Thursday, February 18, 2016

Conner Eldridge and John Boozman spar over whether Senate should consider a nominee for Supreme Court vacancy

Posted By on Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:05 AM

click to enlarge ELDRIDGE: "Leaders in both parties should work together, put country over party, and do their job."
  • ELDRIDGE: "Leaders in both parties should work together, put country over party, and do their job."
Former U.S. Attorney Conner Eldridge, who is challenging U.S. Sen. John Boozman, said in a statement yesterday that the vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia should be filled. 

Many Republican senators have announced a plan of all-out obstructionism to block any nominee, regardless of qualifications, to the Supreme Court from President Barack Obama, potentially leaving the seat vacant for a year. We've noted a few times that this could end up being a political disaster in blue/purple states with tight senate races.

Of course, it's hard to believe this will be an issue in dead-red Arkansas. Boozman, as well as Sen. Tom Cotton, have pledged to block any nominee from Obama. Eldridge calls that "another example of what's wrong with Washington." But no one ever lost an election in Arkansas for being too anti-Obama. 

Eldridge said in a statement that "the President and the Senate should fulfill their constitutional obligations and work promptly to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court with a judge who puts the Constitution over politics and is both fair and impartial."

“Not filling a vacancy on the Supreme Court because of partisan politics is just another example of what’s wrong with Washington," Eldridge continued in his statement. "Leaders in both parties should work together, put country over party, and do their job. End of story.”

Boozman's own statement repeats the risible ruse that this is somehow about precedent, as opposed to senators using their constitutional prerogative as a power grab: 

After carefully considering the constituent feedback I have received it is clear that Arkansans overwhelmingly want a say in choosing Justice Scalia’s replacement through the presidential election. Arkansans want the Senate to wait until the next President is sworn in and I intend to adhere to their wishes. The fact of the matter is that it has been eighty years since a candidate nominated in an election year has been confirmed. Now is not the proper time to break this precedent.


And here is Cotton's statement: 

The choice of Justice Scalia’s successor should not belong to a lame-duck president, whose mandate is stale, and whose disregard for the constitutional constraints on his office are well known. The choice should belong to the American people. Voters deserve the chance to factor in the future of the Court as they cast their ballots in November. They deserve a say on a lifetime appointment that may change the balance of the Court and dramatically alter the direction of the nation.

Of course the American people elected Barack Obama by significant margins, twice, and Obama is still the president of the United States. The deal is just that Cotton really hates Obama and doesn't want him to nominate someone to the Supreme Court. So here we are. 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Most Viewed

  • Lee's lawyer writes about executed man's last hours

    Lee Short, the lawyer for Ledell Lee, the man Arkansas put to death just before midnight last night, posted on Facebook the following letter of thanks for personal support and a bit about Lee's last hours, distributing his possessions and talking to family.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation