Saturday, August 13, 2016

Reagan adviser rips Donald Trump's tax cut plan

Posted By on Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:37 AM

click to enlarge REAGANITE EXPLAINS: Donald Trump is all wrong on tax cut plan.
  • REAGANITE EXPLAINS: Donald Trump is all wrong on tax cut plan.
Bruce Bartlett, an architect of Ronald Reagan's 1981 income tax cut, has written today in the New York Times that Donald Trump is all wrong for embracing Reaganomics in his recently announced plan that would amount to a bonanza for the wealthy.

This stands out among all the rest, with emphasis supplied for Gov. Asa Hutchinson and them at the Capitol:

Those economists who claim to be following Reagan’s policies by supporting Mr. Trump’s large tax-cut proposal are guilty of one-size-fits-all economics. There is far more evidence from the last 35 years showing that tax increases do more to stimulate growth than tax cuts.
Bartlett replays the familiar facts that any "boom" that followed Reagan's tax cut (and there wasn't much of one) had more to do with other factors than tax-cutting, mostly a typical bounce from a recession recovery. Also:

Much credit for growth in the Reagan years must go to the sharp increase in government purchases for his defense buildup.

What many Republicans also forget is that Reagan cared about deficits and supported 11 different tax increases from 1982 to 1988 that collectively took back half of the 1981 tax cut. Although many conservative economists predicted doom from the 1982 tax increase, which equaled 1 percent of G.D.P., the beginning of the boom coincided with its enactment.
Bartlett doesn't repudiate the 1981 tax cuts. He said tax rates were too high then and inflation was pushing people into higher brackets. That's not the case today, with inflation in check and tax rates generally much lower.

Ernest Dumas has written this many times for us. Arkansas Republicans typically sneer, preferring faith in comfort for the rich over the hard facts. Here, the facts come from a man, then aide to Jack Kemp, who drafted the Reagan tax cut legislation. But, hey. What could he possibly know?

A New York Times analysis of Clinton/Trump tax ideas tells the story: Trump has gone to super orthodoxy with breath-taking giveaways for the rich. This is to get their money for the election, of course. So much for unconventional thinking. The big prize for the super rich is his proposal to end the estate tax. In Arkansas, a Koch-employed political operator actually suggested on Twitter the other day that the super wealthy have ways around estate taxes, but not "family farmers" and working stiffs. It's blazingly dishonest rhetoric. Under current law, a couple enjoys a $10.9 million estate tax exemption off the top. Some working stiffs. After years of searching, no one has ever found a "family farm" sold on account of estate taxes and farmers enjoy extended easy payment plans when they DO owe estate taxes. Fact is, you have to be VERY wealthy to owe estate taxes. It falls due in Arkansas each year on a few hundred people and there is NO state estate tax. The Koch shill at Americans for Prosperity almost certainly will never face an estate tax unless he gets a whopping pay raise from his overlords.

Tags: , , , ,


Speaking of...

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Nasty women rise up against The Deplorable Donald

    It had to happen. Donald Trump's debate interjection that Hillary Clinton was a "nasty woman" has become a battle cry among women; a Twitter meme; a Facebook favorite, and, naturally, a marketing opportunity for T-shirt, button and bumper sticker makers.
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • Formal opposition emerges to Issue 3, the corporate welfare amendment

    It became apparent this morning that at least some money would be spent in opposition to Issue 3, a massive corporate welfare proposal to allow the state to pledge unlimited tax money to private projects and to allow local governments to also give money to private business and chamber of commerce lobbyists, a practice that has been ruled unconstitutional currently.
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • Boozman goes negative on Conner Eldridge

    Hmm. Nice ol' Republican Sen. John Boozman goes negative on upstart Democratic challenger Conner Eldridge? Feeling maybe a tiny bit of heat from Eldridge's attacks on Boozman as a nice guy, underachieving nonentity more interested in globe trotting than leading, not to mention a devoted supporter of Donald Trump?
    • Oct 22, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Rep. Nate Bell blasts adoption story before seeing it; 'rehoming' bill introduced

    Response to our story about rehoming and adoption has been overwhelmingly positive, with one exception. Rep. Nate Bell (R-Mena) has informed me that writing this story makes me the predator and Justin Harris the victim. I'm hellbound, apparently.
    • Mar 4, 2015
  • Mary Steenburgen adds voice against gay discrimination law

    Mary Steenburgen, the Arkansas native actress, has added her voice to those opposing HB 1228, the bill aimed at preserving legal discrimination against gay people under the pretext of religious freedom. It would create untold other complications for all sorts of government activities to give people a religious excuse to avoid the law.
    • Mar 3, 2015
  • Pay raises for politicians: Two justices complain they need even more

    The independent citizens commission that sets pay for politicians under Amendment 94 held its public hearing on its plans this morning and drew scant response — with a notable exception of Supreme Court Justices Karen Baker and Jo Hart asking for even more money than the commission already plans to give them.
    • Mar 2, 2015

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation