Wednesday, April 13, 2016

What happens to education spending if GOP hardliners kill Medicaid expansion

Posted By on Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:30 PM

click to enlarge THE ARKANSAS SENATE: Ten votes standing in the way of health care for 267,000 people. - BRIAN CHILSON
  • BRIAN CHILSON
  • THE ARKANSAS SENATE: Ten votes standing in the way of health care for 267,000 people.

With the legislative fiscal session underway, Arkansas's state budget is once again being held hostage by a small minority of hardline Republican senators who insist on reversing the expansion of Medicaid (a.k.a., the private option; a.k.a., "Arkansas Works") that now provides insurance to some 267,000 low-income Arkansans.

Gov. Hutchinson and other private option supporters of both parties have been arguing for weeks that killing the Medicaid expansion will do more than just hurt the people now receiving health coverage. By removing at least $142.7 million from the state budget (and likely much more), it will also send shock waves throughout the rest of the public sector, prompting cuts of 3 to 5 percent across all state agencies. And because schools comprise such a large portion of state outlayseducation stands to take a major hit.

In the life-without-Medicaid-expansion budget draft laid out by House Speaker Jeremy Gillam on Monday, around $30 million would be yanked from K-12 public schools. Gillam, a Republican, supports the private option. (Here are the overall hypothetical budget changes he presented; here's a document detailing cuts to the Public School Fund.) About two-thirds of that $30 million would come from cuts to three programs: 
  • $5 million from the Arkansas Better Chance program, which provides preschool tuition subsidies for families.
  • $9 million from National Board Certified Teacher stipends, a program that rewards highly trained educators.
  • $7 million from the Arkansas Public School Recognition Program, which rewards high performing schools.
In addition to the blow to K-12, higher education institutions would lose an additional $19.4 million, on net (see below for an explanation). Another $2.1 million would disappear from various ancillary educational functions of the state, including the Education Department, AETN, the School for the Blind and School for the Deaf and more.

Understanding what exactly those cuts entail requires some background on how Arkansas funds its schools, and what can and cannot be slashed. Hang around the education committee at the Capitol and you'll hear frequent invocation of the word "adequacy" as a sort of Biblical commandment of the state budget. Adequacy refers to a baseline amount of funding the state provides for K-12 public schools, a (very large) sum considered sacrosanct for fiscal purposes: Arkansas must pay the cost of an "adequate and equitable" education for its children before it pays for anything else, from roads to health care to prisons. When facing a major budget shortfall like the one the anti-Medicaid minority wants to foist upon the state, legislators can make cuts where they see fit — but not to anything included under the adequacy umbrella. For more background, see the 15-year-long Lake View school funding case decided by the Arkansas Supreme Court in the early 2000s.

So what is and isn't a part of adequacy? That can be a little vague, surprisingly, but some items are clearly off limits — most prominently, foundation funding, which is the per-pupil amount which pays the vast bulk of teacher and staff and administrator salaries in the state. At $2.05 billion, foundation funding dwarfs everything else in the public school fund, and indeed just about everything else in the state budget, which is around $5.33 billion. The foundation funding line item is on the second page of Gillam's document detailing education cuts. You'll see that foundation funding is not to be cut, because it can't be (thanks to Lake View). Foundation funding isn't the only item included under adequacy, but it's the big one.

Meanwhile, pre-kindergarten programs aren't considered part of adequacy. This is why ABC funding has been allowed to stagnate for years and years with no cost-of-living adjustment; foundation funding gets adjusted each year for inflation, as per adequacy requirements. It's also why pre-K will likely be among the items on the chopping block if the hardline Tea Party minority in the Senate gets its way and kills the private option. Same with National Board Certification and the school recognition program.

It should be noted that these cuts are all hypotheticals: Speaker Gillam is showing what it might look like if the state budget is reduced by $142.7 million, as the Tea Partiers want to do. Were these specific hypotheticals chosen for political reasons? Of course they were. The Public School Recognition Program, with its connotations of merit pay, reflexively appeals to "education reform" cheerleaders like those at the Democrat-Gazette editorial page just this week. More pointedly, a champion of that program happens to be one of the ten intransigent senators vowing to end Medicaid expansion, Sen. Missy Irvin (R-Mountain View). National Board Certified Teacher stipends were recently preserved after an outcry from teachers over a proposed regulatory change that would have limited payments distributed under the program. Cuts to pre-K, like cuts to foster care, sound awful to just about everyone.

In other words, the governor and his allies are trying to appeal to specific interest groups in sounding the alarm on cuts. Nothing wrong with that. Of course, as Max pointed out earlier this week, Hutchinson and his fellow establishment Republicans usually seem to believe any and all shrinkage of state spending is a good thing, and can always be compensated for by rooting out bottomless reserves of "waste, fraud and abuse" lurking in state government.

So, while Gillam and Hutchinson are undoubtedly on the right side of the private option fight, take their protestations of concern over strapped state budgets with a grain of salt. Note the irony here in the governor criticizing private option foe Sen. Bryan King for waving away concerns over budget cuts with the tried and true "waste, fraud and abuse" party line when Hutchinson himself said in January he'd pay for a big chunk of his supposedly "revenue neutral" highway funding plan with unspecified "increased efficiency measures." That's the same magic wand they're waving.

One final point on higher education. Gillam's life-without-Medicaid-expansion budget indicates a decrease of around $4.8 million to institutions of higher education. But the more accurate number is much higher — around $19.4 million. That's the sum of hypothetical cuts to every institution of higher ed in the state except one, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, which gets a $14.6 million increase from the state. At first, this appears to partly offset the cuts to two- and four-year schools. But the increase is illusory; UAMS isn't actually getting a windfall.  The institution stands to suffer a crushing blow if the private option goes away, and the $14.6 million is just intended to stem the bleeding a bit. 

The hospital at UAMS, like so many hospitals around the state, relies tremendously on the private option. Before Medicaid was expanded, the state spent tens of millions in public funds on uncompensated care to institutions like UAMS, prisons and community health clinics. The private option gave insurance to many of those patients, meaning the state was able to drastically reduce what it sent to such institutions. If 250,000+ Arkansans lose insurance, UAMS' incidence of uncompensated care shoots back through the roof to pre-2014 levels, cutting deeply into its bottom line. In other words, one way in which the private option helps the state budget is by reducing uncompensated care expenditures — and if Medicaid expansion is killed, the state will have to help UAMS make up the difference. Or maybe the Tea Partiers would rather see it shut down, too.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Benjamin Hardy

Readers also liked…

  • State Police issues statement on Jason Rapert 'threats'

    The State Police have issued a minor clarification in what appears to be an effort to soothe an enraged Sen. Jason Rapert, exposed here as overly excited about both a Conway parking lot question from a constituent as well as some inflammatory Internet rhetoric that he's interpreted as a dire threat on his life. State cops took his reports seriously, they say. But in the end, they found nothing actionable.
    • Sep 15, 2015
  • Transgender electrician may sue employer over her firing

    Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright has ruled that Patricia Dawson, a transgender woman, may pursue her lawsuit that she was wrongfully fired by her employer, H & H Electric, because of her sex.
    • Sep 16, 2015
  • 2nd guilty plea in bribery case over state mental health services

    Arkansas Business reports here on a federal court filing Wednesday that shows a second person has pleaded guilty to a bribery scheme to help a major contractor of the state Department of Human Services.
    • Sep 17, 2015

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Most Viewed

  • Lee's lawyer writes about executed man's last hours

    Lee Short, the lawyer for Ledell Lee, the man Arkansas put to death just before midnight last night, posted on Facebook the following letter of thanks for personal support and a bit about Lee's last hours, distributing his possessions and talking to family.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation