Friday, February 5, 2016

The Democratic debate and progressives' glaring foreign policy problem

Posted By on Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:38 AM

click to enlarge BEYOND IRAQ: Is there such a thing as a progressive vision for foreign policy in 21st century America? - WIKIPEDIA
  • BEYOND IRAQ: Is there such a thing as a progressive vision for foreign policy in 21st century America?

The fifth Democratic debate last night pitted Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders, mano y mano, on MSNBC's  friendly stage in New Hampshire.

The general consensus seems to be that the event lacked a real winner, much like the (basically) 50/50 split of the vote in the Iowa caucuses on Monday. Vox's Dylan Matthews writes that both candidates won, but identifies three "losers" last night: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who's seemingly lost control over the debate schedule; Wall Street, the target of Sanders' unerring critiques of inequality; and, foreign policy doves.

This last point may not be immediately obvious. Sanders, Matthews writes, keeps mentioning Clinton's 2002 vote authorizing the invasion of Iraq, "but more as a thumb in Clinton's eye than as a pivot to explaining why a Sanders presidency would be different and less bellicose. That's largely because it probably wouldn't be that much less bellicose. Sanders's plans for ISIS and Afghanistan are basically identical to Clinton's."

[Clinton is] still well to the right of the Democratic Party as a whole on these questions. But she also is actually well-versed in them, whereas Sanders's comments on foreign policy appear limited to a) praising the foreign policy achievements of the Obama administration, and b) hammering Clinton for her vote for the Iraq War.

The latter remains Clinton's biggest weakness. It's unclear why she can't simply say, "It was a huge mistake, I've rethought my views on the use of force and learned from my mistake," but in lieu of that kind of fully honest reckoning, her burn at Sanders — "A vote in 2002 is not a plan to defeat ISIS" — was rhetorically effective if not particularly reassuring to more dovish Democrats. It turned the conversation from being about her positions on the issue toward Sanders's near-total ignorance of it.

Sanders is right to dog Clinton on the war vote. Approving the war in Iraq isn't something that should ever be forgotten; given the magnitude of that disaster, and given the sense of bipartisan legitimacy that congressional Democrats lent the invasion, that vote should stick to Clinton's name for the rest of her life.

But there's another, larger point here. I don't know that it's fair to characterize Sanders' foreign policy as "near-total ignorance"; I do think he fails to articulate much of a position on most international matters. It's a deficiency made all the more glaring by the clarity of his calls for social and economic justice here at home.

However, I don't think the problem is with Sanders himself so much as it is with the fact that progressives in a post-Iraq War world simply are deeply uncomfortable with engaging in foreign policy questions. The problem is that there is no real sense of what a progressive foreign policy would look like these days.

Is it strictly anti-war? That's fine, but if so, what does an essentially pacifist approach to geopolitics look like? (And as Matthews says, Sanders isn't advocating for such.) Does that mean we ignore any humanitarian atrocity abroad and stick to strict isolationism? The pat answer is something about coalition-building — but that's just more avoidance of the substantive issues. To build an international coalition capable of action requires a coherent foreign policy philosophy to begin with. And American progressives lack that, in a major way; this is the best we can do.

To be clear, I'm not saying Clinton is any better than Sanders on this issue. Would I rather have a president fundamentally disengaged with foreign policy issues, or one who readily voted to rush into the wholesale catastrophe that was Iraq? I'm not sure. It's not a great choice. But until progressives learn what they want their 21st century foreign policy to look like, it's what we'll get.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Benjamin Hardy

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • UPDATE: Retired Arkansas Arts Center director Townsend Wolfe dies at 81

    Townsend Durant Wolfe, III, retired director and chief curator of the Arkansas Arts Center, has died at 81.
  • Subpoenas identify names of federal interest in kickback probe

    The Northwest Arkansas Economic Development District today provided me with the subpoena it received from federal investigators in a probe that led to former Republican Rep. Micah Neal's guilty plea to taking kickbacks from money he guided to a nonprofit agency and a private college in Springdale, apparently Ecclesia College.
  • Human Services says it's eliminated Medicaid application backlog

    The state Human Services Department has informed Gov. Asa Hutchinson that it has all but eliminated a backlog in applications for Medicaid coverage.
  • Praising Asa

    Let us now praise the governor for a starkly moderate record, at least in comparison with other red-state executives.
  • Glass houses

    Having gotten a deep security briefing and probably a confidential glimpse of our own vast cyberspying operation, Donald Trump is no longer pretty sure that the Kremlin didn't hack Democratic computers or employ other tactics to help his election.

Visit Arkansas

Indian Rock House at Fairfield Bay

Indian Rock House at Fairfield Bay

Winter is the perfect time to explore the natural stone shelters where native Arkansans once lived

Most Viewed

  • Google says: It's Lee's Birthday in Arkansas

    Several people have been shocked in checking to see whether a business or government office was open today and found, along with normal hours, a statement that hours might vary because it is Robert E. Lee's birthday in Arkansas and hours might differ. No mention of Martin Luther King Jr.
  • Save my health care. Just don't call it Obamacare

    A reporter for the Toronto Star visited Arkansas to illustrate the irony, to use a kind word, that abounds in the rush by Republicans to repeal Obamacare.
  • Free beer tomorrow: Trump's health plan

    Donald Trump has proclaimed that he has a health care plan coming that will cover everyone — yes, UNIVERSAL COVERAGE — and have lower deductible payments. More coverage for less, he suggests, with plenty of pain for Big Pharma in tough negotiating.
  • Goodson draws home staters for appeal in class action case

    John Goodson, the Texarkana lawyer, has a Feb. 7 date with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to argue that he shouldn't have been disciplined by federal District Judge P.K. Holmes for switching a class action case against an insurance company out of federal court into a state court that speedily approved a settlement.
  • Pork barrel included more than $40,000 for ozone therapy shipped from NWA to Benton

    Blogger Russ Racop uncovers another curious bit of spending of the pork barrel money known as the General Improvement Fund: Shipment of more than $40,000 from Northwest Arkansas legislators' allotment to a little-known outfit in Saline County that promotes an alternative medicine known as ozone therapy. Familiar legislative names were involved.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation