Thursday, April 28, 2016

Critic asks Highway Department to tell truth: No park in 10-lane freeway plan

Posted By on Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:14 AM

WHAT THE? Paul Dodds raises a question with Danny Straessle of the HIghway Department about why a Studio Main park plan was prominently displayed at a hearing on a 10-lane freeway project that includes no such park.
  • WHAT THE? Paul Dodds raises a question with Danny Straessle of the HIghway Department about why a Studio Main park plan was prominently displayed at a hearing on a 10-lane freeway project that includes no such park.

Leslie Peacock reported objections from Paul Dodds at the Highway Department public hearing on its desire to widen Interstate 30 to 10 lanes downtown.

Dodds objected to the concurrent presentation of a lovely plan by Studio Main for downtown parkland along the concrete gash through downtown for the simple reason that it is NOT a part of the Highway Department plan and won't be. Nor is there any realistic pathway to getting the money out of the city to do such a thing.

Dodds has followed up with a letter about the presentation and a request that the Highway Department make clear that there is no connecttion betwen their fact-finding and the lovely park. Fair point. His letter follows:

I was one of hundreds of people attending the large AHTD public hearing on April 26 on the I-30 Crossing. Over half of the time of the public hearing was devoted to the Studio Main presentation about how the I-30 crossing could be dressed up. It looked pretty good. It was not as good as a boulevard or the Chester St. bridge option, but was thoughtful and urban friendly. I was impressed by the presentation, the earnestness of Chris East and the amount of work that had been put into it all. Tuesday’s hearing was attended by over 50 AHDT reps and advisors. It was a major part of the department’s charm offensive to win backing for its plans.

When the hearing ended, I was totally confused about what the relation was between Studio Main and the AHDT plans. I suspect I was far from alone in the room, or in the TV watching audience, with a similar confusion.

I lived in Boston when the Big Dig was being sold to the public there. I went to public hearings where the highway department trotted out all sorts of nice pictures of how removing the overhead expressway would bind downtown back to its lost harbor front, with a delightful ribbon of urban park. The park planning was an integral part of getting public approval and support for the Big Dig, and the parks were funded as part of the overall project - as they should be. Silly, uninformed me. I thought that was happening here.

I am sure Chris East was not in the least trying to deceive the public, but I had no idea that implementing the Studio Main vision was not part of the AHTD plan till he mentioned almost in passing at the end of his long talk that funding was not in place, and city and private money would be needed. I thought - what??? Are we supposed to fund this with bake sales?

AHTD should issue a public correction to make clear that they have no intention of providing all the nice stuff Studio Main wants. Again, I say this not in any way to disparage the work that Studio Main has done or to question their motivations. I admire them for having tried so hard to work within this horribly flawed system. Still, I left with the distinct impression that AHTD used Studio Main to confuse the public into thinking that we are getting a much better plan than we are. If this was not an intentional bait and switch by the AHTD, it sure was a brilliant unintentional one.

If a public highway department gives so much precious stage time in a huge public hearing to an attractive plan they don’t back, they really need to make the lines known. I have learned since the hearing that the Amendment 91 money paying for most of I-30 Crossing could allow the AHTD to include much of the Studio Main vision into its budget under a broad “improvements” spending authority. Sadly, the several department reps I spoke with after the hearing all repeated that the Studio Main improvements were too expensive. Green, other than a little astroturf, is not their thing.

If I-30 must be widened (a big “ if”), then wouldn’t it be a relief if the majority of our Little Rock Directors pushed the AHTD to pay for things like parks, trees, sculptures and capital projects for public transit to soften the harshness and environmental evil of their plans? Alas, they prefer to sit by passively, feigning powerlessness. They watch pretty pictures of what will never be and collude with the AHTD in pretending that bake sales will bring us a sustainable, walkable and lively future city, while they yet again let highways rip out our city’s heart.

When will Little Rock remove its blinders, and back visions like Studio Main’s with real political will, not just attaboys? Why won’t our City leaders ask the AHDT to commit to mitigate the damage they are planning to our shared downtown space, while they build another needless white flight highway? Little Rock could be so much better if it defended itself effectively. It’s a shame.

Paul Dodds
Managing Director
Urban Frontier, LLC

Tags: , , , , , ,


Speaking of...

  • Thanksgiving week brings more Broadway Bridge developments

    November 20, 2016
    More being developments are planned Thanksgiving week in the project to replace the Broadway Bridge over the Arkansas River in downtown Little Rock. /more/
  • City proposes more work for consultant on I-30 project

    November 5, 2016
    The Little Rock City Board agenda meeting this week includes a city staff recommendation for a $50,000 contract with the consulting firm Nelson Nygaard to continue to consult on the proposed 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 through the middle of Little Rock. /more/
  • Another city rejects a concrete ditch

    November 2, 2016
    While Little Rock city fathers are intent on widening the Interstate 30 concrete ditch that slices through the heart of town, dividing and blighting neighborhoods, other cities are going in a different direction. /more/
  • Highway Department postpones Broadway Bridge demolition

    October 14, 2016
    The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department has announced postponement of the scheduled demolition today of the concrete arches on the old Broadway Bridge, which is being replaced by a new span over the Arkansas River in downtown Little Rock. /more/
  • Freeway fires: A lesson in Charlotte for Little Rock

    September 23, 2016
    Here's a deep essay from Think Progress on how freeways and suburbanization segregated Charlotte neighborhoods and helped create the social and racial divide that exploded in that city this week. Yes, of course, I'm thinking about a parallel with the push by the white business establishment in Little Rock for ever wider freeways. /more/
  • UPDATE: Metroplan signs off on waiver for Concrete Gulch

    August 31, 2016
    UPDATE: The Metroplan board has voted with scant opposition to waive the existing six-lane limit on area freeways so that the highway department may build a 10-lane concrete gulch through the heart of Little Rock. Leslie Newell Peacock will be back with more after a while. A grassroots group presented spirited opposition, all ignored. /more/
  • The Concrete Gulch Chronicles

    August 29, 2016
    In alternate universes, such as booming Vancouver, city leaders don't think ever wider freeways are the answer to traffic congestion. But what do they know, right Mayor Stodola? /more/
  • Concrete gulch hearing this week

    August 28, 2016
    Metroplan will vote Wednesday on a waiver of the six-lane freeway limit in its regional transportation plan to remove one obstacle to building a huge concrete gulch through the center of Little Rock — 10 lanes of freeway and even more concrete in some spots — to hasten the movement of traffic to and from suburbs to the detriment of quality of life in the city. Big surprise: the business establishment's drum major Mayor Mark Stodola, wants to pour the concrete. /more/
  • Resistance grows nationally to freeway expansions

    June 27, 2016
    The U.S. Public Interest Research Group has issued a news release about freeway expansion with relevance in Little Rock. It's about wasting money to widen freeways that only create more congestion. Sound familiar? /more/
  • Alarm sounded on Highway Commission attendance at Metroplan meeting on wider freeways

    June 24, 2016
    Members of the Highway Commission will be on hand at a Metroplan meeting where discussion is to begin on the state highway department's desire to lift the cap on freeway width in Central Arkansas. Will they be pushing for a hurryup rule change? A spokesman says no. A critic says you can't be too careful. /more/
  • More »

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • World leaders set to meet in Little Rock on resource access and sustainable development

    Little Rock will next week host a series of meetings on the use of technology to tackle global problems led by Club de Madrid — a coalition of more than 100 former democratic former presidents and prime ministers from around the world — and the P80 Group, a coalition of large public pension and sovereign wealth funds founded by Prince Charles to combat climate change.
  • Rapert compares Bill Clinton to Orval Faubus

    Sen. Jason Rapert (R-Conway)  was on "Capitol View" on KARK, Channel 4, this morning, and among other things that will likely inspire you to yell at your computer screen, he said he expects someone in the legislature to file a bill to do ... something about changing the name of the Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport.

Visit Arkansas

View Trumpeter Swans in Heber Springs

View Trumpeter Swans in Heber Springs

Magness Lake, in Heber Springs, is a magnet for swans

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation