Monday, March 28, 2016

Drug-testing welfare recipients: Costs outweigh benefits. Also: questions about treatment

Posted By on Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:57 AM

click to enlarge WHAT'S THE POINT: Gov. Asa Hutchinson says drug-testing welfare recipients is a blow at drug dependency, not merely a punitive measure. Others say the benefits don't begin to approach the costs.
  • WHAT'S THE POINT: Gov. Asa Hutchinson says drug-testing welfare recipients is a blow at drug dependency, not merely a punitive measure. Others say the benefits don't begin to approach the costs.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson
defended statewide testing of certain welfare recipients last week as a blow at drug dependence, not merely a punish-the-poor policy to mollify opponents of welfare assistance.

John Lyon of the Arkansas News Bureau looks at some depth at the subject here. The story recapitulates key points:

* The state will spend an inordinate amount to "catch" a tiny number of drug users among families that receive temporary cash assistance to keep kids' bodies and souls together during periods of unemployment.

* The nationwide experience is that drug testing plans turn up relatively few drug users among the poor. They can't afford it, for one thing.

The story doesn't note, as I did yesterday, that drug testing laws grew out of a right-wing think tank full of ideas about constricting the size of government.

My simple point: If Gov. Asa Hutchinson's real concern is drug dependency — and abuse of prescription drugs is epidemic these days — why start with a focus on a slice of the population demonstrably less likely to be abusers based on national experience? Why not undertake a broad-based program to provide drug treatment programs for all?

You may judge whether this idea is part of a broad assault on the welfare class by the added payments Hutchinson wants to put on people receiving Obamacare's Medicaid expansion; by his omission of the working poor from his income ax cuts; by his refusal in the campaign to support a minimum wage increase, and other policies hurtful to poor people.

Arkansas has endeavored to protect its drug-testing program from a legal challenge by first "screening" recipients for drug tests. To do this, they will ask welfare recipients if they've used drugs. 5th Amendment, anyone? But, also, those who admit drug use and then get tested won't be denied welfare benefits if they agree to treatment and continued testing. (What treatment is envisioned for the occasional smoker of a joint isn't yet known — Just Say No, perhaps?)

A lingering question remains about who will pay for that treatment program. Lyon's article says the state will not pay. A sponsor of the legislation has said the same. Defenders of the program say most recipients of this welfare money are Medicaid eligible and should qualify for drug treatment programs under Medicaid. But state officials are not ready to guarantee that in every case. This is the answer I got from Daryl Bassett, head of the Workforce Services Department on that particular question last week:

Is it guaranteed that a drug treatment program will provided for TANF recipients under Medicaid or some other means? Some seem to suggest that if you qualify for TANF you are automatically covered by Medicaid and automatically have access to paid coverage. Can you help me on this?

Most of the individuals on the TEA / Work Pays program are also potentially eligible for Medicaid services. Depending on the nature of the substance abuse treatment, individuals could qualify to pay for treatments through the Medicaid programs. This will ultimately be handled on a case by case basis.
So, maybe, maybe not.  

This remains the broader concern:
“We were disappointed to hear about the plan to expand that program because programs like this have such a bad track record in other states,” said Ellie Wheeler, senior policy analyst for Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families.

Tags: , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (21)

Showing 1-21 of 21

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-21 of 21

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

Visit Arkansas

Indian Rock House at Fairfield Bay

Indian Rock House at Fairfield Bay

Winter is the perfect time to explore the natural stone shelters where native Arkansans once lived

Most Viewed

  • Poore announces school closure plans in Little Rock

    With a healthy number of unhappy school district residents on hand, Little Rock School Superintendent Michael Poore announced today his plans for closure of school facilities said to be required to balance the budget as state desegregation aid ends and enrollment drops with movement of students to charter and other schools.
  • Poore, on short notice during work day, to talk about Little Rock school closings

    Little Rock School Superintendent Michael Poore has announced he will "share plans" this afternoon  to discuss facilities and budget — meaning which schools he'll recommend for closing and where the budget will be cut. Advocates for voter control of the school district aren't happy.
  • Internet sales may not be the whole story on local tax collections

    Little Rock thinks its lagging sales tax revenues are the fault of loss of commerce to Internet sales, which are generally untaxed. That's no doubt a factor. But it may not be the only one.
  • Obama commutes Chelsea Manning's sentence

    President Obama included the shortening of the 35-year sentence given Chelsea Manning for delivering classified U.S. information to WikiLeaks, including video of a U.S. helicopter attack on Iraqi civilians.
  • Bill for healthy food stamp purchases approved in committee

    Republican Rep. Mary Bentley got House Public Health Committee approval today for her HB 1035 to prevent use of food stamps for purchase of unhealthy food, a measure likely to prevent use of the supplemental nutrition benefit for soft drinks, candy and the like.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation