got the decision letter from the Arkansas Ethics Commission this afternoon. Apparently, the commissioners felt that *someone* could see an ad where Leslie Rutledge, identified as a candidate for AG, talks about what she would do if elected AG, then tells people to call a number owned by her AG campaign, as something other than an ad encouraging people to vote for her for the office of AG.

No, seriously. That was their "reasoning."

Rutledge and the group whose dark money backed her merely argued that this was protected 1st Amendment expression. Campaign contribution limits and other efforts to promote transparency in elections are rapidly falling under Citizens United and citizens commissions afraid to say what their own eyes should tell them. Rutledge got $300,000 in a direct TV ad buy featuring her. The limits on giving are $2,000. We don't even know who gave the $300,000. The Ethics Commission said this is perfectly fine.

Be afraid of what's to come.

Here's the full opinion.

Discussion on Campbell's Facebook mentions a slim possibility of judicial review. A better course of action is to fix the law. That would seem unlikey at a Republican legislature, because it would seem a repudiation of tactics of a Republican candidate. But as Rutledge's lawyer, Kevin Crass noted, this similar tactic has been used in other states by Democratic candidates backed by dark money groups. Good government is not always a partisan exercise. It's just good government. If the "Ethics" Commission can't do it, maybe the people can.

Tags: , , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • How about cheese dip for lunch Saturday?

    Big day in Little Rock tomorrow, what with the Race for the Cure hordes on the street. What's for lunch?How about the World Cheese Dip Championship from noon to 3 p.m. in the River Market Pavilion.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • States say 'nyet' to Russian election monitors

    The Tulsa World has reported that election officials have rejected requests from the Russian consulate in Houston to have Russians observe U.S. voting Nov. 8 in Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • Arkansas among states losing ground on school spending

    Interesting statistics in a Washington Post article on education spending.Many states, including Arkansas, are spending less on education since 2008, before the big recession.
    • Oct 21, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Marriage is so sacred in Arkansas people do it over and over again

    Arkansas leads the country in multiple marriages, including in the percentage who've been married three or more times. And they say it is the gay people who are ruining marriage.
    • Mar 13, 2015
  • Mary Steenburgen adds voice against gay discrimination law

    Mary Steenburgen, the Arkansas native actress, has added her voice to those opposing HB 1228, the bill aimed at preserving legal discrimination against gay people under the pretext of religious freedom. It would create untold other complications for all sorts of government activities to give people a religious excuse to avoid the law.
    • Mar 3, 2015
  • Speaking of the Clinton Foundation: Returns in maize and beans

    A reporter for Politifact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking organization, sent a reporter to Africa to see where money given to the Clinton Foundation has been put to work. He found tangible results.
    • Sep 6, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation