Saturday, July 2, 2016

Mississippi case illustrates what's wrong with Arkansas anti-gay 'conscience' law

Posted By on Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:10 AM

click to enlarge WRITING MORE LAW: Roberta Kaplan, whose work to legalize same sex marriage is recounted in this book, is continuing her fight for equality with a groundbreaking victory for gay rights in Mississippi.
  • WRITING MORE LAW: Roberta Kaplan, whose work to legalize same sex marriage is recounted in this book, is continuing her fight for equality with a groundbreaking victory for gay rights in Mississippi.
Here's a good followup from Slate on the important ruling by Mississippi federal Judge Carlton Reeves that struck down that state's so-called religious conscience law. Mississippi, as the Arkansas law did earlier, passed a law nominally said to protect religious beliefs.

The laws were meant — as legislative debate and contemporaneous events illustrated — to provide a ground for people to discriminate against LGBT people in hiring, housing and public services. Everyone knew that.

But in Mississippi, the plaintiffs turned the religious freedom argument against the bigots.

The genius of the lawsuit against HB 1523, which was brought by Windsor mastermind Roberta Kaplan, is its fusion of fundamental yet typically distinct constitutional principles: “the guarantee of religious neutrality and the promise of equal protection of the laws.”

Mississippi argued that its law promoted religious liberty. Quite the opposite, Reeves explains: In reality, HB 1523 “establishes an official preference for certain religious beliefs over others,” a quintessential violation of the Establishment Clause. Anti-LGBTQ religious beliefs are explicitly favored; adherents to those beliefs receive a special right to discriminate that is unavailable to all others. “Persons who hold contrary religious beliefs are unprotected,” Reeves explains; “the State has put its thumb on the scale to favor some religious beliefs over others

.”This favoring of certain religious sects is especially problematic because it “comes at the expense of other citizens,” namely LGBTQ people. The Supreme Court has found that laws that advance religious beliefs in a way that burdens those who don’t share those beliefs violate the Establishment Clause. HB 1523 is guilty of this sin, because it gives anti-LGBTQ Mississippians “an absolute right to refuse service to LGBT citizens without regard for the impact on their employer, coworkers, or those being denied service.

”By uniquely burdening the LGBTQ community, Reeves notes, HB 1523 also violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Romer v. Evans, laws motivated by “animus” toward sexual minorities are unconstitutional. And as Reeves demonstrates in his decision, it is beyond rational belief that HB 1523 was motivated by anything but “a bare desire to harm” LGBTQ people. 
You may replace HB 1523 in every reference with the law Arkansas's legislature and governor approved and you have a directly analogous situation with the Arkansas effort to preserve legal discrimination against LGBT people. Hurry the lawsuits.

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (10)

Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Sunday's open line

    Here's the Sunday open line.
    • Oct 23, 2016
  • Community group seeks changes in LR School District budget

    #StandUp4LR, the grassroots group organized to regain local control of the Little Rock School District, now run by the state has issued a statement today critical of Superintendent Michael Poore's budget process for next year, particularly insufficient community input.  It also recommends a moratorium on new charter school seats in Little Rock because of the damaging impact that has on the School District.
    • Oct 23, 2016
  • State Police make arrest after gun pulled

    State trooper fires at armed man, makes arrest.
    • Oct 23, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Democratic Party calls for Justin Harris resignation

    The Arkansas Democratic Party today issued a statement saying Republican Rep. Justin Harris should resign.
    • Mar 6, 2015
  • Foster family disputes key statements from Justin Harris

    Craig and Cheryl Hart were the foster parents of the two sisters who were adopted by Rep. Justin Harris and his wife Marsha and later "rehomed." The Harts say that the adoption was allowed to proceed over the objections of the foster parents and local DHS staff due to pressure exerted by Cecile Blucker, head of the Division of Children and Family Services, on behalf of Justin Harris.
    • Mar 7, 2015
  • Mary Steenburgen adds voice against gay discrimination law

    Mary Steenburgen, the Arkansas native actress, has added her voice to those opposing HB 1228, the bill aimed at preserving legal discrimination against gay people under the pretext of religious freedom. It would create untold other complications for all sorts of government activities to give people a religious excuse to avoid the law.
    • Mar 3, 2015

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Nasty women rise up against The Deplorable Donald

    • What question,sweet little krazo? The one I already answered the second time you asked? Maybe…

    • on October 23, 2016
  • Re: Sunday's open line

    • "People ask what Trump will do after he loses the election, but it's obvious: he…

    • on October 23, 2016
  • Re: Sunday's open line

    • Max. Is there a way to find out how much money was raised through the…

    • on October 23, 2016



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation